first off. every single method we use to date artifacts or bones is total guess work. Take carbon dating. Every single thing that we carbon dated during the 60, 70s and 80s is waayyyyyyyy off. All the bomb testing in the atmosphere royal fucked the base line carbon levels resulting in much old dates.
this is still a problem now because each lab has there own calibration techniques.
they even admit its off by at least 3000 years either way
the geological column is another one people like to use to date stuff. the deeper it is the older right? well not quite.
the geological column was realized in the late 1800 and the man who invented the idea was a farmer who believed that earth never ever experienced any sort of world wide natural disasters and everything must have taken millions of years to form.
each layer of ground was slowly deposited naturally over millions of millions of years is what they say. The only problem is that they have found fossils standing upright that cut right through millions of years of strata. tons of trees, animal fossils, a complete whale. all standing straight up as if they were buried suddenly in one big ass dump.
they dont talk much about this though cus it fucks the timeline into the ground. The best example of this shitshow is what happens when dino bones are carbon dated. Labs have done some carbon dating on dinos, they wont usually do it but with the right price anything goes in science
both a Trex and multiple triceratops was dated to less then 30 000 years. Dinos probably weren't what we think either. Im not saying they weren't real, some are probably faked but we did have big reptiles roaming the earth, but not like what we were told.
some had fur, some might have been warm blooded, and a lot of the smaller ones had feathers and were most likely flightless birds. like a turkey with teeth and claws.
They might have even lived along side the maga fauna and Neanderthal. carbon dating and other shit aside they have found some soft tissue from a trex. So they're not that old.
speaking of Neanderthal, ancient human is a bigger mess then dinos.
I thought that there were multiple different humans. Neanderthal, cro magnon man, denisovian, homo erectus, homo habilis ECT. Theirs 10 or so now.
anyway after comparing there actual skulls to those of a chimp or ancient chip (australopithecine) I cant help but doubt my pervious view point. All of the archaic humans are probably just chimp fossils.
the only skulls you can actually say are human are the cro magnon and Neanderthal (we can included Denisovan for now, but bare in mind they only have 1 tooth a finger bone and some bone shards, no skull has been found for them yet)
Neanderthal is often found with shitty tools and cro magnon man have more advanced tools, clothing and artifacts. One was even found with shit loads of gold and jewels (obvious ruler). Neanderthal is always found with bone wood and stone tools and often in cave deposits.
genetic testing shows that cro magnon mans DNA is the exact same as people from Sweden. light skin, blonde hair and blue eyes. Neanderthal is closest to modern Asian
it appears as far back as we go there have always been a slave class.
they developed cultures all through Europe, the middle east Asian, and the artic region.
Denisovan might have been a result of the the two classes of hominid interbreeding. from the bones we know they were much larger then both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon man and they share ancestry with the Neanderthal.
nephilim anyone?
I think alot of our mythological tales come from this time in history, the age of gods and dragons.
some massive natural disaster happen (3000BC ish), only small pockets of people living in mountains and high land survived ,everything was reset and we entered the age of kings soon after with ancient Sumer
the sphinx, Göbekli Tepe, jerico, Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum are all pre disaster builds.
Adaptation, mutation. At no fucking point do species change into something else. A mouse is still a rodent. Whether or not debatably, it hasn't been proved, becomes a supermouse, or a wombat. The observation that has occurred is adaptation where polar bears and brown bears have been known to mate. But try that with zebras, because you wanted a nice and stripy horse, what happens is you might get a mutant, but the offspring fails to birth. You can do this a million times with most different species. There are a few that crossbreed, and they're primarily domesticated animals, in the wild they generally become a parasite, causing extinction to any other relations, like killer bees, etc, or simply die off from being rejected, and failing to reproduce. Simply observed with the introduction of rabbits in Australia, it killed off causing extinction to a number of species. Invasive species cause extinction to native species. Same with humans. Island populations when discovered got sick and had no immunity. Any successful crossbreeding has had a human hand that has evolved over a much longer period of time. Dogs, cats, sheep, cows etc. At no point did they become a different animal, the dog didn't become a goat. Adaptation, yes animals are suited to their environment and often adapt into it. Temperature starts changing they shed their fur, or it even changes colour. More food, larger habitat, you can get much bigger animals. Do they become something else. Guesswork and superstition. It reminds me of the dark ages, they thought swallows lived underwater, when they migrated they went into the ocean. Same bullshit today with evolution.
Back to dinosaurs, at no fucking point. Billions of tonnes of vegetation per animal. No vegetation. Not how species coexist. They are balanced. We have all the animal species with specific roles keeping each other in check. When they don't natural extinction occurs. The only observation outside of this tends to be an Island of snakes which are all over an island of almost nothing else feeding on migrating birds. They're trapped in a habitat, they invaded, possibly introduced, or was broken off from the mainland by volcano, or whatever, but at no point have they evolved into sea snakes and swim to the mainland. You could leave them there forever. The minute they got a bright idea, a fish would eat them, because they drowned.
I am sure somebody will argue other mutations. Look at that catfish and it trying to grow some legs. No. The minute it does, there's a bigger bird. The minute the bird gets all bright, there's a lion, etc. Balanced. But what happens when they all got an asteroid? No, they didn't. But we need an origin. It needs to come up with comets mashing into each other and blackholes shitting out the monkeys. Go and fool somebody else with any poppycock. Theories of complete drivel.
Dinosaurs however aren't real. They simply didn't exist, by what has been claimed. They can't be proved. We have found what we think is animal matter and it just needs somebody mashing and splicing rocks together, and oh boy, there's your monsters. Like mythological dark age trolls. Look at the rock, and can't you see the troll. They're an invention. A profitable one. A fraudulent one. It grew so big they became a phenomenon, becoming fully inserted into dark age mythology, where like any other gargoyle, there's the harpies feeding on the gullible minds. Same bullshit in the dark ages, they put gargoyles everywhere. Previously they made up stories of hydra, griffons, chimera, manticore, dragons. Today we have dinosaurs. They aren't scientific, at all, literally a steaming pile of crap. They started as a scam that has lied repeatedly, because it profits. Until it's another dinosaurs of the week. Oh but look at the bullshitasaurs, so much fun.
So the noble Chihuahua was always such an inbred mutant, or what?
There are plenty of VIABLE hybrid species. You're full of yourself
What are you trying to say. Think don't stink. It was bred for consumption, they ate them. How did they breed a domesticated species of dog. Like any other dog. It had a human hand. Trial and error. Same with cats. Cows. Sheep. Chickens. A number of animals. A human hand over millennia, eons. Despite all their splicing it's still a dog, not a rodent. Although you could've sold it as one in the dark ages. Same as evolution today, it's not a dog, it's an evolved mouse. There's a good ratty. Your unpronounceable little mutant. Unfortunately it's not livestock anymore and other dogs get in trouble for eating the little rat. But hell.
Look at the horse and donkey. The mule is sterile. Same with a horse and zebra. OK. The point raised. Crossbreeding in the wild isn't successful. Humans cause extinction when they get all smart with it. Killer bees. Rabbits in Australia. The grey squirrel. Etc.
There are some species that do, the bear is an example and there are others. But at no fucking point did the bear become another animal, it was still a bear. Most of the time if it was a snowflake, it was rejected dying off much quicker. Or it became a parasite killing off its relations, killer bees, etc.
I don't know why you didn't understand that?
Mules aren't sterile. There's plenty of VIABLE hybrid species, humanity being one. We can look at south american howler monkeys as an example. The darker ones interbred with another species while both don't accept the hybrids, creating a "hybrid zone" between them. 3 distict species with viable offspring.
What of havelina? You know picary are genetically closer to skunks than pigs, right? You should also know humans are closer to pigs than monkeys.
Type mules sterile into Google. Dumb ass. Hahaha.
They're virtually impotent.
What are you arguing. It's like speaking to a hybrid. You clearly didn't understand the point raised. Now you're trying to convince me I didn't write adaptation. Dumbass.