You get stuck in perfecting the data.

I would not agree with this assessment, I am of the mind that if I can shoot more holes in it than a rusty can, it should have a better foundation prior to chasing it like there is some valid form of analysis available to improve upon.

we are just trying to see the concept to prove that heliocentric model is bullshit.

This is just as absurd as trying to disprove any other hypothetical/theoretical proposition, A model is generally a facsimile or an attempt at one, more likely its just a collection of ideas someone has proposed that others align to.

The entire process of scientific analysis is to begin with ideas and end with known measurable quantities that can be used to justify understanding.

When you have subjective matter you cannot speak definitively, you are left to query and hypothesize.

I never proclaimed to have studied all aspects of either of these 'models', you get really emotional and pick and choose where to insert broad strokes into my conveyance to you. Disparaging.