Adapt into what origin? You're creating an oxymoron. Live to die. Quickly cut. Or die to live. Cut to survive. Neither, it's often simple technology paying him more for any attempt. It has outpaced the population funding it. Hence a bottleneck. It changing. In any event a few years later there will be another asshole like him no matter what. Humans will populate no matter what he decides. So if he's suggesting the bonfires, surely shouldn't he be their first offering?
But you feel there's some other urgency today. The weather is coming, and the sky is falling on our heads, because it's changing. It does anyway. No matter what he does. Our species will populate back on the Volcano anyway. Just be sure to drive an EV. It helps stop the Volcano. No, what?
If within motion (process of dying); then need for adaptation (living).
If within balance (action); then need for choice (reaction).
If within flow (inception towards death); then need for form (life).
If within perceivable (whole); then need for perceiving (partial).
Change your perspective from "adaptation into origin" to being within (living) therefore the adaptation to origin (process of dying).
You're creating an oxymoron
What if you consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing); while ignoring perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything)? How could one perceive anything without being within everything perceivable?
What if every suggested word tempts one to ignore perceivable sound; hence questioning "contrary signification" (oxymoron) of suggested meaning?
Live to die. Quickly cut. Or die to live. Cut to survive
Living to die represents the choice of the living to want suggested outcomes (aiming towards death); while ignoring the need to respond (as choice) to origin (balance) for the sustenance of life.
Die to live represents transmutation of flow (inception towards death) into form (life) aka from the ongoing into the temporary aka from whole into partial aka from base into ingredient.
Living represents response-ability (choice) within the momentum (balance) of temptation (dying) aka resistance (growth) within the momentum of velocity (loss). Both together (loss/growth in coexistence as balance) represent EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Notice that the living cannot "survive" the process of dying, hence only temporary exist within the ongoing aka as growth within loss; as resistance within velocity; as response-ability (need) within temptation (want).
Also question if the temporary living can "quickly cut" the ongoing process of dying or only their own life short by willingly ignoring to fucking grow it?
Neither, it's often simple technology paying him more for any attempt
a) if one attempts the suggestions by others (technology); then one is tempted to ignore everything perceivable (inspiration) for the suggested (information).
b) check this out...TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Greek art, and word or discourse.] - "an explanation of the terms of the arts" aka artificial words suggested to tempt one to ignore; naturally, perceivable sound.
But you feel there's some other urgency today. The weather is coming, and the sky is falling on our heads, because it's changing.
Living within the process of dying implies being within constant change. It's all the suggested words; which tempts one to reason about affixed meaning (information); while ignoring to adapt to the perceivable flow of inspiration from all the moving differences perceived by ones senses.
Hold your breath and wait...the "urge" represents an impressing system; which those within adapt to by compression (inhale) and expression (exhale). Notice the urge to adapt when holding your breath...that's the enacting origin for your reactions; yet you're tempted by the suggested reactions from all the other ones to ignore that. They can even go so far as to suggest you to "put a mask over your nose and mouth"; while simultaneously reveal to you that "I can't breathe" leads to death.
That represents spiritual warfare by means of suggestion; hence SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe]
shouldn't he be their first offering?
What can those perceiving offer, that wasn't already perceivable beforehand? Only if one ignores perceivable can other ones "offer" suggested.
You asked me a question. I gave an answer. But it was an oxymoron.
Adapted into what origin? Humanity goes through the same motions. It's a pattern. It happens every single time. Every single time a bottleneck occurs. Technology outpaces population. It is blamed on everything else except the technology being forced. It as per previous occurrences sooner results in depopulation. Until they sooner repopulate and do it all over again.
Adapted into what origin. New technology. Undoubtedly. Until it severely affects them. No sooner are they back at it again.
Do you think this topical idiot can control humanity? For how long. Seriously. It's the same history repeated a thousand times. Even if there were 10 humans left at the end of that result. 1000 years later there would be millions then billions more. But throughout it there would be thousands of this topical idiot saying the same thing. How he wanted to control them for his own gain, how he wanted to limit them. How he needs to sell them something else. If and when nature their own or this planet answers his woeful musings. It would be the same thing all over again.
Hence the oxymoron proposed but you answered with something else. It really makes no difference. Chuck him on the bonfire first. It's what he's suggesting.
The motion (inception towards death) implies sameness; those within (life) represent differentiation. That which differentiates the whole flow (inception towards death) into partial form (life) represents momentum. Velocity causes momentum; within which temporary resistance (growth) can coexist within ongoing velocity (loss).
The moment (um) one exists in prevents one from perceiving sameness; which can only be comprehended (growth) by adaptation to perceivable differences (loss). Choice exists at the center of growth/loss balance.
It's a pattern
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original or model proposed for imitation".
a) perceivable inspiration represents original; suggested information represents a model within the original.
b) the original (process of dying) doesn't proposed imitation to those living within; it inspires resistance (living) within temptation (dying) through adaptation to constant change.
c) pattern recognition within perceivable inspiration requires the use of memory (conscious mind) as a ram for adaptation to the constant flow of inspiration. Pattern recognition within suggested information tempts the misuse of memory as a hard-drive for accumulation of suggested information.
This self restriction of pattern recognition within ones own memory, allows others to shape patterns within memory by the use of suggested information. This is how the few tempt the many into cyclical thinking aka KIKE; noun - "circle; ring; a visible sign of an invisible bond; no beginning; no end".
This self destructive thinking (representing the self eating ouroboros) tempts the many to ignore both origin and outcome for suggested origin (his-story; response to memory; nostalgia; past etc.) and suggested outcomes (hope; fear; alternatives; goals; salvation; paradise; future etc.)
It happens every single time
Every single one exists as a difference (living) within the momentum of the same motion (process of dying). It's the suggestion of past; present and future as "time" which tempts one to ignore being within the ever changing moment.
The sleight of hand for this represents the clock aka tick; tick; tick...that's perceivable momentum; not the suggested states of past; present and future. One can only exist "now".
If one ignores that which is (momentum) for what others suggest was (past); will be (future) and through those define what is (present); then one consents to self inflicted trauma aka loss (past); stress (present) and hope/fear (future).
Take your biggest loss; your most stress and the biggest hopes and fears you hold onto; then look at any other life-form sharing a habitat with you and ask yourself if they're affected by any of them as you are?
Sleight of hand:
"In your head, in your head...Zombie, zombie, zombie-ie-ie"..."What's in your head, in your head?...Zombie, zombie, zombie-ie-ie-ie, oh" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ejga4kJUts
"Your empty walls, your empty walls"..."Pretentious attention, dismissive apprehension"..."Don't waste your time on coffins today"..."When we decline from the confines of our mind" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CxKA1uETxE
Technology outpaces population
Suggested artificial (technology) tempts the many to ignore resisting the natural (process of dying); hence declining in population (living); which allows those suggesting the artificial to define; redefine and contradict it; hence rolling it out cyclically, while running their civilization/nation-wrecking rackets.
Every single time a bottleneck occurs.
Flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents even to odd to even...no bottlenecks. It's a wave-pattern aka growth within loss aka ingredient (living) out of base (process of dying). The choice to ignore this puts the kike (bottleneck) around ones neck.
It is blamed on everything else except the technology being forced.
Question "being forced"...if being moved from inception towards death represents the force of velocity; then those living within represent the force of resistance. If then the few suggest the many to ignore resisting (by suggesting them to follow along); then the few can use rules enforced upon mind (aka law enforcement) to control and direct the ignorant many.
Those who shirk response-ability (choice of resistance) are tempted to blame others for the consequences of ignorance. The parasitic few not only suggest boogeymen to blame; but also cloak themselves as the persecuted being blamed for everything.
It as per previous occurrences sooner results in depopulation.
The previous occurrences represent the his-story as suggested by the few; not your story as the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying). You represent the accumulation of all that was; the temporary one that is and the choice to shape all that will be, yet ignoring this for the suggested his-story by others...results in depopulation.
Until they sooner repopulate and do it all over again
RE (response to) POPULANCE (multitude of persons) -ATION (through action) implies responding as reacting choice to enacting sound (per sonos aka by sound); hence having the choice of resonance (need to adapt to perceivable) or dissonance (want to consent to suggested).
The main deception within your line of thinking represents the suggested AGAIN, adverb [Latin con, whence contra] - "a second time". There's no second stage to energy. Every different one within energy represents the self differentiation of the whole energy. An ongoing system (loss) causing temporary existence (growth) at its center aka the utilization of reacting growth to self sustain enacting loss aka a balance of action/reaction as the internal powers of energy (work).
Reality isn't occurring over and over again; those within reality come in and out of it; while lacking to comprehend what they're perceiving unless choosing to grow it. Meanwhile: the foundation of temporary growth (ongoing loss) is tempting ignorance; while the suggesting choices of others exploit ignorance of perceivable; hence allowing the few to industrialize temptation against the many who're willingly ignore resisting temptation.
New technology. Undoubtedly
"there's nothing new under the sun". Any artificial suggestion is being shaped out of perceivable origin. One represents a finite partial within an infinite whole.
The rhetorical revisionism of new is based upon...new, néwos, now. The ever changing momentum (now) represents ongoing sameness causing temporary differentiation (choice) within momentum (balance).
DOUBT, verb - "to waver or fluctuate in opinion; to hesitate". Ones hesitation to adapt to ongoing motion represents the choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want). The status quo of ones existence implies being a fluctuating waveform aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death). One needs to adapt to being; not reason about how others suggest one to be.
Do you think this topical idiot can control humanity? For how long. Seriously.
All control by others is based upon exploiting ignorance about ones temporary state. How long for the living implies from inception towards death, and instead of trying to watch over the living; the few suggest the living to consent to dying by tempting them to consent to progressivism (outcome orientation) over resistance (adaptation to origin). This way the many don't need to be controlled on their one way path towards death; only distracted from resisting, while occasional hammered back into following the mainstream; the party-line; the suggested orders; the chain of command; the rat race; the NPC programming etc.
the same history repeated
Because the parasitic few suggest his-story as a mimicry of sameness, as to distract each ONE of the many from being and expressing differentiation. The few suggest the rhetoric of diversity (difference) for equality (sameness) as the inversion of being different (living) within sameness (process of dying); which would imply the struggle to resist assimilation.
Meanwhile; the parasitic few utilize e pluribus unum (out of many; one) for mass assimilation; for miscegenation; for "united" nations; for "united" states"; for european "union".
Sleight of hand: "There comes a time when we heed a certain call"..."When the world must come together as one"..."Let's realize that a change can only come"..."When we stand together as one"..."We are the world..."
1000 years later there would be millions then billions more.
The numbers are suggested to distract; discourage; disable each ONE (number; unit; unus) from comprehending being a temporary reactor within an ongoing generator aka finite potential existing at the center of infinite potentiality. You represent the less within the more with the choice to grow; other suggest you everything they can to tempt you to ignore growing.
this topical idiot saying the same thing
a) everything said represents a difference, because every "one" saying it represents a difference from the "one" consenting to it.
b) saying suggested words tempts others to ignore perceivable sound. Those who ignore sound (origin) for word (substitute) are being tempted to ignore resonance (need) for dissonance (want) aka being choice within perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want versus not want). This conflict about suggested is called "reasoning" and the few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning; while simultaneously herd them together in their ignorance of being apart (partial within whole).
he wanted to limit them
a) suggested want tempts choice to ignore perceivable need.
b) being "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom implies being free to choose within the limitation of balance. Only at the center of balance can there be choice, and only within motion can there be momentum (balance).
If and when nature...
Nature (born; produced) represents implication (if/then) for those within. Meanwhile; "when" represents suggested outcomes tempting those within predefined origin to ignore perceivable. Being alive implies that if inception; then death for those living in-between. Reasoning about when tempts one to ignore growing life until predefined outcome, within the process of dying.
this planet
Planet represents a suggested state; plane represents a perceivable state. Standing on a ball (heliocentric) still implies the perceivable plane for the ball to roll on. On the other hand....the suggestion of "flat" tempts one to ignore perceivable waveform aka temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
Think temporary sinus curvature within ongoing baseline; but expand the baseline so that the sinus curvature exists within it aka both loss/growth happen within the whole aka a self differentiation of energy with each one partial at the center of the whole.
It's what he's suggesting.
That implies your consent to the suggestions of others; while ignoring perceivable. I adapt to perceivable inspiration (need); while resisting others suggesting me information (want)...which represents my free will of choice. I can't make that choice for others, and using suggestion only tempts others to keep ignoring perceivable.
Can the reactions (living) within an enacting system (process of dying) define "need" for each other or do they need to adapt to origin?
Adapt into what origin? You're creating an oxymoron. Live to die. Quickly cut. Or die to live. Cut to survive. Neither, it's often simple technology paying him more for any attempt. It has outpaced the population funding it. Hence a bottleneck. It changing. In any event a few years later there will be another asshole like him no matter what. Humans will populate no matter what he decides. So if he's suggesting the bonfires, surely shouldn't he be their first offering?
But you feel there's some other urgency today. The weather is coming, and the sky is falling on our heads, because it's changing. It does anyway. No matter what he does. Our species will populate back on the Volcano anyway. Just be sure to drive an EV. It helps stop the Volcano. No, what?
If within motion (process of dying); then need for adaptation (living).
If within balance (action); then need for choice (reaction).
If within flow (inception towards death); then need for form (life).
If within perceivable (whole); then need for perceiving (partial).
Change your perspective from "adaptation into origin" to being within (living) therefore the adaptation to origin (process of dying).
What if you consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing); while ignoring perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything)? How could one perceive anything without being within everything perceivable?
What if every suggested word tempts one to ignore perceivable sound; hence questioning "contrary signification" (oxymoron) of suggested meaning?
Living to die represents the choice of the living to want suggested outcomes (aiming towards death); while ignoring the need to respond (as choice) to origin (balance) for the sustenance of life.
Die to live represents transmutation of flow (inception towards death) into form (life) aka from the ongoing into the temporary aka from whole into partial aka from base into ingredient.
Living represents response-ability (choice) within the momentum (balance) of temptation (dying) aka resistance (growth) within the momentum of velocity (loss). Both together (loss/growth in coexistence as balance) represent EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Notice that the living cannot "survive" the process of dying, hence only temporary exist within the ongoing aka as growth within loss; as resistance within velocity; as response-ability (need) within temptation (want).
Also question if the temporary living can "quickly cut" the ongoing process of dying or only their own life short by willingly ignoring to fucking grow it?
a) if one attempts the suggestions by others (technology); then one is tempted to ignore everything perceivable (inspiration) for the suggested (information).
b) check this out...TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Greek art, and word or discourse.] - "an explanation of the terms of the arts" aka artificial words suggested to tempt one to ignore; naturally, perceivable sound.
Living within the process of dying implies being within constant change. It's all the suggested words; which tempts one to reason about affixed meaning (information); while ignoring to adapt to the perceivable flow of inspiration from all the moving differences perceived by ones senses.
Hold your breath and wait...the "urge" represents an impressing system; which those within adapt to by compression (inhale) and expression (exhale). Notice the urge to adapt when holding your breath...that's the enacting origin for your reactions; yet you're tempted by the suggested reactions from all the other ones to ignore that. They can even go so far as to suggest you to "put a mask over your nose and mouth"; while simultaneously reveal to you that "I can't breathe" leads to death.
That represents spiritual warfare by means of suggestion; hence SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe]
What can those perceiving offer, that wasn't already perceivable beforehand? Only if one ignores perceivable can other ones "offer" suggested.
I haven't got the foggiest. Nope.
You asked me a question. I gave an answer. But it was an oxymoron.
Adapted into what origin? Humanity goes through the same motions. It's a pattern. It happens every single time. Every single time a bottleneck occurs. Technology outpaces population. It is blamed on everything else except the technology being forced. It as per previous occurrences sooner results in depopulation. Until they sooner repopulate and do it all over again.
Adapted into what origin. New technology. Undoubtedly. Until it severely affects them. No sooner are they back at it again.
Do you think this topical idiot can control humanity? For how long. Seriously. It's the same history repeated a thousand times. Even if there were 10 humans left at the end of that result. 1000 years later there would be millions then billions more. But throughout it there would be thousands of this topical idiot saying the same thing. How he wanted to control them for his own gain, how he wanted to limit them. How he needs to sell them something else. If and when nature their own or this planet answers his woeful musings. It would be the same thing all over again.
Hence the oxymoron proposed but you answered with something else. It really makes no difference. Chuck him on the bonfire first. It's what he's suggesting.
The motion (inception towards death) implies sameness; those within (life) represent differentiation. That which differentiates the whole flow (inception towards death) into partial form (life) represents momentum. Velocity causes momentum; within which temporary resistance (growth) can coexist within ongoing velocity (loss).
The moment (um) one exists in prevents one from perceiving sameness; which can only be comprehended (growth) by adaptation to perceivable differences (loss). Choice exists at the center of growth/loss balance.
a) perceivable inspiration represents original; suggested information represents a model within the original.
b) the original (process of dying) doesn't proposed imitation to those living within; it inspires resistance (living) within temptation (dying) through adaptation to constant change.
c) pattern recognition within perceivable inspiration requires the use of memory (conscious mind) as a ram for adaptation to the constant flow of inspiration. Pattern recognition within suggested information tempts the misuse of memory as a hard-drive for accumulation of suggested information.
This self restriction of pattern recognition within ones own memory, allows others to shape patterns within memory by the use of suggested information. This is how the few tempt the many into cyclical thinking aka KIKE; noun - "circle; ring; a visible sign of an invisible bond; no beginning; no end".
This self destructive thinking (representing the self eating ouroboros) tempts the many to ignore both origin and outcome for suggested origin (his-story; response to memory; nostalgia; past etc.) and suggested outcomes (hope; fear; alternatives; goals; salvation; paradise; future etc.)
Every single one exists as a difference (living) within the momentum of the same motion (process of dying). It's the suggestion of past; present and future as "time" which tempts one to ignore being within the ever changing moment.
The sleight of hand for this represents the clock aka tick; tick; tick...that's perceivable momentum; not the suggested states of past; present and future. One can only exist "now".
If one ignores that which is (momentum) for what others suggest was (past); will be (future) and through those define what is (present); then one consents to self inflicted trauma aka loss (past); stress (present) and hope/fear (future).
Take your biggest loss; your most stress and the biggest hopes and fears you hold onto; then look at any other life-form sharing a habitat with you and ask yourself if they're affected by any of them as you are?
Sleight of hand:
"In your head, in your head...Zombie, zombie, zombie-ie-ie"..."What's in your head, in your head?...Zombie, zombie, zombie-ie-ie-ie, oh" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ejga4kJUts
"Your empty walls, your empty walls"..."Pretentious attention, dismissive apprehension"..."Don't waste your time on coffins today"..."When we decline from the confines of our mind" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CxKA1uETxE
Suggested artificial (technology) tempts the many to ignore resisting the natural (process of dying); hence declining in population (living); which allows those suggesting the artificial to define; redefine and contradict it; hence rolling it out cyclically, while running their civilization/nation-wrecking rackets.
Flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents even to odd to even...no bottlenecks. It's a wave-pattern aka growth within loss aka ingredient (living) out of base (process of dying). The choice to ignore this puts the kike (bottleneck) around ones neck.
Question "being forced"...if being moved from inception towards death represents the force of velocity; then those living within represent the force of resistance. If then the few suggest the many to ignore resisting (by suggesting them to follow along); then the few can use rules enforced upon mind (aka law enforcement) to control and direct the ignorant many.
Those who shirk response-ability (choice of resistance) are tempted to blame others for the consequences of ignorance. The parasitic few not only suggest boogeymen to blame; but also cloak themselves as the persecuted being blamed for everything.
The previous occurrences represent the his-story as suggested by the few; not your story as the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying). You represent the accumulation of all that was; the temporary one that is and the choice to shape all that will be, yet ignoring this for the suggested his-story by others...results in depopulation.
RE (response to) POPULANCE (multitude of persons) -ATION (through action) implies responding as reacting choice to enacting sound (per sonos aka by sound); hence having the choice of resonance (need to adapt to perceivable) or dissonance (want to consent to suggested).
The main deception within your line of thinking represents the suggested AGAIN, adverb [Latin con, whence contra] - "a second time". There's no second stage to energy. Every different one within energy represents the self differentiation of the whole energy. An ongoing system (loss) causing temporary existence (growth) at its center aka the utilization of reacting growth to self sustain enacting loss aka a balance of action/reaction as the internal powers of energy (work).
Reality isn't occurring over and over again; those within reality come in and out of it; while lacking to comprehend what they're perceiving unless choosing to grow it. Meanwhile: the foundation of temporary growth (ongoing loss) is tempting ignorance; while the suggesting choices of others exploit ignorance of perceivable; hence allowing the few to industrialize temptation against the many who're willingly ignore resisting temptation.
"there's nothing new under the sun". Any artificial suggestion is being shaped out of perceivable origin. One represents a finite partial within an infinite whole.
The rhetorical revisionism of new is based upon...new, néwos, now. The ever changing momentum (now) represents ongoing sameness causing temporary differentiation (choice) within momentum (balance).
DOUBT, verb - "to waver or fluctuate in opinion; to hesitate". Ones hesitation to adapt to ongoing motion represents the choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want). The status quo of ones existence implies being a fluctuating waveform aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death). One needs to adapt to being; not reason about how others suggest one to be.
All control by others is based upon exploiting ignorance about ones temporary state. How long for the living implies from inception towards death, and instead of trying to watch over the living; the few suggest the living to consent to dying by tempting them to consent to progressivism (outcome orientation) over resistance (adaptation to origin). This way the many don't need to be controlled on their one way path towards death; only distracted from resisting, while occasional hammered back into following the mainstream; the party-line; the suggested orders; the chain of command; the rat race; the NPC programming etc.
Because the parasitic few suggest his-story as a mimicry of sameness, as to distract each ONE of the many from being and expressing differentiation. The few suggest the rhetoric of diversity (difference) for equality (sameness) as the inversion of being different (living) within sameness (process of dying); which would imply the struggle to resist assimilation.
Meanwhile; the parasitic few utilize e pluribus unum (out of many; one) for mass assimilation; for miscegenation; for "united" nations; for "united" states"; for european "union".
Sleight of hand: "There comes a time when we heed a certain call"..."When the world must come together as one"..."Let's realize that a change can only come"..."When we stand together as one"..."We are the world..."
The numbers are suggested to distract; discourage; disable each ONE (number; unit; unus) from comprehending being a temporary reactor within an ongoing generator aka finite potential existing at the center of infinite potentiality. You represent the less within the more with the choice to grow; other suggest you everything they can to tempt you to ignore growing.
a) everything said represents a difference, because every "one" saying it represents a difference from the "one" consenting to it.
b) saying suggested words tempts others to ignore perceivable sound. Those who ignore sound (origin) for word (substitute) are being tempted to ignore resonance (need) for dissonance (want) aka being choice within perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want versus not want). This conflict about suggested is called "reasoning" and the few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning; while simultaneously herd them together in their ignorance of being apart (partial within whole).
a) suggested want tempts choice to ignore perceivable need.
b) being "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom implies being free to choose within the limitation of balance. Only at the center of balance can there be choice, and only within motion can there be momentum (balance).
Nature (born; produced) represents implication (if/then) for those within. Meanwhile; "when" represents suggested outcomes tempting those within predefined origin to ignore perceivable. Being alive implies that if inception; then death for those living in-between. Reasoning about when tempts one to ignore growing life until predefined outcome, within the process of dying.
Planet represents a suggested state; plane represents a perceivable state. Standing on a ball (heliocentric) still implies the perceivable plane for the ball to roll on. On the other hand....the suggestion of "flat" tempts one to ignore perceivable waveform aka temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
Think temporary sinus curvature within ongoing baseline; but expand the baseline so that the sinus curvature exists within it aka both loss/growth happen within the whole aka a self differentiation of energy with each one partial at the center of the whole.
That implies your consent to the suggestions of others; while ignoring perceivable. I adapt to perceivable inspiration (need); while resisting others suggesting me information (want)...which represents my free will of choice. I can't make that choice for others, and using suggestion only tempts others to keep ignoring perceivable.