I remember this dirty jew chewing on a donut with Putin in some slum in NYC. This jew probably made a few shekels letting Russia into NYC to do some business. Then he lectured us on "russian collusion" a few years later, like this jew rat hadn't ever done business with Russians and Putin himself.
I wasn't aware of that, so I looked up an article, and I couldn't help but laugh at this:
Schumer said the Russian-drilled petroleum from Lukoil – which bought out Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc. in 2000 – would be a boon the United States because it could help free America from dependence on oil from the OPEC nations, many of which are hostile Middle Eastern states.
Glad that worked! And here's an interesting note:
The takeover of Getty was the first time a Russian oil company ever took over a company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Wanted to add this as a separate comment. Don't you love how the highest ranking dem in the Senate has obvious dual loyalty, and the highest ranking dem in the house has obvious dual loyalty, but dual loyalty is just an antisemitic trope? 😂
What is this straightforward speech that you have now engaged in?
You might enjoy, ‘Authority and American Usage’ from Consider the Lobster by David Foster Wallace- he’s quite the wordy writer.
You might enjoy, ‘Authority and American Usage’ from Consider the Lobster by David Foster Wallace- he’s quite the wordy writer.
I spend like 20 minutes editing my epub of it; because it had no line-break. Usually that's not an issue; but in this case I had to scratch my head for a while before seeing the pattern (quote to remark) used within the wall-of-text presented...
Anyway; he uses suggested propaganda as the "authority" for quotes; then follows up with interpretations thereof, through the lens of consenting "Americans".
What is lacking is the comprehension of the author about consenting to suggested (information) implying ignorance of perceivable (inspiration). He's taking inventory of ignorant reactions without touching the source of ignorance, hence an exercise essay for testing his ability to map out others.
I got seven of his books, so if I ever find a moment to read them; I check him out further.
What is this straightforward speech that you have now engaged in?
I adapt to whatever inspires...in this case the two face symbolism; accompanied with suggested judgements. The two-face is suggested to tempt emotional outbursts from others, while protecting the "one" under the "two" faced mask.
Next there's the ewige jude (forever jew) and the political merchant (selling whatever others want or not want to hear)..."The face is always different, the rhetoric the same...But we swallow it all, and we'll see nothing change"
So distraction from perceivable change (motion) by tempting with suggested emotion (to move from); which implies ones ignorance of growth (living) within loss (process of dying). What did Chucky grow? Amy to Gene. Looking at her; while resisting the temptation of the suggested cunt persona; gets one "blond; blue eyed, married and a mother".
That's a little expression of my line of thinking...
Oy vey, dual loyalty is just a trope goyim!!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh8rpFTVBuM
What a scumbag.
I remember this dirty jew chewing on a donut with Putin in some slum in NYC. This jew probably made a few shekels letting Russia into NYC to do some business. Then he lectured us on "russian collusion" a few years later, like this jew rat hadn't ever done business with Russians and Putin himself.
I wasn't aware of that, so I looked up an article, and I couldn't help but laugh at this:
Glad that worked! And here's an interesting note:
Wanted to add this as a separate comment. Don't you love how the highest ranking dem in the Senate has obvious dual loyalty, and the highest ranking dem in the house has obvious dual loyalty, but dual loyalty is just an antisemitic trope? 😂
Do you notice how all the comments saying the truth about those jews are all -1? Meaning there is a jew somewhere that tries to influence this place.
Operation: Find The Mole (no offense to moles).
Obnoxious
Loud
Won't shut up
Stinks
Needs to be deloused daily
International Socialism vs National Socialism. Fake war to attempt the long held desire of godless occultists of genociding Europe
https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/
"Proof USA took the wrong side in WWII" is quite reductionist. Japan, for example.
Do you believe the mainstream narrative about pearl harbor?
The Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor https://fee.org/articles/the-day-of-deceit-the-truth-about-fdr-and-pearl-harbor/
McCollum Memo - Pearl Harbor False Flag Evidence https://www.scribd.com/document/323690216/McCollum-Memo-Pearl-Harbor-False-Flag-Evidence
Was Pearl Harbor a false flag operation? (Part I) https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/11/10/was-pearl-harbor-a-false-flag-operation-part-i/
10 Things They’re Still Not Telling You About Pearl Harbor https://www.rd.com/list/conspiracy-theories-about-pearl-harbor/
Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not https://thenewamerican.com/pearl-harbor-hawaii-was-surprised-fdr-was-not/
Well of course it was a false flag. But still the US didn't involve themselves due to a Holocaust inside German borders.
Then how the fuck does Schumer's Jewishness prove the US chose the wrong side in ww2...
That's all I'm really saying.
I wish you people would speak in something other than riddles.
They involved themselves because the jewish bankers who controlled US politicians wanted them to be involved.
On the other hand...his daughter is blond; blue eyed, married and a mother.
What is this straightforward speech that you have now engaged in? You might enjoy, ‘Authority and American Usage’ from Consider the Lobster by David Foster Wallace- he’s quite the wordy writer.
I spend like 20 minutes editing my epub of it; because it had no line-break. Usually that's not an issue; but in this case I had to scratch my head for a while before seeing the pattern (quote to remark) used within the wall-of-text presented...
Anyway; he uses suggested propaganda as the "authority" for quotes; then follows up with interpretations thereof, through the lens of consenting "Americans".
What is lacking is the comprehension of the author about consenting to suggested (information) implying ignorance of perceivable (inspiration). He's taking inventory of ignorant reactions without touching the source of ignorance, hence an exercise essay for testing his ability to map out others.
I got seven of his books, so if I ever find a moment to read them; I check him out further.
I adapt to whatever inspires...in this case the two face symbolism; accompanied with suggested judgements. The two-face is suggested to tempt emotional outbursts from others, while protecting the "one" under the "two" faced mask.
Next there's the ewige jude (forever jew) and the political merchant (selling whatever others want or not want to hear)..."The face is always different, the rhetoric the same...But we swallow it all, and we'll see nothing change"
So distraction from perceivable change (motion) by tempting with suggested emotion (to move from); which implies ones ignorance of growth (living) within loss (process of dying). What did Chucky grow? Amy to Gene. Looking at her; while resisting the temptation of the suggested cunt persona; gets one "blond; blue eyed, married and a mother".
That's a little expression of my line of thinking...