Why? It’s irrelevant. They’ve been retreating since before the Industrial revolution began. They’re also growing in places. Mankind has fucking nothing to do with it.
But nothing is warming. Global climate runs on a series of cycles. The shortest is 11 years; the longest is 13,000. Barring large-scale black swan events (such as VI6 or higher volcanoes, asteroid impacts, and major changes in solar output), the climate follows these cycles predictably on all mid to long-term scales. ~13,000 years ago, North Africa was wet and verdant. Then the desert crept up to the coast as the last ice age ended. These things happen. Most of Earth’s history was hotter than today. Were the dinosaurs driving too many cars?
If the first settlers to Alaska froze to death, by the 1000s. Same as Siberia digging the railroads, Norway the same. What went wrong. Humans did. As they populated the weather warmed. The more they've populated the more the weather has warmed. Simply test this theory. In Anchorage the temperature averages higher than in other points of Alaska. So those humans cause, you got it, warming.
Now we add billions of humans since there weren't any in those places. Where you claim the beavers were sipping on pino coladas in the freaking Artic, shedding their fur for the sjws who don't wear it today? What are you claiming?
Once upon a time ago, no, dinosaurs didn't exist, definitely not 13k years ago. They're a fictional creation and an invention, selling monsters to stupid people with gullible imaginations.
But okay you're saying the weather changes. Yes it does. What speeds up weather change. Dinosaurs eating all the trees? No, what? A cycle where the planet is a stop watch and every 13k years it goes pop. That is freaking dumb.
Yes our Sun and cosmic alignment affect the weather. How much do we. All those cities warmer than where there aren't?
Yes I emphatically agree a cycle occurs and without the human it would also occur. Problematic on a changing globe subjective to the seasons, rotation, and alignment. But to state the weather isn't changing, and we aren't another factor affecting it, is ignorant. I don't believe in the solution. I find it ridiculous. I don't think the weather cares. It's absurd, buy climate change, and you too can cause climate change. Seriously they want to change the weather by changing the weather. Hahaha. What went wrong. They just get dumber. Until it's the Mayan sacrifices.
The more humans, the "they" there, it was explanatory, have populated, the more the weather has warmed. Not whatever you said. It isn't English, it isn't science. It's autism and severe dyslexia.
I might have added, the ice age occurs without humans. Volcanoes happen, if large enough, can severely affect the weather. The Sun can as well with periods of prolonged warming and cooling. Of course there is also cosmic impact, meteors and comets.
But humans are and continue too, the more population they add getting affected by the weather, and the more population causing changes to the weather.
The problem today is the solution is a hoax. It takes these words, and it runs them into a freaking computer. Guess what. It changes the script, by programming a heap of bullshit. Make human use more computer to stop weather. Isn't that real simple. Hahaha. Literally that dumb. So it takes a narrative where there's all this population, and it says don't worry guys, because guys it's climate change. Don't worry. If you buy the EV it will stop the Volcano and the Hurricane. It's okay you built in the way of a Volcano and a Hurricane, because the climate change is man made. Just try to use more computers, and they stop those emissions. Look, anybody disagreeing is muted and sacrificed to the climate change. Remember, the way to beat climate change, is by causing climate change. So please just try to immigrate into the Arctic. If you don't have the Internet in the Arctic you'll have the climate change. Then the Arctic can pay for it. The Arctic needs to pay for climate change by immigrating all the emerging populations. It gets worse. If it ain't automated by computers than it emits. If cows aren't cyborgs, they make cyborg cows today, they feed them from these battery cages, intravenously and inseminating them, putting VR goggles on them to trick the cow into thinking something, milking them all day. If the cows aren't cyborgs than they aren't natural because they emit so much more. Don't worry, computers stop climate change, by telling all the time that there's the weather. Computers are so natural they simply don't emit.
"But humans are and continue too, the more population they add getting affected by the weather, and the more population causing changes to the weather."
What you are noticing is the Urban Heat Island Effect. Faggots create these huge metropolis's, then blame the cancer it causes on everyone else. This is the wheelhouse where most climate loons pull their funny numbers from and hope no on notices.
"Look! It's hotter here now than it was back then!!!"
"Yeah, no shit. There's a city here now. That doesn't mean the whole Earth will incinerate in 20 years."
If the first settlers to Alaska froze to death, by the 1000s. Same as Siberia digging the railroads, Norway the same. What went wrong. Humans did. As they populated the weather warmed.
Nope. The weather warmed, thus they populated. You’re completely wrong.
The more they've populated the more the weather has warmed.
Other way around.
Simply test this theory.
Did. You have nothing to suggest you are correct, and the laws of physics prove you wrong.
In Anchorage the temperature averages higher than in other points of Alaska. So those humans cause, you got it, warming.
Nope. The temperatures are higher, therefore more people moved there.
Where you claim the beavers were sipping on pino coladas in the freaking Artic, shedding their fur for the sjws who don't wear it today? What are you claiming?
Maybe you could find out by reading the posts.
Once upon a time ago, no, dinosaurs didn't exist, definitely not 13k years ago.
No one said they did.
They're a fictional creation
Okay, you’re clinically insane and all of your comments on this subject are dismissed. AGW does not exist. You are repeating lies created by people who want to exterminate the white race. Get yourself in order or never post again.
What speeds up weather change.
Volcanoes, asteroids, the position of the planets within the Sun’s magnetic field…
A cycle where the planet is a stop watch
No one said this.
How much do we.
Not at all.
All those cities warmer than where there aren't?
The cities are in warm places because they’re warm.
Yes I emphatically agree a cycle occurs and without the human it would also occur.
Do not spam me with your bullshit. You have taken my words and shat all over them. You fucking nigger. The concept was so easy anybody else except a nigger could understand. Read that nigger name. It is autistic. Tallestskil. Nigger. It is no wonder you don't communicate properly, or conceptually. You're autistic.
I provided proof, glacier retreat. Why is that nigger. Population causes warmer weather, urbanisation has caused increased temperature. Meaning humans cause climate change.
Those glaciers are gone. Alaska, Alps, Himalayas, Urals, Rockies, Andies, etc etc. Retreated and evaporated. Beside them there's a bunch of population changing the natural habitat affecting the weather.
No nigger. Cities, urbanisation, major roads in the same area as surrounding countryside are warmer on greater averages than everywhere else there isn't. What about agricultural land and industry.
Do humans cause climate change. Look at the ground water being evaporated into causing ghost towns and droughts. Huge lakes, and rivers depleting, and glaciers retreating. Yes humans caused this.
Fuck off back to nigger school. Don't fucking respond to me like that again. You aren't better, you aren't correct. You're autistic. I don't need my words repeated back with your bullshit. Speak your own. Don't mince mine. I am not a nigger.
Land “readings” are diverging from satellite data (which NASA itself says is more accurate and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places without recording equipment. To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has been no warming there, despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using just the satellite record, the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, we see the difference. Never mind that there have only been ecological benefits to rising CO2.
It has been rising for 13,000 years. In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than any claim made public by any outlet. Here’s the source data for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that NOAA marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.
“Okay, not ice caps, but what about the glaciers?”
They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages. That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?
“But but but but but but but but muh consensus! They agree! Because I say they do! That makes what they say true!”
Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has a temperature record that has been around long enough for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.
The United States has a network of 1200+ USHCN stations with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.
So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES? That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. NO. WARMING.
And yet there has been zero warming SINCE THEN, too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.
Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? (La Jolla and La Jolla; Sydney and Sydney, respectively)? Funny how all the gauges show a 0.63mm/yr rise (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”
“But weather is becoming more extreme!”
Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not fires. Ha! Not floods.
USGS research has shown no linkage between flooding (either increases or decreases) and the increase in greenhouse gases. Essentially, from USGS long-term streamgage data for sites across the country with no regulation or other changes to the watershed that could influence the streamflow, the data shows no systematic increases in flooding through time.
Your narrative is predicated on laziness. Your narrative is predicated on people not doing their homework and not comprehending the data they see. Your narrative is predicated on appeals to authority and the expectation that your masters will never lie to you. That’s the only way it has ever existed.
Why? It’s irrelevant. They’ve been retreating since before the Industrial revolution began. They’re also growing in places. Mankind has fucking nothing to do with it.
Yep.
But nothing is warming. Global climate runs on a series of cycles. The shortest is 11 years; the longest is 13,000. Barring large-scale black swan events (such as VI6 or higher volcanoes, asteroid impacts, and major changes in solar output), the climate follows these cycles predictably on all mid to long-term scales. ~13,000 years ago, North Africa was wet and verdant. Then the desert crept up to the coast as the last ice age ended. These things happen. Most of Earth’s history was hotter than today. Were the dinosaurs driving too many cars?
Dude mankind has everything to do with it.
If the first settlers to Alaska froze to death, by the 1000s. Same as Siberia digging the railroads, Norway the same. What went wrong. Humans did. As they populated the weather warmed. The more they've populated the more the weather has warmed. Simply test this theory. In Anchorage the temperature averages higher than in other points of Alaska. So those humans cause, you got it, warming.
Now we add billions of humans since there weren't any in those places. Where you claim the beavers were sipping on pino coladas in the freaking Artic, shedding their fur for the sjws who don't wear it today? What are you claiming?
Once upon a time ago, no, dinosaurs didn't exist, definitely not 13k years ago. They're a fictional creation and an invention, selling monsters to stupid people with gullible imaginations.
But okay you're saying the weather changes. Yes it does. What speeds up weather change. Dinosaurs eating all the trees? No, what? A cycle where the planet is a stop watch and every 13k years it goes pop. That is freaking dumb.
Yes our Sun and cosmic alignment affect the weather. How much do we. All those cities warmer than where there aren't?
Yes I emphatically agree a cycle occurs and without the human it would also occur. Problematic on a changing globe subjective to the seasons, rotation, and alignment. But to state the weather isn't changing, and we aren't another factor affecting it, is ignorant. I don't believe in the solution. I find it ridiculous. I don't think the weather cares. It's absurd, buy climate change, and you too can cause climate change. Seriously they want to change the weather by changing the weather. Hahaha. What went wrong. They just get dumber. Until it's the Mayan sacrifices.
or
The more the weather has warmed, they've populated them more .
What? Are you dyslexic. No.
The more humans, the "they" there, it was explanatory, have populated, the more the weather has warmed. Not whatever you said. It isn't English, it isn't science. It's autism and severe dyslexia.
I might have added, the ice age occurs without humans. Volcanoes happen, if large enough, can severely affect the weather. The Sun can as well with periods of prolonged warming and cooling. Of course there is also cosmic impact, meteors and comets.
But humans are and continue too, the more population they add getting affected by the weather, and the more population causing changes to the weather.
The problem today is the solution is a hoax. It takes these words, and it runs them into a freaking computer. Guess what. It changes the script, by programming a heap of bullshit. Make human use more computer to stop weather. Isn't that real simple. Hahaha. Literally that dumb. So it takes a narrative where there's all this population, and it says don't worry guys, because guys it's climate change. Don't worry. If you buy the EV it will stop the Volcano and the Hurricane. It's okay you built in the way of a Volcano and a Hurricane, because the climate change is man made. Just try to use more computers, and they stop those emissions. Look, anybody disagreeing is muted and sacrificed to the climate change. Remember, the way to beat climate change, is by causing climate change. So please just try to immigrate into the Arctic. If you don't have the Internet in the Arctic you'll have the climate change. Then the Arctic can pay for it. The Arctic needs to pay for climate change by immigrating all the emerging populations. It gets worse. If it ain't automated by computers than it emits. If cows aren't cyborgs, they make cyborg cows today, they feed them from these battery cages, intravenously and inseminating them, putting VR goggles on them to trick the cow into thinking something, milking them all day. If the cows aren't cyborgs than they aren't natural because they emit so much more. Don't worry, computers stop climate change, by telling all the time that there's the weather. Computers are so natural they simply don't emit.
"But humans are and continue too, the more population they add getting affected by the weather, and the more population causing changes to the weather."
What you are noticing is the Urban Heat Island Effect. Faggots create these huge metropolis's, then blame the cancer it causes on everyone else. This is the wheelhouse where most climate loons pull their funny numbers from and hope no on notices.
"Look! It's hotter here now than it was back then!!!"
"Yeah, no shit. There's a city here now. That doesn't mean the whole Earth will incinerate in 20 years."
It has nothing to do with global climate change.
No. I am reversing your cause and effect.
Suggesting: It was cold, so nobody lived there, then it got warmer so people migrated.
Then why is there absolutely no evidence of this.
Nope. The weather warmed, thus they populated. You’re completely wrong.
Other way around.
Did. You have nothing to suggest you are correct, and the laws of physics prove you wrong.
Nope. The temperatures are higher, therefore more people moved there.
Maybe you could find out by reading the posts.
No one said they did.
Okay, you’re clinically insane and all of your comments on this subject are dismissed. AGW does not exist. You are repeating lies created by people who want to exterminate the white race. Get yourself in order or never post again.
Volcanoes, asteroids, the position of the planets within the Sun’s magnetic field…
No one said this.
Not at all.
The cities are in warm places because they’re warm.
Discussion over. You admit AGW doesnt exist.
No one said this.
We’re not. We physically cannot. Go to the links.
Do not spam me with your bullshit. You have taken my words and shat all over them. You fucking nigger. The concept was so easy anybody else except a nigger could understand. Read that nigger name. It is autistic. Tallestskil. Nigger. It is no wonder you don't communicate properly, or conceptually. You're autistic.
I provided proof, glacier retreat. Why is that nigger. Population causes warmer weather, urbanisation has caused increased temperature. Meaning humans cause climate change.
Those glaciers are gone. Alaska, Alps, Himalayas, Urals, Rockies, Andies, etc etc. Retreated and evaporated. Beside them there's a bunch of population changing the natural habitat affecting the weather.
No nigger. Cities, urbanisation, major roads in the same area as surrounding countryside are warmer on greater averages than everywhere else there isn't. What about agricultural land and industry.
Do humans cause climate change. Look at the ground water being evaporated into causing ghost towns and droughts. Huge lakes, and rivers depleting, and glaciers retreating. Yes humans caused this.
Fuck off back to nigger school. Don't fucking respond to me like that again. You aren't better, you aren't correct. You're autistic. I don't need my words repeated back with your bullshit. Speak your own. Don't mince mine. I am not a nigger.
Cool.
Land “readings” are diverging from satellite data (which NASA itself says is more accurate and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places without recording equipment. To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has been no warming there, despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using just the satellite record, the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, we see the difference. Never mind that there have only been ecological benefits to rising CO2.
They’re not melting. They go through cycles. 1974 had less ice than today. Oh, and don’t listen to what scientists say, whatever you do. Nowhere is melting out of turn, not even Greenland (where it has been growing for something like 30 years). Oh, and the ice cores themselves? They show that the past was hotter.
It has been rising for 13,000 years. In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than any claim made public by any outlet. Here’s the source data for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that NOAA marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.
Guess what? It’s also cyclical.
They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages. That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?
Sorry, there never was any consensus.
Because they do (and because papers often aren’t published because the publishing groups are owned by AGW liars).
The purposeful destruction of the economy and infrastructure of the Western world and only the Western world.
None of the data supports the existence of AGW.
Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has a temperature record that has been around long enough for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.
The United States has a network of 1200+ USHCN stations with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.
So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES? That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. NO. WARMING.
At the very best (for your delusions), you (meaning your own authorities) can say that there has been zero change since modern recordings began. Your bastard king himself, James Hansen, ADMITTED TO THIS.
And yet there has been zero warming SINCE THEN, too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.
Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? (La Jolla and La Jolla; Sydney and Sydney, respectively)? Funny how all the gauges show a 0.63mm/yr rise (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”
Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not fires. Ha! Not floods.
Not tornadoes. Five (nearly six now) consecutive years of below average events. Not hurricanes. Every single indicator shows they’re not only becoming less frequent, but also less powerful. Not even drought. Hilarious! So what is it? What’s worse? Tell us. Is it anything at all? Anywhere? At any time? No. Of course, this has been known for a while. It’s global cooling’s fault, after all! Oh, wait… NOAA wouldn’t want you to hear this now, would they?
Your narrative is predicated on laziness. Your narrative is predicated on people not doing their homework and not comprehending the data they see. Your narrative is predicated on appeals to authority and the expectation that your masters will never lie to you. That’s the only way it has ever existed.