Testimonies are not evidence, is not that we don't believe some people actually saw something is that what they saw and say is a spaceship may be many other things, it could very well be an holographic illusion. Steven Greer runs a cult and it is obviously a disinformation agent, but it doesn't surprise me one bit you FOLLOW him, because that is what cattle does, they FOLLOW, and if you are not following an ideology, you are following a religion, a cult, a sect, a youtuber, a streamer or something, but cattle does what is made for: FOLLOW WITHOUT QUESTION.
That is a form of an adpopullum fallacy, facts and objecive reality is not a democracy, when you want someone to believe in something you are going to need more than just saying there is tons of people saying this or that, you need evidence of those claims, massive amounts of people could be saying whatever and that doesn't make it true.
No I’d rather tell you to go fuck yourself. Just because you’re unwilling to use common sense doesn’t mean that everyone else is going to do the same thing dip shit. Using fancy words doesn’t make you right.
If I’m sitting in the office and 10 people come in and tell me that it’s raining outside more often than that I’m going to believe them. I’m not gonna check the app on my phone and see if it indicates rain or not. I’m going to assume that most people are telling me the truth most of the time. You see unlike you most of the time I can look someone in the eye and tell if they’re lying to me or not.
By the way, the thousands of anecdotes that come out each and every year about Bigfoot also prove that Bigfoot exists. Just because most serious faggot academics avoid the topic does not mean it’s fiction.
By the way, actual genetic analysis has been done on Sasquatch hair and blood and some very interesting results have come out about. But you never heard of that right it’s because you’re fucking uninformed. Just because you, the mass media, the government and all other so-called serious academics blatantly ignore this evidence doesn’t mean that the evidence doesn’t exist.
The evidence exists for UFOs and Sasquatch exists and fuck people like you for ignoring it. The evidence that Democrats stole the 2020 election from Trump also exists. That evidence is treated the same way that evidence for UFOs in Sasquatch are treated. It’s ignored and people pretend it doesn’t exist.
So here is a final fuck you , if you don’t believe that the election was stolen from Trump.
You are a mess. Once again ad popullum fallacies, false equivalencies, now equating aliens and bigfoot to rainy days. Clearly you are frustrated and if you read yourself man Its just funny as fuck, dude you start ranting about aliens and end up with "So here is a final fuck you , if you don’t believe that the election was stolen from Trump." LMAO like, it's hilarious.
OK, person who doesn’t understand the difference between authority protecting the interests of globalists and authority finally having to tell the truth.
Next year, when a brave medical researcher from Harvard comes out and explains that they are sure that ivermectin is a good medical treatment for Covid, are you going to say that you don’t trust what that brave researcher is saying?
Yes it’s true that for 30 years researchers at Harvard deemphasized the dietary harm of sugar to human health and instead told us that animal fat was the worst thing for the heart. They did that because the sugar industry paid them to do that.
But today if one of those Harvard researchers came forward and stated that sugar is a great danger to human health are you going to discount that individual scientist because they come from Harvard.
An authority fallacy is not what you think it is: "A fundamental reason why the Appeal to Authority can be a fallacy is that a proposition can be well supported only by facts and logically valid inferences. But by using an authority, the argument is relying upon testimony, not facts. A testimony is not an argument and it is not a fact." I only care about tangible facts not opinions, testimomies or what a supposed authority thinks, you are also using a false equivalence fallacy by putting believing in Aliens on the same level as believing sugar is bad for the body or believing ivermectin is good (couldn't care less) those three are not remotely close to be on the same level.
Testimonies are not evidence, is not that we don't believe some people actually saw something is that what they saw and say is a spaceship may be many other things, it could very well be an holographic illusion. Steven Greer runs a cult and it is obviously a disinformation agent, but it doesn't surprise me one bit you FOLLOW him, because that is what cattle does, they FOLLOW, and if you are not following an ideology, you are following a religion, a cult, a sect, a youtuber, a streamer or something, but cattle does what is made for: FOLLOW WITHOUT QUESTION.
There’s a difference between one anecdote from one individual and 10,000 anecdotes a year from 10,000 different people.
If you don’t know that difference, you’re retarded.
That is a form of an adpopullum fallacy, facts and objecive reality is not a democracy, when you want someone to believe in something you are going to need more than just saying there is tons of people saying this or that, you need evidence of those claims, massive amounts of people could be saying whatever and that doesn't make it true.
No I’d rather tell you to go fuck yourself. Just because you’re unwilling to use common sense doesn’t mean that everyone else is going to do the same thing dip shit. Using fancy words doesn’t make you right.
If I’m sitting in the office and 10 people come in and tell me that it’s raining outside more often than that I’m going to believe them. I’m not gonna check the app on my phone and see if it indicates rain or not. I’m going to assume that most people are telling me the truth most of the time. You see unlike you most of the time I can look someone in the eye and tell if they’re lying to me or not.
By the way, the thousands of anecdotes that come out each and every year about Bigfoot also prove that Bigfoot exists. Just because most serious faggot academics avoid the topic does not mean it’s fiction.
By the way, actual genetic analysis has been done on Sasquatch hair and blood and some very interesting results have come out about. But you never heard of that right it’s because you’re fucking uninformed. Just because you, the mass media, the government and all other so-called serious academics blatantly ignore this evidence doesn’t mean that the evidence doesn’t exist.
The evidence exists for UFOs and Sasquatch exists and fuck people like you for ignoring it. The evidence that Democrats stole the 2020 election from Trump also exists. That evidence is treated the same way that evidence for UFOs in Sasquatch are treated. It’s ignored and people pretend it doesn’t exist.
So here is a final fuck you , if you don’t believe that the election was stolen from Trump.
You are a mess. Once again ad popullum fallacies, false equivalencies, now equating aliens and bigfoot to rainy days. Clearly you are frustrated and if you read yourself man Its just funny as fuck, dude you start ranting about aliens and end up with "So here is a final fuck you , if you don’t believe that the election was stolen from Trump." LMAO like, it's hilarious.
Nothing to say about Harvard huh…. They’re just idiots, right?
That is an authority fallacy.
OK, person who doesn’t understand the difference between authority protecting the interests of globalists and authority finally having to tell the truth.
Next year, when a brave medical researcher from Harvard comes out and explains that they are sure that ivermectin is a good medical treatment for Covid, are you going to say that you don’t trust what that brave researcher is saying?
Yes it’s true that for 30 years researchers at Harvard deemphasized the dietary harm of sugar to human health and instead told us that animal fat was the worst thing for the heart. They did that because the sugar industry paid them to do that. But today if one of those Harvard researchers came forward and stated that sugar is a great danger to human health are you going to discount that individual scientist because they come from Harvard.
An authority fallacy is not what you think it is: "A fundamental reason why the Appeal to Authority can be a fallacy is that a proposition can be well supported only by facts and logically valid inferences. But by using an authority, the argument is relying upon testimony, not facts. A testimony is not an argument and it is not a fact." I only care about tangible facts not opinions, testimomies or what a supposed authority thinks, you are also using a false equivalence fallacy by putting believing in Aliens on the same level as believing sugar is bad for the body or believing ivermectin is good (couldn't care less) those three are not remotely close to be on the same level.