Call him a shill or whatever, but Glen Beck was exposing the Cloward-Piven strategy way back in ancient history, oh, about 2009 or so when he had his show on Fox.
It's not just "the Democrat party". It's the entire "invisible" apparat. And people who either willingly go along with it, or are ignorant of its existence, and I don't mean that derogatorily.
One example would be Masons, who regularly show up in conspiracy forums and STILL try to coerce people looking for truth. Like check out this comment thread.
Rather quick to switch from being cloyingly nice to personal hatred. But, as been said before, they are cowards. And most are really, really bad at lying. They always have a tell.
when you don't have logic/reason on your side, use power.
To reason (want vs not want; true vs false; agreement vs disagreement; believing vs not believing etc.) implies reasoning over what others suggested; hence already giving them the power to define; redefine and contradict perceivable (need) by suggestion (want).
Choosing suggested (want or not want) over perceivable (need); causes the sides (want vs not want) aka the conflict of reason; which represents the tool of division by suggestion.
If you don't have enough power; flood the system to acquire more.
a) living within the process of dying represents being the power of reaction within the power of enacting.
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being within a system flooding those within with perceivable inspiration.
c) all perceivable is offered to each perceiving one within at any moment, so acquisition isn't needed; it represents the wanted temptation to ignore the need to grow comprehension within perceivable.
second part; two-pronged approach
All represents one in energy. All the differentiation within represents the partial ONEs within the whole ONEness of all energy. One cannot perceive a "two"; but other ones can suggest one to believe in "two".
Call him a shill or whatever, but Glen Beck was exposing the Cloward-Piven strategy way back in ancient history, oh, about 2009 or so when he had his show on Fox.
https://www.foxnews.com/story/glenn-beck-examines-1960s-radicals-richard-cloward-and-frances-fox-piven
Yeah no.
It IS the playbook since Ancient Babylonia and the Papacy.
It's not just "the Democrat party". It's the entire "invisible" apparat. And people who either willingly go along with it, or are ignorant of its existence, and I don't mean that derogatorily.
One example would be Masons, who regularly show up in conspiracy forums and STILL try to coerce people looking for truth. Like check out this comment thread.
Rather quick to switch from being cloyingly nice to personal hatred. But, as been said before, they are cowards. And most are really, really bad at lying. They always have a tell.
Zh/https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democratic-party-playbook-exposed-cloward-piven-strategy
To reason (want vs not want; true vs false; agreement vs disagreement; believing vs not believing etc.) implies reasoning over what others suggested; hence already giving them the power to define; redefine and contradict perceivable (need) by suggestion (want).
Choosing suggested (want or not want) over perceivable (need); causes the sides (want vs not want) aka the conflict of reason; which represents the tool of division by suggestion.
a) living within the process of dying represents being the power of reaction within the power of enacting.
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being within a system flooding those within with perceivable inspiration.
c) all perceivable is offered to each perceiving one within at any moment, so acquisition isn't needed; it represents the wanted temptation to ignore the need to grow comprehension within perceivable.
All represents one in energy. All the differentiation within represents the partial ONEs within the whole ONEness of all energy. One cannot perceive a "two"; but other ones can suggest one to believe in "two".