A likely explanation to the flatties
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
I am open to debate, but I will not debate false claims and propaganda. I am curious why evidence does not prove one way or the other.
There are many points made by people who choose to belief flat earth I do not agree with, that is fine. Being someone into flat earth implies there are many such beliefs associated and I am looking for the actual evidential points.
Not statements like, see? humans can't build big structures. yadda yadda.
So, when it comes to many of the flat earth propositions and the track record with the feds it is clear that it is used as a psyop to control and take time from people.
In this equation, we have more unknowns than knowns the result is, an estimate.
Does this not in itself prove to you that this is subjective analysis based on imaginary inputs and ideas? There is no way to produce this answer definitively, this is the exact reason why the current state of astrophysics is such a mess, we have all these people asserting they can calculate a thing and then with conviction make these claims to people to convey their own personal 'belief' regarding the information they have collected. This is not science, this is more like alchemy.
So, do people choose to 'believe' in science? absolutely, especially in astrophysics. But more importantly, it is this belief that drives one to form understandings and if you are not able to deduce your understanding from facts or evidence, then it remains a belief.
If you cannot find evidential proof then the odds are you are just dealing with guesswork, which is why any answer you find regarding this question is associated as such, just estimations based on what we think we know.