In Russia 1917, there are MORE people fighting the Bolsheviks than there are Bolsheviks.
They all rolled over and died in front of Stalin.
Meanwhile murderous beasts in the like of Stalin and Lenin are regarded as heroes in Russia and in the American far-left, while the "heroes" who fought Stalin and Lenin?
Statistics. One in a billion, nameless bodies. No longer human, but a soulless body.
We're facing the same thing right now.
There are more people opposing LGBTQP++++ ideologies than there are supporters.
There are more people who oppose the never ending covid world than those who support it (in the US at least).
There are more people who believe that the USA is being occupied by terrorists than those who don't.
But guess what.
It doesn't matter if we lose. If the new revolutionary government takes over America and declares "Final Solution" against "reactionary elements", you WILL roll over and die.
They don't care if you're transgender, christian or patriot. YOU WILL ROLL OVER AND DIE. Full stop.
It can all be stopped when the US people start rejecting fiat money, as in only 10% of people use the dollar or other central bank currencies. (This includes crypto) They should had been used gold and silver tokens or threads.
It can all be stopped when so-called "truthers" stopped trusting politicians.
Otherwise, we will all fall into the same fate like the Russians.
Trusting in politicians to lead them, bravely fighting against the Communist enemy, then rolling over and dying, becoming one of the numbers.
When people call me a "conspiracy theorist".
I like to tell them I am a "Alternative History's and Religions" enthusiast.
I learned in highschool history and even took some college classes (that were easy A's) but I legit found fascinating with the same title.
There are always two sides to one story. To really have a better understanding of human nature and what happened you need to know both sides.
Seems people have become so dumbed down that they cant appreciate any other opinion but the one that comes from them or aka the tv.
Also turns out that because human experience is such a subjective thing (do you suppose all or most living things have this subjective awareness of what is happening around them?) that there are many different cultures, many different beliefs.
I must have spent to much time listening to people like carl sagan and buckminster fuller. My dad was a huge reason I knew who these people were.
What I seek is a system that can unify all these beliefs and facts.
Perhaps this is one of the biggest reasons I want to believe we were created by a higher power, a Abrahamic god, or even a traveler from another star system. I suppose if I had never seen ufo's (objects that are stationary then go mach 20+ in the blink of an eye.) I wouldnt believe the latter either I guess.
The many are fighting among themselves (reasoning) when consenting to want vs not want the suggestions (Bolshevism) of the few.
Which suggested idol destroyed more lives...Stalin; Lenin or pornstars? The genocide is a mere mouse-click away and it's consensual.
What if it's the names and the counting that is being suggested by the few to tempt each ONE of the many to ignore being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable)?
Nature doesn't brand anything; nor does it count anything. It simply moves forward; while suggested brands and counting tempt one to want to hold onto the motion instead of being the resistance (living) within motion (dying).
Has any death you've ever perceived brought living to a "full stop" or did the loss tempted you to ignore the coexisting growth? Growing within loss represents the status quo of life.
Opposing implies by choice (not want); which puts one into opposition with others (want). Both sides within conflict (want vs not want imbalance) ignore being choice within need/want balance.
Put some color in your hair and a dildo in your pocket and get out there...does it feel like winning to be on the other side of the conflict? Why do both sides consent to the suggested "LGBTQP++++" and who's suggesting it?
One doesn't need to reject suggested values; one needs to resist the temptation of suggestion over perception. Only then can one comprehend being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
Don't wanting what others suggest doesn't help one growing within what's needed. Fiction (suggested money) can only be devaluated by adaptation to reality (perceivable value); not be opposing fiction. If money has no value then one is fighting to destroy "nothing" of value...that mental state of ignorance keeping one engaged in physical conflicts is what's being ruthlessly exploited by the parasitic few, who suggest the ignorant many what to fight each other over.
You are not part of the many...one represents a partial (perceiving) of the whole (perceivable).
To be implies ONE (perceiving) of ONEness (perceivable). Suggested collectivism tempts one to ignore this for being "one of the many".
Sleight of hand: "Gooble Gobble...One of Us...We Accept Her". That's what the FREAKS do aka FREAK, verb (Hebrew; to divide.] - "change of place; turn of mind".
Hahaha.
Nobody is gonna stop using money. Until money stops using money. It simply exchanges into whatever current money there is.
History is in the eye of the beholder until they don't even teach it anymore. If they did there probably wouldn't be so many autistics, and they demand to be inserted into everybody else's history, by declaring it was something else, and changing it. Until what is taught is geography and all it teaches is climate change, and it occurs when you change climates, and because they did, they also become feckless, some other opposing genders.
No, but seriously? Hahaha
Inception towards death represents the only current for those living within. Suggested currency tempts one to ignore perceivable current (dying) and the need to be the resistance (living) within it.
...who consents to view his-story through the lens of the few suggesting it. Notice that the main re-actor within your story (generation) is missing within his-story...what's the implication for one to ignore reacting (living) to generation (process of dying)?
The few tempt the many to want to be the hero of his-story; which tempts each one to ignore being the center (perceiving choice) of the never ending story (perceivable balance).