AI today should be an acronym for Algorithmic Intelligence and not Artificial. There is a big difference.
Quantum Computing should be thought of as make believe pseudo-science with no actual real world implementation. Read the fine print on all supposed quantum computers. It states it is using virtual q-bits as we are not yet able to harness the actual monitoring of particles in real time as described by the definition of quantum entanglement.
Algorithmic Intelligence and not Artificial. There is a big difference...
a) artificial (suggested information) implies the ignorance of natural (perceivable inspiration).
b) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo) - "to understand" represents standing under suggested information; while ignoring to grow comprehension within perceivable aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
c) the few suggest ALGORISM (numerical computation) to tempt each "one" of the many to ignore...
NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit"; from U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one"
COMPUTE, verb - "to cast together several sums or particulars, to ascertain the amount or aggregate"
Nature sets apart the whole (perceivable) into partials (perceiving); hence impressing apartheid. The partials (living) set apart represent the temporary resistance within the ongoing temptation of being aggregated back into whole (process of dying).
The parasitic few suggest aggregation (togetherness) to tempt the many to ignore the resistance needed to sustain apartheid (living) within whole (process of dying).
a) QUAN'TUM, noun - "the quantity; the amount"...one (partial) within oneness (whole) implies the quantity and amount of "one" unless "one" chooses to count other ones (singular) as suggested quantities (plural).
b) AMOUNT', verb [Latin mons, a mountain] - "to rise to or reach by an accumulation of particulars into an aggregate whole; to compose in the whole"
How much can the few rise mount zion until the aggregated "many" comprehend being partials (living) within whole (process of dying) as well?
Glad to see someone else state this.
AI today should be an acronym for Algorithmic Intelligence and not Artificial. There is a big difference.
Quantum Computing should be thought of as make believe pseudo-science with no actual real world implementation. Read the fine print on all supposed quantum computers. It states it is using virtual q-bits as we are not yet able to harness the actual monitoring of particles in real time as described by the definition of quantum entanglement.
aka "Statistics"
a) artificial (suggested information) implies the ignorance of natural (perceivable inspiration).
b) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo) - "to understand" represents standing under suggested information; while ignoring to grow comprehension within perceivable aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
c) the few suggest ALGORISM (numerical computation) to tempt each "one" of the many to ignore...
NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit"; from U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one"
COMPUTE, verb - "to cast together several sums or particulars, to ascertain the amount or aggregate"
Nature sets apart the whole (perceivable) into partials (perceiving); hence impressing apartheid. The partials (living) set apart represent the temporary resistance within the ongoing temptation of being aggregated back into whole (process of dying).
The parasitic few suggest aggregation (togetherness) to tempt the many to ignore the resistance needed to sustain apartheid (living) within whole (process of dying).
Algorithmic Inference.
No Intelligence. No Life. No Sentience. No Awareness.
All the silly "AI will become sentient and kill us" stories are just stupid stories for children who never took a single class in ML.
Even more stupid is "quantum-computer proof."
Anybody who studies crypto algos, knows that a "future quantum computer proof " encryption algo does not exist.
a) QUAN'TUM, noun - "the quantity; the amount"...one (partial) within oneness (whole) implies the quantity and amount of "one" unless "one" chooses to count other ones (singular) as suggested quantities (plural).
b) AMOUNT', verb [Latin mons, a mountain] - "to rise to or reach by an accumulation of particulars into an aggregate whole; to compose in the whole"
How much can the few rise mount zion until the aggregated "many" comprehend being partials (living) within whole (process of dying) as well?