You misunderstand how much he was liked. How much time he spent in the UK. How much commerce flowed between. He failed against the Germans. He was weak, lost control of population to Communism. Where did he die? Ukraine. I wonder about the feud now. What about the Baltics?
Knight of the garter isn't given away. Look at all the marriage in-between Monarchies.
Yes it all changed but was the to point to destroy him and replace him with the mob? I don't think so. The mob isn't controlled. It wasn't in France. It took wiping out Napoleon to achieve that.
Obviously they had their own designs. But I don't think the Russian Monarchy was completely it. He had Victorian favour.
Who knows and who cares. When opportunity arose they likely fueled it. Why not. It's an option. But I doubt it was the actual design. As a Monarch it could be your head next. If you let the mob win. Easier sending them off to war before they gain such idealism. The problem was how he ruled.
It's probably a bunch of factors ike counterplay, history, and agenda.
I can only speculate like everybody else.
But it is kinda obvious. Agenda, Eeveee climate technology, counterplay contain Russia by buffer etc, history always goes back to former relationships, and territory. Of course history has changed. But there's always feuds to ignite from opposing claims and interests.
Who knows fully? Except that which is otherwise obvious.
Today there's new technology being inserted from an agenda to cause change, it causes counterplays often to contain the competition by changing methods, and history always repeats itself.
But unless you know everything there is only speculation.
Speculation today is it is getting really grim quicker. Collapse is happening, and it often forces change, and conflict is occurring. It often being the catalyst for collapse to cause change. But is it controlled as easily? Is it really that simple?
You misunderstand how much he was liked. How much time he spent in the UK. How much commerce flowed between. He failed against the Germans. He was weak, lost control of population to Communism. Where did he die? Ukraine. I wonder about the feud now. What about the Baltics?
Knight of the garter isn't given away. Look at all the marriage in-between Monarchies.
Yes it all changed but was the to point to destroy him and replace him with the mob? I don't think so. The mob isn't controlled. It wasn't in France. It took wiping out Napoleon to achieve that.
Obviously they had their own designs. But I don't think the Russian Monarchy was completely it. He had Victorian favour.
Who knows and who cares. When opportunity arose they likely fueled it. Why not. It's an option. But I doubt it was the actual design. As a Monarch it could be your head next. If you let the mob win. Easier sending them off to war before they gain such idealism. The problem was how he ruled.
It's probably a bunch of factors ike counterplay, history, and agenda.
I can only speculate like everybody else.
But it is kinda obvious. Agenda, Eeveee climate technology, counterplay contain Russia by buffer etc, history always goes back to former relationships, and territory. Of course history has changed. But there's always feuds to ignite from opposing claims and interests.
Who knows fully? Except that which is otherwise obvious.
Today there's new technology being inserted from an agenda to cause change, it causes counterplays often to contain the competition by changing methods, and history always repeats itself.
But unless you know everything there is only speculation.
Speculation today is it is getting really grim quicker. Collapse is happening, and it often forces change, and conflict is occurring. It often being the catalyst for collapse to cause change. But is it controlled as easily? Is it really that simple?
You're asking the wrong person.