Early-early Ethernet used connectors adapted from the RF communications industry, which are not designed for many frequent insert/removal cycles. Ethernet then moved to that form factor to the more rugged and proven phone RJ-45 connector type.
RJ-45 was and is a carryover from the telephone industry, where it was used in hundreds of millions of wall outlets and phones. Any failures in it are from individual cases of poor quality manufacturing, not from fundamental design flaws.
From that, we moved to the USB technology which can handle higher data rates. The original USB form factor physical pin design was relatively rugged (but the data rates were not too high yet.) The horrible multitude of ensuing physical variants designs was poorly implemented.
USB-C is an evolution away from the hodgepodge but possibly not as durable.
Micro-B seemed worse than USB-C, Micro B was orientation dependent, constantly breaking. Have gone through more phones and chargers w/ Micro-B due to that issue.
I do have a tinfoil idea that regular USB was orientation dependent so we are reminded of duality constantly. I don't know if that's really true but wonder about it, haha.
The U in USB stands for Universal. They made a half dozen incompatible types, so the U should be dropped from the name.
SB-c cables. Serial Bus, yes. Universal, no.
As we used to say
It's not Universal, it's not Serial and it's not a Bus .
The history on this is:
Early-early Ethernet used connectors adapted from the RF communications industry, which are not designed for many frequent insert/removal cycles. Ethernet then moved to that form factor to the more rugged and proven phone RJ-45 connector type.
RJ-45 was and is a carryover from the telephone industry, where it was used in hundreds of millions of wall outlets and phones. Any failures in it are from individual cases of poor quality manufacturing, not from fundamental design flaws.
From that, we moved to the USB technology which can handle higher data rates. The original USB form factor physical pin design was relatively rugged (but the data rates were not too high yet.) The horrible multitude of ensuing physical variants designs was poorly implemented.
USB-C is an evolution away from the hodgepodge but possibly not as durable.
And especially for mechanical keyboards and the like. Should go USB Type B, but manufactures are using type C's on them. Clearly manufactured to fail.
I have no clue why rj-45 is being compared with a USB. What's shitty about usb-c? I've only used it as a charging cord
Micro-B seemed worse than USB-C, Micro B was orientation dependent, constantly breaking. Have gone through more phones and chargers w/ Micro-B due to that issue.
I do have a tinfoil idea that regular USB was orientation dependent so we are reminded of duality constantly. I don't know if that's really true but wonder about it, haha.
Most plugs only go in one way dude