Not sure what you mean. If you're saying preventing migration would protect our children then I agree. If you watched the video the worker says they're "supposed to" only release the unaccompanied minors to direct family. Thing is, all the kids have to say is theyre related and MVM would approve them. The worker talks about children obviously unrelated going to the same person, stories about children meeting people through Facebook. Really creepy stuff.
Every suggested story about migration tempts the listeners to consent to migration by either wanting or not wanting any of the presented aspects of it. The resulting conflicts of reason (want vs not want) among the many is what sustains the migration racket of the suggesting few.
The issue isn't migration into nations and all the horror associated with it; but that the many ignore that nation represents "a people"; not the suggested brand "enter nation here". The United Nations of the few can only exist because the many consenting to allow the few to define; redefine and contradict what nation means; while the many ignore being a nation; a people.
No nation is controlled by its people; but by consented to representatives. Ones choice cannot be represented by others...only ignored.
Those who want to protect migrant children fuel migration. Protecting ones own children would prevent migration and miscegenation.
Not sure what you mean. If you're saying preventing migration would protect our children then I agree. If you watched the video the worker says they're "supposed to" only release the unaccompanied minors to direct family. Thing is, all the kids have to say is theyre related and MVM would approve them. The worker talks about children obviously unrelated going to the same person, stories about children meeting people through Facebook. Really creepy stuff.
Every suggested story about migration tempts the listeners to consent to migration by either wanting or not wanting any of the presented aspects of it. The resulting conflicts of reason (want vs not want) among the many is what sustains the migration racket of the suggesting few.
The issue isn't migration into nations and all the horror associated with it; but that the many ignore that nation represents "a people"; not the suggested brand "enter nation here". The United Nations of the few can only exist because the many consenting to allow the few to define; redefine and contradict what nation means; while the many ignore being a nation; a people.
No nation is controlled by its people; but by consented to representatives. Ones choice cannot be represented by others...only ignored.