a) many implies being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)
b) reality isn't for many of us; but for (wards) each one. The ongoing process of dying establishes each temporary life within.
c) ones consent to suggested SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin societas, from socius, a companion] - "the union of a number of rational beings" is what tempts one to believe to belong to other ones; to exist under the umbrella of collectivism; to be followers of leadership; to be part of communities; congregations; clubs; cults; cities; civilizations; chain of commands etc.
All of these umbrellas demand ones free will of choice to enter by consent; while underneath all individual choices are suppressed by the few who direct the many in the name of the consented to umbrella.
to "repair the world" means to them
a) REPA'IR, verb transitive [Latin reparo] - "to restore to a sound state after decay, injury, dilapidation or partial destruction". What if sound represents the origin for every work uttered within? What is perceivable sound doesn't require repair; but those within sound represent the choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want) in reaction to enacting sound?
b) RE (response to) PARO (prepare)...that implies adaptation (living) to origin (process of dying).
c) any contemplation about differences within suggested meaning ignores that the origin of all perceivable differences (living) implies sameness (dying). It's the many who are being domesticated to consent to suggestions by the few as being able to define meaning; which in return allows the few to redefine and contradict it at will.
The few cannot invert perceivable reality; only suggested fiction within the minds (memory) of those consenting to uphold it can be shaped through suggestion.
d) them implies your perspective through the lens of reasoning aka us vs them (a rebranding of want vs not want). Perceiving within perceivable represents being one within oneness aka partial within whole; choice within balance; living within the process of dying.
to eliminate "Amalek"
a) ELIM'INATE, verb -"to expel; drive by force; to thrust out"...that represents the status quo of living within the process of dying. Temporary resistance (life) is being driven by the force of ongoing velocity (inception towards death).
b) to destroy "amalek" requires consent to the suggested word "amalek"; which then allows those suggesting it to tempt those consenting to it to follow directions towards death. Nature doesn't brand anything; no brands are perceivable; yet consenting to suggested brands tempts one to ignore the perceivable natural order...being moved from inception towards death; which demands resistance from those living within.
Perceivable sound requires resonance, suggested words tempt dissonance through ignorance of resonance. The few tempt the many to brand (idolize) a moving system as to tempt the ignorance of perceivable moving differences (inspiration for adaptation).
their religious texts
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"; which represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. Choice can only exist at the center of balance; while balance can only exist at the center (momentum) of motion. All imbalance exist within balance by the choice to ignore perceivable balance for suggested choices.
Living within the process of dying represents being response-ability within temptation. The original bond represents perceivable balance towards perceiving choice.
The few suggest contract laws to bind the will of the many consensual to their own. That represents the foundation for every religion; every group; every umbrella; every -ism.
the cause for all evil.
Comprehending the cause requires growth of self discernment of being the effect (living) within the cause (process of dying) aka the reaction (choice) within an enacting system (balance) aka choice within a need (perceivable) + want (suggested) balance.
Consenting to suggested want over perceivable need causes the want versus not want conflict of reason; which those making the suggestions can then rebrand into good vs evil; true vs false; believing vs not believing; coffee vs tea; Russia vs Ukraine; straight vs gay; edomite vs amalek etc.
The Talmud says...
TALMUD; noun - "instruction" aka IN (within) STRUO (to furnish) -TION (through action)...that implies being the reaction within enacting; while furnished with any thing wanted or necessary; hence being choice within need/want balance.
The structure of the Talmud aka Mishnah and Gemara represent allegory for the perceivable whole; and the suggestions of the perceiving partial within.
What you consented to be offended by (once Whites are exterminated, snakes will even cease to bite humans) represents suggestions made within the Gemara.
Look at the behavior of the many around you...fuck the democrats; fuck biden; fuck the republicans; fuck trump; fuck the UN; fuck the WEF; fuck Gates; fuck McDonalds; fuck Muslims; fuck Christians; fuck the oil prices; fuck society; fuck them; fuck jews; fuck the khazarian mafia; fuck ignorance; fuck laziness; fuck others; fuck yourself; fuck you motherfucker; fuck microsoft; fuck videogames; fuck movies; fuck netflix; fuck politics; fuck taxes; fuck banking; fuck the economy; fuck religion; fuck nature; fuck responsibility; fuck everything...
That represents babylon aka babbling on aka endless suggested fiction; endless information to reason about; endless conflicts; endless judgments made; endless shirking of response-ability onto others; endless suggestion of meaning; yet it's all temporary growth of disorder; which eventually will collapse upon itself (tower of babel) and yet what remains represents the perceivable foundation (sound) of all the suggestions (words) within.
Suggestion represents a state of mind which willingly ignores the perceivable origin. The Mishnah/Gemara structure mimics that to utilize talmudic reasoning as a tool to domesticate those stuck within Gemara. The only means out of suggested information (want) represents ones choice to adapt to perceivable inspiration (need) and that represents the response-ability of each one for the sustenance of oneself.
It's extremely depressing to see no way out of this.
a) impression (perceivable) towards compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss). If one chooses repression (self restraint by submission to the suggestions of others); then one is being tempted into a conflict (reason) with others; hence both depressing each other.
Those who ignore being resistance (living) within velocity (dying) are tempted to aim resistance against resistance; hence forcing inwards (depression) instead of expressing growth outwards.
b) "no way" ignores that everything perceivable (ongoing flow of inspiration) is caused by the only way aka by the process of dying aka the natural order moving those living within from inception towards death.
It's your choice to view the process of dying as the loss towards death (temptation) or the opportunity to grow life (struggle). The inspiration required for struggling represents the perceivable inspiration the many ignore for suggested information by the few...suggestions tempting the many to go with the flow; to seek outcomes; to consent to progressivism etc. "play the game; get those achievements; kid and if it's game over; then just start again"
c) EXTRE'ME, adjective [Latin extremus, last.] - "outermost". As free will of choice at the center of a balance based system you represent the innermost; the reaction at the core of everything enacted upon you aka perception at the center of everything perceivable.
The parasitic few advertised "extreme" to you, and you consented to their suggestion, hence fearing outcomes of not being able to escape. That represents fiction; reality represents the origin at the other side; the ones you're being tempted to not look at.
it's extremely hopeful to know
a) hope; once again tempts you to aim towards the outermost; while ignoring being the innermost.
b) hope vs fear represents the rebrand of wanting vs not wanting the suggestions of others; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable origin. Let's rebrand again...to fear "democrats" while putting hope in "republicans" or vice versa...both consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
c) to know represents KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"; while hope implies versus fear aka a conflict about suggested information; while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
The parasitic few slap the word "knowledge" upon suggested information; hence tempting you to believe that hope towards outcome (extreme) represents knowledge (adaptation to origin), yet those with eyes to see notice the contradiction.
no fear in death
a) in death implies living within the process of dying; hence being temporary growth within ongoing loss.
b) "no" aka not; nothing; nothingness represents the suggested inversion of perceivable everything, and you using it implies your consent to ignore everything perceivable (reality) for suggested nothingness (fiction).
Allow yourself to write down your comprehension about the origin of "nothing" and how nothing could be perceivable? Whenever the many use "no" they confirm their domestication to the will of the suggesting few.
c) fear implies towards outcome; hence death. Life implies in reaction to enacting origin; hence for the sustenance of self...while being moved towards predefined outcome.
a) many implies being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)
b) reality isn't for many of us; but for (wards) each one. The ongoing process of dying establishes each temporary life within.
c) ones consent to suggested SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin societas, from socius, a companion] - "the union of a number of rational beings" is what tempts one to believe to belong to other ones; to exist under the umbrella of collectivism; to be followers of leadership; to be part of communities; congregations; clubs; cults; cities; civilizations; chain of commands etc.
All of these umbrellas demand ones free will of choice to enter by consent; while underneath all individual choices are suppressed by the few who direct the many in the name of the consented to umbrella.
a) REPA'IR, verb transitive [Latin reparo] - "to restore to a sound state after decay, injury, dilapidation or partial destruction". What if sound represents the origin for every work uttered within? What is perceivable sound doesn't require repair; but those within sound represent the choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want) in reaction to enacting sound?
b) RE (response to) PARO (prepare)...that implies adaptation (living) to origin (process of dying).
c) any contemplation about differences within suggested meaning ignores that the origin of all perceivable differences (living) implies sameness (dying). It's the many who are being domesticated to consent to suggestions by the few as being able to define meaning; which in return allows the few to redefine and contradict it at will.
The few cannot invert perceivable reality; only suggested fiction within the minds (memory) of those consenting to uphold it can be shaped through suggestion.
d) them implies your perspective through the lens of reasoning aka us vs them (a rebranding of want vs not want). Perceiving within perceivable represents being one within oneness aka partial within whole; choice within balance; living within the process of dying.
a) ELIM'INATE, verb -"to expel; drive by force; to thrust out"...that represents the status quo of living within the process of dying. Temporary resistance (life) is being driven by the force of ongoing velocity (inception towards death).
b) to destroy "amalek" requires consent to the suggested word "amalek"; which then allows those suggesting it to tempt those consenting to it to follow directions towards death. Nature doesn't brand anything; no brands are perceivable; yet consenting to suggested brands tempts one to ignore the perceivable natural order...being moved from inception towards death; which demands resistance from those living within.
Perceivable sound requires resonance, suggested words tempt dissonance through ignorance of resonance. The few tempt the many to brand (idolize) a moving system as to tempt the ignorance of perceivable moving differences (inspiration for adaptation).
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"; which represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. Choice can only exist at the center of balance; while balance can only exist at the center (momentum) of motion. All imbalance exist within balance by the choice to ignore perceivable balance for suggested choices.
Living within the process of dying represents being response-ability within temptation. The original bond represents perceivable balance towards perceiving choice.
The few suggest contract laws to bind the will of the many consensual to their own. That represents the foundation for every religion; every group; every umbrella; every -ism.
Comprehending the cause requires growth of self discernment of being the effect (living) within the cause (process of dying) aka the reaction (choice) within an enacting system (balance) aka choice within a need (perceivable) + want (suggested) balance.
Consenting to suggested want over perceivable need causes the want versus not want conflict of reason; which those making the suggestions can then rebrand into good vs evil; true vs false; believing vs not believing; coffee vs tea; Russia vs Ukraine; straight vs gay; edomite vs amalek etc.
TALMUD; noun - "instruction" aka IN (within) STRUO (to furnish) -TION (through action)...that implies being the reaction within enacting; while furnished with any thing wanted or necessary; hence being choice within need/want balance.
The structure of the Talmud aka Mishnah and Gemara represent allegory for the perceivable whole; and the suggestions of the perceiving partial within.
What you consented to be offended by (once Whites are exterminated, snakes will even cease to bite humans) represents suggestions made within the Gemara.
Look at the behavior of the many around you...fuck the democrats; fuck biden; fuck the republicans; fuck trump; fuck the UN; fuck the WEF; fuck Gates; fuck McDonalds; fuck Muslims; fuck Christians; fuck the oil prices; fuck society; fuck them; fuck jews; fuck the khazarian mafia; fuck ignorance; fuck laziness; fuck others; fuck yourself; fuck you motherfucker; fuck microsoft; fuck videogames; fuck movies; fuck netflix; fuck politics; fuck taxes; fuck banking; fuck the economy; fuck religion; fuck nature; fuck responsibility; fuck everything...
That represents babylon aka babbling on aka endless suggested fiction; endless information to reason about; endless conflicts; endless judgments made; endless shirking of response-ability onto others; endless suggestion of meaning; yet it's all temporary growth of disorder; which eventually will collapse upon itself (tower of babel) and yet what remains represents the perceivable foundation (sound) of all the suggestions (words) within.
Suggestion represents a state of mind which willingly ignores the perceivable origin. The Mishnah/Gemara structure mimics that to utilize talmudic reasoning as a tool to domesticate those stuck within Gemara. The only means out of suggested information (want) represents ones choice to adapt to perceivable inspiration (need) and that represents the response-ability of each one for the sustenance of oneself.
a) impression (perceivable) towards compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss). If one chooses repression (self restraint by submission to the suggestions of others); then one is being tempted into a conflict (reason) with others; hence both depressing each other.
Those who ignore being resistance (living) within velocity (dying) are tempted to aim resistance against resistance; hence forcing inwards (depression) instead of expressing growth outwards.
b) "no way" ignores that everything perceivable (ongoing flow of inspiration) is caused by the only way aka by the process of dying aka the natural order moving those living within from inception towards death.
It's your choice to view the process of dying as the loss towards death (temptation) or the opportunity to grow life (struggle). The inspiration required for struggling represents the perceivable inspiration the many ignore for suggested information by the few...suggestions tempting the many to go with the flow; to seek outcomes; to consent to progressivism etc. "play the game; get those achievements; kid and if it's game over; then just start again"
c) EXTRE'ME, adjective [Latin extremus, last.] - "outermost". As free will of choice at the center of a balance based system you represent the innermost; the reaction at the core of everything enacted upon you aka perception at the center of everything perceivable.
The parasitic few advertised "extreme" to you, and you consented to their suggestion, hence fearing outcomes of not being able to escape. That represents fiction; reality represents the origin at the other side; the ones you're being tempted to not look at.
a) hope; once again tempts you to aim towards the outermost; while ignoring being the innermost.
b) hope vs fear represents the rebrand of wanting vs not wanting the suggestions of others; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable origin. Let's rebrand again...to fear "democrats" while putting hope in "republicans" or vice versa...both consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
c) to know represents KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"; while hope implies versus fear aka a conflict about suggested information; while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
The parasitic few slap the word "knowledge" upon suggested information; hence tempting you to believe that hope towards outcome (extreme) represents knowledge (adaptation to origin), yet those with eyes to see notice the contradiction.
a) in death implies living within the process of dying; hence being temporary growth within ongoing loss.
b) "no" aka not; nothing; nothingness represents the suggested inversion of perceivable everything, and you using it implies your consent to ignore everything perceivable (reality) for suggested nothingness (fiction).
Allow yourself to write down your comprehension about the origin of "nothing" and how nothing could be perceivable? Whenever the many use "no" they confirm their domestication to the will of the suggesting few.
c) fear implies towards outcome; hence death. Life implies in reaction to enacting origin; hence for the sustenance of self...while being moved towards predefined outcome.