Topically we are debating if there will be a newer mint recognising the King on its tender. Undoubtedly. It after coronation sometimes prior becomes another formality of the crown.
What is being proposed however is bullshit. But not improbable. The Euro, Dollar, and Sterling are trading very close to the same value. It means exactly what as we progress into the future? God forbid today. But cashless is a word that holds little recognition towards the tender being exchanged. It often simply provides credit for further debts. I don't know why you'd get excited by it.
A cashless society? I doubt it, but I don't discard it.
However if going by history is the simple recognition of the tender held and exchanged. It changes to match the current head of state, or the crown. It therefore puts the king on its face, and that is a process taking time. Older tender isn't worthless for a number of years. But it simply and slowly changes into the current tender minted and the duties that are provided. It provides value, more so to many collectors away from any exchange. This has happened since currency, and their heads of state, going back to Roman Emperors. Perhaps there's taxation, but it occurs regardless of any tender used.
September 30th. Tic toc goes the CBDC clock
Literally the same group of people supporting both agendas and yet you don't see the connection? What would you say it is you do here?
Yet somehow you're the only one who send to have a problem. Having a hard time processing things that aren't in your approved script?
Having a hard time interpreting? Maybe you should stick to your list of "reliable sources"
A formality, yes it should be minted. Not for cashless. But for value. Any coins now become collectable value.
The Anthem has changed as well as a host of formalities that crown provides, stamps are another.
It draws value. It also keeps the dating current. Up to date within the times lived in.
Never cashless there is no value.
Worse than "no value". On the negative side:
...and that's just what .gov can do 'for' us. I'm sure the hackers and scammers can figure out other methods for mischief.
I don't understand a word of that.
Topically we are debating if there will be a newer mint recognising the King on its tender. Undoubtedly. It after coronation sometimes prior becomes another formality of the crown.
What is being proposed however is bullshit. But not improbable. The Euro, Dollar, and Sterling are trading very close to the same value. It means exactly what as we progress into the future? God forbid today. But cashless is a word that holds little recognition towards the tender being exchanged. It often simply provides credit for further debts. I don't know why you'd get excited by it.
A cashless society? I doubt it, but I don't discard it.
However if going by history is the simple recognition of the tender held and exchanged. It changes to match the current head of state, or the crown. It therefore puts the king on its face, and that is a process taking time. Older tender isn't worthless for a number of years. But it simply and slowly changes into the current tender minted and the duties that are provided. It provides value, more so to many collectors away from any exchange. This has happened since currency, and their heads of state, going back to Roman Emperors. Perhaps there's taxation, but it occurs regardless of any tender used.
Every single time.