According to Big Bang theory, the most distant galaxies in the JWST images are seen as they were only 400-500 million years after the origin of the universe. Yet already some of the galaxies have shown stellar populations that are over a billion years old. Since nothing could have originated before the Big Bang, the existence of these galaxies demonstrates that the Big Bang did not occur.>
"According to Big Bang theory, the most distant galaxies in the (Webb Telescope) images are seen as they were only 400-500 million years after the origin of the universe. Yet already some of the galaxies have shown stellar populations that are over a billion years old. Since nothing could have originated before the Big Bang, the existence of these galaxies demonstrates that the Big Bang did not occur."
snip
Alison Kirkpatrick, an astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, is quoted as saying, “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning and wondering if everything I’ve done is wrong.”
Yep. They also don't know what electricity is, nor admit to the existence of cosmic ether. If light is a wave, it MUST move through a medium. It can travel through glass, water and air, so MATTER is NOT that medium.
Well, that was sorta my point in making the thread. That many people have replaced a religion with science, and suddenly a core doctrine of the faith is now being questioned and shown as false. It's keeping one woman up at night, her faith is shaken.
So, yea, science is JUST a method of knowledge acquisition.
The picture was phony. It had to be since the whole JWST is phony. So what are they going to do now that they've stepped in it?
They'll let it burn itself out for a while, and clamp down on anyone talking about it excessively if need be. In the meantime they'll come up with a more "scientific" phony picture. When they release it, everyone will look at it and say, "Oh, see, it's just like we thought. No problem at all!"
No astronomer, cosmologist, or other "scientist" will decline to accept money over this issue.
There a several things, but here are two big ones.
I smelled a big space rat last December. Did you know that no one was present at the launch? It was transported and launched in secret. Why, you ask? Because they were scared of pirates stealing it: Watch NASA's James Webb Space Telescope launch into orbit. Like it might end up on eBay or something.
The title is present tense, but note that this report is after the "launch" and AFAIK it was not broadcast live.
Who wins with this remaining the main theory. there have been multiple theories since I was a kid
Look for what is the Ein Sof.
electric universe
BB theory should've been gone once they took pics of QUasars connected to galaxies with different red shifts.
BB theory was a religion.
Big bang = Ein Sof = ratcrap
Thank you for this.
From the article:
"According to Big Bang theory, the most distant galaxies in the (Webb Telescope) images are seen as they were only 400-500 million years after the origin of the universe. Yet already some of the galaxies have shown stellar populations that are over a billion years old. Since nothing could have originated before the Big Bang, the existence of these galaxies demonstrates that the Big Bang did not occur."
snip
Alison Kirkpatrick, an astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, is quoted as saying, “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning and wondering if everything I’ve done is wrong.”
Yep. They also don't know what electricity is, nor admit to the existence of cosmic ether. If light is a wave, it MUST move through a medium. It can travel through glass, water and air, so MATTER is NOT that medium.
Actually, light is not the only thing that acts like a wave AND a particle.
I read a book from the library recently that stated scientists have demonstrated that electrons also act like waves AND particles.
Seems there's a lot more than meets the eye.
Upon further digging, you may also find that ‘electrons’ do not exist at all and shiuld equally to be labeled a “theory” as is the big bang nonsense
Well, that was sorta my point in making the thread. That many people have replaced a religion with science, and suddenly a core doctrine of the faith is now being questioned and shown as false. It's keeping one woman up at night, her faith is shaken.
So, yea, science is JUST a method of knowledge acquisition.
The picture was phony. It had to be since the whole JWST is phony. So what are they going to do now that they've stepped in it?
They'll let it burn itself out for a while, and clamp down on anyone talking about it excessively if need be. In the meantime they'll come up with a more "scientific" phony picture. When they release it, everyone will look at it and say, "Oh, see, it's just like we thought. No problem at all!"
No astronomer, cosmologist, or other "scientist" will decline to accept money over this issue.
What?
Phony picture in place of what?
What truth do you think they are trying to cover up or ignore?
It's just another fake space mission is all I know. Relax. You're free to believe whatever you like.
Why do you think it's fake?
There a several things, but here are two big ones.
I smelled a big space rat last December. Did you know that no one was present at the launch? It was transported and launched in secret. Why, you ask? Because they were scared of pirates stealing it: Watch NASA's James Webb Space Telescope launch into orbit. Like it might end up on eBay or something.
The title is present tense, but note that this report is after the "launch" and AFAIK it was not broadcast live.
Then they sealed it with this unrecoverable "science" boo-boo: Jim Stone: Webb of Lies.
The latest gaffe and subject of the OP comes as no surprise.
Jim Stone's article is debunked here:
Why Webb stars have eight points
Yeah, it looks like they calculated that diffraction pattern back in 2007 (page 23): The JWST Point Spread Function: Calculation Methods and Expected Properties (41-page PDF). Thanks for the heads up.
So add this oddity to the pile: Weird inconsistencies with the James Webb press conference (or lack thereof) today. Let's get everybody together for a 5 minute press conference, then talk amongst ourselves in secret? Not proof it's fake, but if it isn't, why do they have to act so weird when suspicion is already in the air?