What is this straightforward speech that you have now engaged in?
You might enjoy, ‘Authority and American Usage’ from Consider the Lobster by David Foster Wallace- he’s quite the wordy writer.
You might enjoy, ‘Authority and American Usage’ from Consider the Lobster by David Foster Wallace- he’s quite the wordy writer.
I spend like 20 minutes editing my epub of it; because it had no line-break. Usually that's not an issue; but in this case I had to scratch my head for a while before seeing the pattern (quote to remark) used within the wall-of-text presented...
Anyway; he uses suggested propaganda as the "authority" for quotes; then follows up with interpretations thereof, through the lens of consenting "Americans".
What is lacking is the comprehension of the author about consenting to suggested (information) implying ignorance of perceivable (inspiration). He's taking inventory of ignorant reactions without touching the source of ignorance, hence an exercise essay for testing his ability to map out others.
I got seven of his books, so if I ever find a moment to read them; I check him out further.
What is this straightforward speech that you have now engaged in?
I adapt to whatever inspires...in this case the two face symbolism; accompanied with suggested judgements. The two-face is suggested to tempt emotional outbursts from others, while protecting the "one" under the "two" faced mask.
Next there's the ewige jude (forever jew) and the political merchant (selling whatever others want or not want to hear)..."The face is always different, the rhetoric the same...But we swallow it all, and we'll see nothing change"
So distraction from perceivable change (motion) by tempting with suggested emotion (to move from); which implies ones ignorance of growth (living) within loss (process of dying). What did Chucky grow? Amy to Gene. Looking at her; while resisting the temptation of the suggested cunt persona; gets one "blond; blue eyed, married and a mother".
That's a little expression of my line of thinking...
What is this straightforward speech that you have now engaged in? You might enjoy, ‘Authority and American Usage’ from Consider the Lobster by David Foster Wallace- he’s quite the wordy writer.
I spend like 20 minutes editing my epub of it; because it had no line-break. Usually that's not an issue; but in this case I had to scratch my head for a while before seeing the pattern (quote to remark) used within the wall-of-text presented...
Anyway; he uses suggested propaganda as the "authority" for quotes; then follows up with interpretations thereof, through the lens of consenting "Americans".
What is lacking is the comprehension of the author about consenting to suggested (information) implying ignorance of perceivable (inspiration). He's taking inventory of ignorant reactions without touching the source of ignorance, hence an exercise essay for testing his ability to map out others.
I got seven of his books, so if I ever find a moment to read them; I check him out further.
I adapt to whatever inspires...in this case the two face symbolism; accompanied with suggested judgements. The two-face is suggested to tempt emotional outbursts from others, while protecting the "one" under the "two" faced mask.
Next there's the ewige jude (forever jew) and the political merchant (selling whatever others want or not want to hear)..."The face is always different, the rhetoric the same...But we swallow it all, and we'll see nothing change"
So distraction from perceivable change (motion) by tempting with suggested emotion (to move from); which implies ones ignorance of growth (living) within loss (process of dying). What did Chucky grow? Amy to Gene. Looking at her; while resisting the temptation of the suggested cunt persona; gets one "blond; blue eyed, married and a mother".
That's a little expression of my line of thinking...