a) only suggested information can be contradicted; not perceivable inspiration.
b) consenting to suggested information gives those suggesting the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) it.
c) utilizing implication (if/then) resists the temptation of reasoning (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; true vs false etc.) over suggested information; which in return grows ones awareness of suggested contradictions to both sides within the conflicts of reason.
a) only suggested information can be contradicted; not perceivable inspiration.
b) consenting to suggested information gives those suggesting the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) it.
c) utilizing implication (if/then) resists the temptation of reasoning (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; true vs false etc.) over suggested information; which in return grows ones awareness of suggested contradictions to both sides within the conflicts of reason.