An authority fallacy is not what you think it is: "A fundamental reason why the Appeal to Authority can be a fallacy is that a proposition can be well supported only by facts and logically valid inferences. But by using an authority, the argument is relying upon testimony, not facts. A testimony is not an argument and it is not a fact." I only care about tangible facts not opinions, testimomies or what a supposed authority thinks, you are also using a false equivalence fallacy by putting believing in Aliens on the same level as believing sugar is bad for the body or believing ivermectin is good (couldn't care less) those three are not remotely close to be on the same level.
Harvard along with all other employed academics ignored the UFO topic for years.
Because of this if people were asked their opinion on existence of UFOs, many people would make an appeal to authority and say , “Well if UFOs were real then Harvard and other schools would look into them, wouldn’t they?”
That appeal to authority was made on behalf of “the powers that be” who don’t want us looking into what UFOs are.
So the authorities wanted us to believe that each and every UFO sighting was explainable. They were either misidentification, lies or attempts by some individuals to attract attention or earn fraudulent income on sales of UFO books.
Now for the first time in history, Harvard, Stanford and other serious schools and academics are looking into the UFO topic. I’m pointing out the rare academics who are willing to go against the tide of your typical academic opinion on the existence of UFOs.
Notice I’m not making a claim that aliens exist. I’m simply pointing out that a few serious and brave academics are willing to actually look at this topic and take it seriously.
What I’ve done here is not make a typical claim to authority. If I were making an appeal to academia I would point out that most academics are not seriously investigating the UFO issue.
What I’m doing here is trying to describe a paradigm shift in academia.
Go fuck yourself for trying to confuse people about that.
OK, so what you’re saying is that you think Trump did lose the election.
I mean, Fox did call the election for Biden, right?
There’s no way the left could steal an election and get away with it, correct?
All the evidence that says an election was stolen from Trump doesn’t matter until the authorities tell you it matters, right?
And when they arrest Trump and CNN explains the reasons why Trump had to be arrested, you’re gonna believe that too right?
An authority fallacy is not what you think it is: "A fundamental reason why the Appeal to Authority can be a fallacy is that a proposition can be well supported only by facts and logically valid inferences. But by using an authority, the argument is relying upon testimony, not facts. A testimony is not an argument and it is not a fact." I only care about tangible facts not opinions, testimomies or what a supposed authority thinks, you are also using a false equivalence fallacy by putting believing in Aliens on the same level as believing sugar is bad for the body or believing ivermectin is good (couldn't care less) those three are not remotely close to be on the same level.
Harvard along with all other employed academics ignored the UFO topic for years.
Because of this if people were asked their opinion on existence of UFOs, many people would make an appeal to authority and say , “Well if UFOs were real then Harvard and other schools would look into them, wouldn’t they?”
That appeal to authority was made on behalf of “the powers that be” who don’t want us looking into what UFOs are.
So the authorities wanted us to believe that each and every UFO sighting was explainable. They were either misidentification, lies or attempts by some individuals to attract attention or earn fraudulent income on sales of UFO books.
Now for the first time in history, Harvard, Stanford and other serious schools and academics are looking into the UFO topic. I’m pointing out the rare academics who are willing to go against the tide of your typical academic opinion on the existence of UFOs.
Notice I’m not making a claim that aliens exist. I’m simply pointing out that a few serious and brave academics are willing to actually look at this topic and take it seriously.
What I’ve done here is not make a typical claim to authority. If I were making an appeal to academia I would point out that most academics are not seriously investigating the UFO issue.
What I’m doing here is trying to describe a paradigm shift in academia.
Go fuck yourself for trying to confuse people about that.
I will believe when clear evidence and facts are presented, not before and no matter who says it.
OK, so what you’re saying is that you think Trump did lose the election. I mean, Fox did call the election for Biden, right? There’s no way the left could steal an election and get away with it, correct? All the evidence that says an election was stolen from Trump doesn’t matter until the authorities tell you it matters, right?
And when they arrest Trump and CNN explains the reasons why Trump had to be arrested, you’re gonna believe that too right?
You’re nothing but a handshake loser…
Like I said: you are a mess. Jumping from topic to topic, moving the goalpost in a way only a mental deranged person would do.