Ohio State was the one that passed laws making hotels that sex trafficers use able to be charged as acomplises. He's once again catering to his audience.
a) who deals more drugs than the pharmaceutical industrial complex and who traffics more humans than the United Nations (formerly the zionist League of Nations) and their Replacement Migration agenda?
b) PEN'ALTY, noun - "the suffering to which a person subjects himself by covenant or agreement, for non-compliance with an agreement; as the penalty of a bond"
If one consents to RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" aka those who bind themselves through choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law onto others...aren't they already suffering the consequences of ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want)?
What if those making the suggestions are tempting others to suffer themselves; while also penalizing them for doing it?
c) if the living are bound to the process of dying; then does non-compliance imply a death-penalty for the living? Also do the living have the choice to non-comply with the process of dying?
Ohio State was the one that passed laws making hotels that sex trafficers use able to be charged as acomplises. He's once again catering to his audience.
Trump pardoned 20 or so drug dealers, some of massive amounts of cocaine and money laundering.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_granted_executive_clemency_by_Donald_Trump
I guess some might be miscarriages of justice.
Pardons are supposed to be so your political enemies can't just lock up your team forever.
a) who deals more drugs than the pharmaceutical industrial complex and who traffics more humans than the United Nations (formerly the zionist League of Nations) and their Replacement Migration agenda?
b) PEN'ALTY, noun - "the suffering to which a person subjects himself by covenant or agreement, for non-compliance with an agreement; as the penalty of a bond"
If one consents to RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" aka those who bind themselves through choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law onto others...aren't they already suffering the consequences of ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want)?
What if those making the suggestions are tempting others to suffer themselves; while also penalizing them for doing it?
c) if the living are bound to the process of dying; then does non-compliance imply a death-penalty for the living? Also do the living have the choice to non-comply with the process of dying?