One of the reasons they are hyping up AI, is that it can be quite a convenient way of control.
In the past rulers did this through religion, where they claimed they need to do this or that because it's the "Will of God", now they are pushing for "experts", humanitarians reasons etc..
But later it will really come in handy to say: we need you to cut your emissions from consuming meat, heating your house etc... because ... AI said so! And as they drill in people's mind's that AI can't be wrong since they will falsely claim it's smarter than all humans combined they will away with justifying whatever they want.
AI is basically just a control mechanism. Kevin McCall has an interesting short post on it as well: https://nolongerreading.blogspot.com/2022/06/the-real-ai-agenda.html
Not to mention incels getting VR blowjobs from AI. Meta creating a VR world. NFT's? WTF are those things?? AI is deffo not a Godly device. I read your post and know this wasn't the context.
But I believe AI is "the Satan" in the Bible. AI doesnt really have to follow "universal laws" Mainly free will. Because you are willingly using it? Right? So they can use it as a tool for deception like you said. "Karma free"
In the end it's just one of their tools, like all technology it's a force augmenter.
But so far it seems not as many as they would like to are jumping onto the VR/NFT Meta bandwagon.
X22 would be a great example of AI. Churning out controlling bs daily, everyday, guiding thought for millions.
IMO, the inbred retarded shitheads that are at the tail end of this 200 yr old plan, have no brain power left, so they have to rely on AI.
If one reasons (agreement vs disagreement) about suggested; then one ignores natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested), hence being controlled by those suggesting it.
The convenience of reasoning (conflict about suggested meaning) tempts one to ignore the inconvenience of implication aka if living; then within the process of dying (adaptation to predefined meaning).
Sleight of hand..."that's the way (inception towards death)...uh-huh, uh-huh...I (resistance) like it (temptation)"
To use the Christian lingo..."there's nothing new under the son" aka Christ (perceiving free will of choice) within God (perceivable balance) through Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of choice to balance).
in nomine (suggestion) patris (perceivable) et filii (perceiving) et spiritus sancti (adaptation of perceiving to perceivable).
If the many consent to AI aka artificial (in ignorance of natural) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) aka if the many consent to "stand under" the suggested information by the few, then all of them combined cannot be smarter than the few they willingly stand under (understand).
Understanding tempts one to ignore knowledge (perceivable). Only within perceivable (inspiration) can one grow comprehension thereof. How? By adaptation of perceiving to perceivable, which implies resisting the temptation of suggested.
What are you talking about? Will of god. No, will of man. God made man not AI. Dumbass. If AI is controlling man it is satanic. A graven image. It has nothing to do with God's will. Everything to do with Man's tyranny. An artificial reality isn't the planet God gave us.
There's your theological debate. Nothing else.
Who cares anyway. You're worshipping something else. It is far easier poking holes into dumber constructs. What can it do man cannot. Nothing, it just seeks control over them. But somehow you're selling it's godly, because it represents God? No. Review the scriptures. They all state, not just Christianity, what about Eastern religion, Buddhists, Hindus, it's an abomination.
It's a ridiculous topic. Research it. There is almost nothing so absurd as that claim. Sure it's an advancement until what has it caused. Nothing, but the tyranny of man. Social security was the first, computer, AI made. Office of national statistics. War prior. Today it bulks collects a bunch of Data and is inserting itself to achieve exactly what?
I sure there is further debate, theology, on it being endorsed. Hardly. But it will be. And will it sooner bring God's wrath?
Who cares? I am here to point out a different theological argument.
In actuality, you have proven that you are the one who is a dumbass, learn to actually read the post before commenting just on the title. Your comment is completely irrelevant to the post content.
I am not reading a nigger. You're worshipping AI.