Many who are a part of the flat earth psyop are. However, i am against the flat earth psyop and only advocate for research and discussion.
Wrong
Even someone with only “rudimentary knowledge of physical relationships” couldn’t actually believe that. Your adversarial/reflexively contrarian attitude is hindering you. This not a fight; it’s just a discussion.
But it doesn’t
Of course it does. Look at the equations used!
Thanks for asserting something no one questioned.
You did question that when you asserted that i had “lost” to imply that you had “won” the conversation :(
You haven’t posted one
That’s true, i’ve posted 2. Here, i’ll throw you a bone - one of the assumptions required is that the world is spherical. Can you read through our conversation and find the second assumption i explicitly listed already?
That’s just your excuse to ignore and avoid considering anything i’ve said (or that you say in “response”). It is the functional equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming like a child.
There are paid shills that are part of the flat earth psyop - but i know of none, like myself, who are actively/overtly against that psyop.
Your saussurean bullshit
Never heard of him. It seems we do agree that language (including mathematics) is arbitrary though. How anyone could seriously think otherwise baffles me.
Many who are a part of the flat earth psyop are. However, i am against the flat earth psyop and only advocate for research and discussion.
Even someone with only “rudimentary knowledge of physical relationships” couldn’t actually believe that. Your adversarial/reflexively contrarian attitude is hindering you. This not a fight; it’s just a discussion.
Of course it does. Look at the equations used!
You did question that when you asserted that i had “lost” to imply that you had “won” the conversation :(
That’s true, i’ve posted 2. Here, i’ll throw you a bone - one of the assumptions required is that the world is spherical. Can you read through our conversation and find the second assumption i explicitly listed already?
2+2=4. Discussion over. No discussion need happen anymore. You’re a bad actor.
You were already disproven.
Did. Thanks for admitting Earth isn’t flat.
True, because we arbitrarily define it to be true.
But can a discussion end before it even begins?
I assure you, i am not. You are merely assuming that because you won’t listen or engage in good faith yourself :(
In your imagination, but in reality you said that perspective was the only reason that things are no longer visible...
Then you saw that they unambiguously assume a spherical earth, and that if the earth is not spherical then the calculation is meaningless.
Yeah, you’re a paid shill. Commit suicide, communist whore. Your saussurean bullshit doesn’t apply here.
That’s just your excuse to ignore and avoid considering anything i’ve said (or that you say in “response”). It is the functional equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming like a child.
There are paid shills that are part of the flat earth psyop - but i know of none, like myself, who are actively/overtly against that psyop.
Never heard of him. It seems we do agree that language (including mathematics) is arbitrary though. How anyone could seriously think otherwise baffles me.