You have to wonder: if the NYT wrote that Jones now had to pay "infinity money", how many readers would finally recognize this all for fiction versus the ones that would say, "It's about time he pays before he destroys our democracy and our climate."
They are merely illuminating for the peasants the idea of "judgments of too excessive an amount cannot be expected to be paid."
You know, for when 200 million people sue the CDC for infinity billion dollars. You They need precedent for why they shouldn't have to liquidate the department and dissolve.
You have to wonder: if the NYT wrote that Jones now had to pay "infinity money", how many readers would finally recognize this all for fiction versus the ones that would say, "It's about time he pays before he destroys our democracy and our climate."
They are merely illuminating for the peasants the idea of "judgments of too excessive an amount cannot be expected to be paid."
You know, for when 200 million people sue the CDC for infinity billion dollars.
YouThey need precedent for why they shouldn't have to liquidate the department and dissolve.