Every suggested story about migration tempts the listeners to consent to migration by either wanting or not wanting any of the presented aspects of it. The resulting conflicts of reason (want vs not want) among the many is what sustains the migration racket of the suggesting few.

The issue isn't migration into nations and all the horror associated with it; but that the many ignore that nation represents "a people"; not the suggested brand "enter nation here". The United Nations of the few can only exist because the many consenting to allow the few to define; redefine and contradict what nation means; while the many ignore being a nation; a people.

No nation is controlled by its people; but by consented to representatives. Ones choice cannot be represented by others...only ignored.