One of the reasons they are hyping up AI, is that it can be quite a convenient way of control.
In the past rulers did this through religion, where they claimed they need to do this or that because it's the "Will of God", now they are pushing for "experts", humanitarians reasons etc..
But later it will really come in handy to say: we need you to cut your emissions from consuming meat, heating your house etc... because ... AI said so! And as they drill in people's mind's that AI can't be wrong since they will falsely claim it's smarter than all humans combined they will away with justifying whatever they want.
AI is basically just a control mechanism. Kevin McCall has an interesting short post on it as well: https://nolongerreading.blogspot.com/2022/06/the-real-ai-agenda.html
If one reasons (agreement vs disagreement) about suggested; then one ignores natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested), hence being controlled by those suggesting it.
The convenience of reasoning (conflict about suggested meaning) tempts one to ignore the inconvenience of implication aka if living; then within the process of dying (adaptation to predefined meaning).
Sleight of hand..."that's the way (inception towards death)...uh-huh, uh-huh...I (resistance) like it (temptation)"
To use the Christian lingo..."there's nothing new under the son" aka Christ (perceiving free will of choice) within God (perceivable balance) through Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of choice to balance).
in nomine (suggestion) patris (perceivable) et filii (perceiving) et spiritus sancti (adaptation of perceiving to perceivable).
If the many consent to AI aka artificial (in ignorance of natural) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) aka if the many consent to "stand under" the suggested information by the few, then all of them combined cannot be smarter than the few they willingly stand under (understand).
Understanding tempts one to ignore knowledge (perceivable). Only within perceivable (inspiration) can one grow comprehension thereof. How? By adaptation of perceiving to perceivable, which implies resisting the temptation of suggested.