The third world isn't taking over unless unclear war occurs. Then it still ain't taking over. You're missing the point today. The entire point.

If the West slices its wrist who really bleeds. The third World. There's a huge run off. Cutting food production in the West faster causes famines globally. Cutting trade where Western markets are in recession, causes all the factories of cheap third world workers not to get paid.

Has it hurt the West. Not really. Of course its poorest feel it more, much more. Its citizens aren't happy about the escalating costs. But comparatively how much run off everywhere else has been caused? Not to the same margins. Not even slightly.

So no the third World aren't taking over shit. All because the West want to cut its wrists, trimming some fat.

The problem becomes does the unrest spill, and to what extent. Conflict certainly increases, internal protest, perhaps anarchy. Can it lead to war?