Just when will the western world come to accept the reality, continuing to push weapons and aggression at Russia over the ukraine conflict will continue to escalate, the final result will be large scale war in europe and likely north america.
Is this to be denied? did we ever consider that 'sanctions' and other medieval warfare practices would work in the modern world?
Does the west not realize they have inferior weapons and military equipment and standards when compared to basically all of the eastern world?
Russia and China have already called nato and usa terrorists, India called canada a terrorist very recently also.
Last year in december, when nato and usa laughed at the documents Russia presented, did anyone realize what the course of actions over the following years would be and what it would mean?
Are there people in the west that think there is an end game that results in the destruction of Russia and China and Iran and any other contenders? While the west prevails?
The problem of the West (Western elites, to be correct) is not in weapons, aggression, games, whatever. The Western elites problem is that they absolutely can't understand anything that is not follow their idea of society structure, layout and way of doing.
They absolutely can't understand Russia, they don't understand China, they can't understand any other country that is different to the West.
Yes, they are very dumb, and become angry and violent when they meet something they don't understand. And always try to destroy that. But since they don't understand what they want to destroy, they eventually get their asses kicked again and again.
IDK what to do with completely dumb, but highly aggressive idiot that trying to destroy everything he don't understand. I don't see any options except total extermination or total isolation from the world.
In any case, this shit would not be stopped until Western elites will be neutralised by whatever method. It is essential condition for the humanity survival and development, may be not sufficient, but absolutely essential.
Of course, other elites are definitely not a nice guys, but at least they are not behave like dumb idiot, and are able if not understand, but at least not become shit crazy if something in other country is different from their moral, political or social conceptions.
I really appreciate this perspective. I agree for the most part. Sadly, Because frankly it is not a good assessment.
This really reminds me of the way things used to be done, which is how we managed to progress for as long as we did until the great demise began, likely sometime in the late 1940's.
This is the worrying part, basically due to the actions of the western elites and the subjugation they have accepted for the nations they are currently occupy, the path is clear.
I am not looking for a nice guy, or a hero, just someone who uses their head and acts according to the position they are in and not some false leadership.
I have basically lived my entire life in the west without any idea what good leadership is. As I look back I can easily identify all the incorrect actions and failures of all western leaders as they bring the decline and the domination from the khazarians to bear.
When we kill our governments. Not before.
Well, sure. They work perfectly if you have an economic hegemony over the world’s GDP and the area being attacked is not a net fuel or food exporter. But Russia…
Uh… I do question that. I don’t question that the West would lose a war simply because they’ve replaced their command structure with faggots and trannies and women, and replaced their recruits with women and nonwhites who can’t pass the tests. Our equipment probably is better, we’re just incapable of using it anymore.
Yep. That’s WHY they did it.
All of them believe that, yeah.
I know it is tricky to really get a good view, especially considering all the fancy toys we see.
However, it simply comes down to missiles and there is no comparison.
Well I know this is not true, but I see what you mean by all, as in all of the others.
Good inputs
Lasers move faster than missiles.
good luck hitting my laser defended missiles with your meaningless laser, don't matter, just cause you hit a thing with a laser, does not mean it has an effect.
Not to mention, mobility location range and all that lovely laser stuff.
You can’t defend a missile with a laser. You can, however, hit one with one.
That’s why you kick it up into the multiple megawatt range, powered by the nuclear engine on a carrier, et. al.
Sorry, you are still confused. many materials and coatings circumvent the capability of the laser, think reflection.
Lasers are not effective, you will need to wait for plasma weapons.
So change the wavelength of the laser to render the reflective surface moot. So increase the power of the laser to create temperatures above the sublimation point of the reflective material. It’s a piece of cake to bypass. When you’re dealing with lasers, you just increase the power or change the wavelength and the problem solves itself. Plasma weapons are a literal fantasy, and they’re definitionally slower than lasers or missiles.
Laser defense is the final word in national security. Only asteroid redirection or “rods from god” can defeat it, but at that point you’re fucking over your own nation as much as your enemy, so it becomes moot again.
Let me know when we have these lasers do something effective I will be happy to have a look.
From what I understand it is out of reach, we have some small ones deployed for showing how they work on 'perfect targets' but the world does not work like that.
I am of the impression lasers in warfare are a fantasy; I've not seen anything to convince me otherwise.
Russia I heard has some that will zap a satellite but I have no evidence of that, in any regard they likely have a massive power plant and are firmly attached to the ground.
Yawn.
That is the MOST you have written in a few words...one..
Learning..
NOW, get over yourself.
Honestly, I was thankful that is all she provided, because frankly the view of this one is so off kilter, I would really think that someone needs to provide some more basis to reality in the real world for this one.
I have discussed this numerously. It is boring.
Do I agree with that assessment, no, I'm falling to sleep.
There's this person who thinks that zee nukes are coming. Zee nukes will kill all zee westerners. Because zee monkey people will inherit zee earth.
I mean come on. It's not quite like that. And it won't be.
Nobody wants to lose, they want to profit and control the outcome of war for their own gains and agendas.
I honestly cannot think of why they want to do that, it's much simpler to just nuke all zee monkey people's.
I mean seriously there is a danger of it escalating, but it will be a last resort. If it does. Instead it will drag until there's a truce. What truce will there be. They both get buffers, except for piggy in the middle, it's the buffer, and it has lost a few more ham slices. It can deal tomorrow. But it has another agenda. It's simply driving change. I mean look at it. Change occurs, more expensive electricity for the even more weathering Eeveees, because they really help the government, I meant the weather, Eeveees change the climate. Then the West gets to let India feed the World. But at least India can try to for a change, they're all vegans in India. No. But they want to be. Right?
Or did you think there's gonna be a bunch of nukes, because that's the best way to change things? No. I didn't think so. It use a catalyst, like war, to cause change.
If they were so serious about it. We'd be in war already, it's probably easier stealing the Russian gas, easier than driving Eevees. A computer does that.