Practice 30 moon landings with a simulator.
Change the gravity setting and successfully do it on the 31st try.
When Neil Armstrong did it, the final approach and landing were done "by the seat of your pants" --- there was no computer used. The de-orbit burn did use a primitive computer. The final approach and landing did not use a computer.
The craft was not flying (no air), it was translating.
There was no aerodynamic stability. - The was no aerodynamics.
When you successfully do it, post a screenshot. :)
No but millions of dollars in other gear much of it actual physical simulations
...and NASA wanted to shut down the LLRV/LLTV program....
WHY would NASA want to do that?
That just didn't make any sense if you were going to do a man guided moon landing.
NASA has been exposed many times using unknown and unproven data. I suggest that anything produced by them be scrutinized and then compared to other data sets.
The ones he crashed? --- using the same gravity he practiced with?
Well, I cannot play devils advocate forever here. I am not of the belief that the moon stuff went off as described. I cannot actually understand the loss of all the related materials and that alone forces me to hesitate in accepting anything.
Continue to add the constant stream of lies since then, I just reject anything that cannot be proven directly. So anything that is based on ideas or spin in a way then its just conjecture.
If we find that no one on the planet can recreate what Neil Armstrong did,
that would be a big fat red flag.
I don't think so no, he had a calculator and also a few base instruments, so with moderate talent this is how it is done.
If you know your vector and your velocity, then you should be in control.