"And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so." Genesis 1:7 KJV
Also note that Wernher Von Braun, father of Nasa and modern rocket science only put one thing on his tombstone. Psalm 19:1, "the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth his handiwork."
Also look into military operations 'Dominic' and 'fishbowl' where the US military nuked the firmament. Together those operations mean 'Fishbowl of the Lord'.
Yes; both have some truths and some lies, that makes them wrong. A math book where half of the content is incorrect is wrong. You don't say "well I am going to just focus on the geometry aspect as the algebra is clearly wrong"... You trash it. Atheist dogma is something a christ cuck says when his views are challenged. It CANNOT be the word of God if it has "some truths and some lies". Before you rectally bleed further; I am not against the religious or Christians; just like normal NASA employees, they mean well. The organization is the problem.
You don't have to go by the Bible, all our ancestors from various cultures and religions seem to know we were on a non moving flat earth, and many describe a firmament. It wasn't until the fake moonlanding that the entire world was deceived. Flat earth was still being taught in the early 1900s. Big bang, evolution, and relativity are meant to make humans feel insignificant atheist, and put faith in human institutions and creations.
It's really only in the last 70 years people have thought we were spinning at 1000+ mph, hurtling around the sun, and expanding through the void at unimaginable speeds.... this is all clearly bullshit but have a good ride on your cosmic merry go round.
Well I dont really know one way or the other, but just some thoughts here.
Your thinking of operation starfish and fishbowl. Dominic seemed to be different.
Most of these shots were conducted with free-fall bombs dropped from B-52 bomber aircraft. Twenty of these shots were to test new weapons designs; six to test weapons effects; and several shots to confirm the reliability of existing weapons. The Thor missile was also used to lift warheads into near-space to conduct high-altitude nuclear explosion tests; these shots were collectively called Operation Fishbowl.[2]
Sounds like one of the experimental weapon designs was the thor missile which is what they used for operation fishbowl.
Starfish Prime was a high-altitude nuclear test conducted by the United States, a joint effort of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the Defense Atomic Support Agency. It was launched from Johnston Atoll on July 9, 1962, and was the largest nuclear test conducted in outer space, and one of five conducted by the US in space.
A Thor rocket carrying a W49 thermonuclear warhead (designed at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory) and a Mk. 2 reentry vehicle was launched from Johnston Atoll in the Pacific Ocean, about 900 miles (1,450 km) west-southwest of Hawaii. The explosion took place at an altitude of 250 miles (400 km), above a point 19 miles (31 km) southwest of Johnston Atoll. It had a yield of 1.4 Mt (5.9 PJ). The explosion was about 10° above the horizon as seen from Hawaii, at 11 pm Hawaii time.[1]:
The Operation Fishbowl nuclear tests were originally planned to be completed during the first half of 1962 with three tests named Bluegill, Starfish and Urraca.[2]
I understand how you guys think, that were in gods fishbowl or something.
But to me, it was more like trying to get out of the fishbowl. You can claim they hit the firmanent.
I think they were trying to blast open the van allen radiation belts so they could fly through and start exploring. But instead of blowing a hole, the radiation was just absorbed by the magnetic fields. I cant prove anything, but I think the timing was funny.
The first evidence for the radiation belts was reported in 1958 by James Van Allen using data from a cosmic ray detector on the very first NASA mission: Explorer 1 spacecraft. Explorer 1 launched into Earth's orbit on a Jupiter C missile from Cape Canaveral, Florida, on January 31, 1958
4 years later they are blowing nuclear bombs up there with the sole purpose to see what it did to the magnetic fields. Crazy fuckers. Then the moon landing happened supposedly 7 years later.
Yeah turns out if we just fly through the weak part really really quick well be fine guys.
What I read was operation fishbowl was within operation Dominic. And to be honest I'm not even sure nuclear bombs exist. All I've seen is the footage and accounts of very large bombs going off very high up. To me they look like they are hitting an actual hard surface. From everything I've seen the dome seems to have a layer with liquid-like properties, and a layer that is solid. If you search for videos of 'rocket hits firmament' or 'missile hits dome' you will see it go through the liquid-like layer, and then skip off or explode on the solid layer.
Whats interesting to note, is no one can explain what is happening and what is producing the light. If I had to wager, there is some spooky quantum stuff happening. And that perhaps there is a reason water is so important to life as we know it.
It's hard to know what the truth is. But part of what we call "science" is the ability for people to replicate these experiments on their own to see if they can be replicated. The reason I am saying this is because....
No one has been able to create this effect enough to provide any real kind of light. I am sure someone has built a giant one but I bet even one the size of the house wouldnt light a room. Maybe if a different medium was used besides water, which is a idea that has been touched on before. You might get somewhere. Proably has some kind of implications in other fields.
But you can replicate the experiments if you want, but its rather simple how they are able to determine what the sun uses as a fuel source.
I cant help but have flashback of chemistry, physics and algebra because at one point I was pretty decent with all this stuff. A very long time ago.
You can say its all bullshit, but the math works. If it didnt, we wouldnt have things like electronics, or the nuclear bomb :(.
I mean you would have a better chance of convincing me that earth is some interdimensional manifestation. But a flat earth surrounded by mountains, just seems weird to me. I dont understand how time and space being real would disprove the existence of god anyway.
Yeah they lied about alot of things, not just about the reality of our existence either, so why do people get such a boner for this one thing?
A wrong (and/or contrived/mythological) explanation for stars is worse than none at all. All the cultures and mythologies for the stars they had that came before you are good examples. They all had "explanations" too...
"And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so." Genesis 1:7 KJV
Also note that Wernher Von Braun, father of Nasa and modern rocket science only put one thing on his tombstone. Psalm 19:1, "the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth his handiwork."
Also look into military operations 'Dominic' and 'fishbowl' where the US military nuked the firmament. Together those operations mean 'Fishbowl of the Lord'.
Bible vs. NASA is like Red vs. Blue. Both are wrong.
Yes; both have some truths and some lies, that makes them wrong. A math book where half of the content is incorrect is wrong. You don't say "well I am going to just focus on the geometry aspect as the algebra is clearly wrong"... You trash it. Atheist dogma is something a christ cuck says when his views are challenged. It CANNOT be the word of God if it has "some truths and some lies". Before you rectally bleed further; I am not against the religious or Christians; just like normal NASA employees, they mean well. The organization is the problem.
You don't have to go by the Bible, all our ancestors from various cultures and religions seem to know we were on a non moving flat earth, and many describe a firmament. It wasn't until the fake moonlanding that the entire world was deceived. Flat earth was still being taught in the early 1900s. Big bang, evolution, and relativity are meant to make humans feel insignificant atheist, and put faith in human institutions and creations.
This is to point you in the right direction, that is a large question.
https://communities.win/c/flatearthresearch/p/15K6lZryo2/
It's really only in the last 70 years people have thought we were spinning at 1000+ mph, hurtling around the sun, and expanding through the void at unimaginable speeds.... this is all clearly bullshit but have a good ride on your cosmic merry go round.
Well I dont really know one way or the other, but just some thoughts here.
Your thinking of operation starfish and fishbowl. Dominic seemed to be different.
Sounds like one of the experimental weapon designs was the thor missile which is what they used for operation fishbowl.
I understand how you guys think, that were in gods fishbowl or something.
But to me, it was more like trying to get out of the fishbowl. You can claim they hit the firmanent.
I think they were trying to blast open the van allen radiation belts so they could fly through and start exploring. But instead of blowing a hole, the radiation was just absorbed by the magnetic fields. I cant prove anything, but I think the timing was funny.
4 years later they are blowing nuclear bombs up there with the sole purpose to see what it did to the magnetic fields. Crazy fuckers. Then the moon landing happened supposedly 7 years later.
Yeah turns out if we just fly through the weak part really really quick well be fine guys.
Yeah ok ^^.
What I read was operation fishbowl was within operation Dominic. And to be honest I'm not even sure nuclear bombs exist. All I've seen is the footage and accounts of very large bombs going off very high up. To me they look like they are hitting an actual hard surface. From everything I've seen the dome seems to have a layer with liquid-like properties, and a layer that is solid. If you search for videos of 'rocket hits firmament' or 'missile hits dome' you will see it go through the liquid-like layer, and then skip off or explode on the solid layer.
Example: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fsfNDkf2ekFI/
This just does not look like space and the van Allen radiation belt to me.
So I went down this rabbit hole for a bit.
Whats interesting to note, is no one can explain what is happening and what is producing the light. If I had to wager, there is some spooky quantum stuff happening. And that perhaps there is a reason water is so important to life as we know it.
It's hard to know what the truth is. But part of what we call "science" is the ability for people to replicate these experiments on their own to see if they can be replicated. The reason I am saying this is because....
No one has been able to create this effect enough to provide any real kind of light. I am sure someone has built a giant one but I bet even one the size of the house wouldnt light a room. Maybe if a different medium was used besides water, which is a idea that has been touched on before. You might get somewhere. Proably has some kind of implications in other fields.
But you can replicate the experiments if you want, but its rather simple how they are able to determine what the sun uses as a fuel source.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQJj2kBJ5A8
On top of that, they have some convincing math on how the sun uses its composition to fuel its reaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux33-5k8cjg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8cX0YbRLFo
I cant help but have flashback of chemistry, physics and algebra because at one point I was pretty decent with all this stuff. A very long time ago.
You can say its all bullshit, but the math works. If it didnt, we wouldnt have things like electronics, or the nuclear bomb :(.
I mean you would have a better chance of convincing me that earth is some interdimensional manifestation. But a flat earth surrounded by mountains, just seems weird to me. I dont understand how time and space being real would disprove the existence of god anyway.
Yeah they lied about alot of things, not just about the reality of our existence either, so why do people get such a boner for this one thing?
Ya I've seen a fair amount of his stuff, haven't seen that one though, ill check it out.
Lol, imagine beleiving in Flat Earth because "I shouldn't be able to see that far" and then not being able to explain stars.
Keep believing all the shitty artwork nasa shows ya!
A wrong (and/or contrived/mythological) explanation for stars is worse than none at all. All the cultures and mythologies for the stars they had that came before you are good examples. They all had "explanations" too...