You say that as though those numbers mean anything. It never has to be paid. By design it can never be paid. If the debt was one cent, it would be unpayable.
It was expected. But if this wave current draft fails. It'll go to nukes. Russia won't have many options left. It's public image will be crushed until it presses the win button. Only danger here is it fails. It won't lose at home.
This draft will keep conscripting. In fact many won't make the front lines. More will be mobilised into production, output for war.
Mobilisation also means full on supply lines to the war effort. I would be surprised if other satellites won't also be adding to this.
I am surprised it has taken this long. Winter looms. Becoming immediate. Previous was geopolitical and not great in summer. Effectively it has taken time. They left more time for an opponent.
Yawn. It's war. Nothing more. You're not fighting it. If you were? You'd either be a coward or a patriot. The design is always from opportunity and agenda. But it's a sacrifice to any objectives. They are often duty.
However you're condemning those efforts? As some other ritual. But they won't lose and walk away. You're missing the severity of it.
This is Russia was always Russia. To be defeated at home would be unthinkable for it. It ain't somewhere else like Afghanistan.
Yes geopolitically has incited heaps of opposition and agenda.
But what result do you forsee?
Somebody will lose here, or terms will be drawn up. Those terms are no where near to being agreed. In the meantime it runs a greater risk of a larger war.
While it drags it has caused and prompted a chain of events that are profiting and inciting change. How much more does the West get involved? If it does it gets direct.
There are only so many scenarios where Russia can lose.
Withdrawal not likely without substantial loss, not after it has mobilised. Head of state being replaced and a failure adopts a different approach. Not really after mobilising. Protocol runs mostly the same until it goes back to its assembly. But it has mobilised. In Russian it's quite unthinkable. Historically it has been bloodied far worse, and kept fighting. Technically it hasn't even begun to commit too those margins.
So a truce will have to be agreed and one Russia has an advantage or it will press until it cannot. It historically has often meant to the last recruit. We aren't talking Afghanistan here. It was completely different. It wasn't at home.
There is as you say a vastly different strategy being played out. Where as this drags it incites change and technology from competing opportunity. It is suspect. Does it simply drag until terms declare another Cold War. Carving up the hog sacrificed, Ukraine? Or will it all erupt. That danger sooner drags far more conflict into it.
Overthrow our respective governments before they get us all killed. If the last two years have shown us anything, it’s that they all do more harm than good. They’re less than worthless. Get rid of them. Its easier than people think too. General strikes are very effective. Can’t fight a war with no money or recruits.
That’s exactly it. To claim otherwise would require proof of the literal planning of minuscule events that were either unpredictable or were random chance across 50 years in the future.
95B away from 31T national debt.
No way possible to pay it down.
Quid pro quo?
War. The only option given.
When all else fails, they take us to war.
This time around it will make its way here.
You say that as though those numbers mean anything. It never has to be paid. By design it can never be paid. If the debt was one cent, it would be unpayable.
Other than the holocaust, this is the major 'red pill'.
IF all debts were paid off there would not be one penny in circulation.
Simply because money issued by the FED IS DEBT.
Right, but all debts cannot be paid off, because there is more than one dollar of debt for every dollar that exists.
You're alive. I'm in 24.
It was expected. But if this wave current draft fails. It'll go to nukes. Russia won't have many options left. It's public image will be crushed until it presses the win button. Only danger here is it fails. It won't lose at home.
This draft will keep conscripting. In fact many won't make the front lines. More will be mobilised into production, output for war.
Mobilisation also means full on supply lines to the war effort. I would be surprised if other satellites won't also be adding to this.
I am surprised it has taken this long. Winter looms. Becoming immediate. Previous was geopolitical and not great in summer. Effectively it has taken time. They left more time for an opponent.
Eyes on US Selective Services.
Yawn. It's war. Nothing more. You're not fighting it. If you were? You'd either be a coward or a patriot. The design is always from opportunity and agenda. But it's a sacrifice to any objectives. They are often duty.
However you're condemning those efforts? As some other ritual. But they won't lose and walk away. You're missing the severity of it.
This is Russia was always Russia. To be defeated at home would be unthinkable for it. It ain't somewhere else like Afghanistan.
Yes geopolitically has incited heaps of opposition and agenda.
But what result do you forsee?
Somebody will lose here, or terms will be drawn up. Those terms are no where near to being agreed. In the meantime it runs a greater risk of a larger war.
While it drags it has caused and prompted a chain of events that are profiting and inciting change. How much more does the West get involved? If it does it gets direct.
There are only so many scenarios where Russia can lose.
Withdrawal not likely without substantial loss, not after it has mobilised. Head of state being replaced and a failure adopts a different approach. Not really after mobilising. Protocol runs mostly the same until it goes back to its assembly. But it has mobilised. In Russian it's quite unthinkable. Historically it has been bloodied far worse, and kept fighting. Technically it hasn't even begun to commit too those margins.
So a truce will have to be agreed and one Russia has an advantage or it will press until it cannot. It historically has often meant to the last recruit. We aren't talking Afghanistan here. It was completely different. It wasn't at home.
There is as you say a vastly different strategy being played out. Where as this drags it incites change and technology from competing opportunity. It is suspect. Does it simply drag until terms declare another Cold War. Carving up the hog sacrificed, Ukraine? Or will it all erupt. That danger sooner drags far more conflict into it.
How does 0 Hedge make money?
Ads. Get hit with a paywall ad every article I open.
Also have 2 tier subscription service.
There is a way out of this…
Overthrow our respective governments before they get us all killed. If the last two years have shown us anything, it’s that they all do more harm than good. They’re less than worthless. Get rid of them. Its easier than people think too. General strikes are very effective. Can’t fight a war with no money or recruits.
He never said it. The words in the “quote” weren’t even invented for decades.
That’s exactly it. To claim otherwise would require proof of the literal planning of minuscule events that were either unpredictable or were random chance across 50 years in the future.