first off. every single method we use to date artifacts or bones is total guess work. Take carbon dating. Every single thing that we carbon dated during the 60, 70s and 80s is waayyyyyyyy off. All the bomb testing in the atmosphere royal fucked the base line carbon levels resulting in much old dates.
this is still a problem now because each lab has there own calibration techniques.
they even admit its off by at least 3000 years either way
the geological column is another one people like to use to date stuff. the deeper it is the older right? well not quite.
the geological column was realized in the late 1800 and the man who invented the idea was a farmer who believed that earth never ever experienced any sort of world wide natural disasters and everything must have taken millions of years to form.
each layer of ground was slowly deposited naturally over millions of millions of years is what they say. The only problem is that they have found fossils standing upright that cut right through millions of years of strata. tons of trees, animal fossils, a complete whale. all standing straight up as if they were buried suddenly in one big ass dump.
they dont talk much about this though cus it fucks the timeline into the ground. The best example of this shitshow is what happens when dino bones are carbon dated. Labs have done some carbon dating on dinos, they wont usually do it but with the right price anything goes in science
both a Trex and multiple triceratops was dated to less then 30 000 years. Dinos probably weren't what we think either. Im not saying they weren't real, some are probably faked but we did have big reptiles roaming the earth, but not like what we were told.
some had fur, some might have been warm blooded, and a lot of the smaller ones had feathers and were most likely flightless birds. like a turkey with teeth and claws.
They might have even lived along side the maga fauna and Neanderthal. carbon dating and other shit aside they have found some soft tissue from a trex. So they're not that old.
speaking of Neanderthal, ancient human is a bigger mess then dinos.
I thought that there were multiple different humans. Neanderthal, cro magnon man, denisovian, homo erectus, homo habilis ECT. Theirs 10 or so now.
anyway after comparing there actual skulls to those of a chimp or ancient chip (australopithecine) I cant help but doubt my pervious view point. All of the archaic humans are probably just chimp fossils.
the only skulls you can actually say are human are the cro magnon and Neanderthal (we can included Denisovan for now, but bare in mind they only have 1 tooth a finger bone and some bone shards, no skull has been found for them yet)
Neanderthal is often found with shitty tools and cro magnon man have more advanced tools, clothing and artifacts. One was even found with shit loads of gold and jewels (obvious ruler). Neanderthal is always found with bone wood and stone tools and often in cave deposits.
genetic testing shows that cro magnon mans DNA is the exact same as people from Sweden. light skin, blonde hair and blue eyes. Neanderthal is closest to modern Asian
it appears as far back as we go there have always been a slave class.
they developed cultures all through Europe, the middle east Asian, and the artic region.
Denisovan might have been a result of the the two classes of hominid interbreeding. from the bones we know they were much larger then both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon man and they share ancestry with the Neanderthal.
nephilim anyone?
I think alot of our mythological tales come from this time in history, the age of gods and dragons.
some massive natural disaster happen (3000BC ish), only small pockets of people living in mountains and high land survived ,everything was reset and we entered the age of kings soon after with ancient Sumer
the sphinx, Göbekli Tepe, jerico, Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum are all pre disaster builds.
What are you trying to say. Think don't stink. It was bred for consumption, they ate them. How did they breed a domesticated species of dog. Like any other dog. It had a human hand. Trial and error. Same with cats. Cows. Sheep. Chickens. A number of animals. A human hand over millennia, eons. Despite all their splicing it's still a dog, not a rodent. Although you could've sold it as one in the dark ages. Same as evolution today, it's not a dog, it's an evolved mouse. There's a good ratty. Your unpronounceable little mutant. Unfortunately it's not livestock anymore and other dogs get in trouble for eating the little rat. But hell.
Look at the horse and donkey. The mule is sterile. Same with a horse and zebra. OK. The point raised. Crossbreeding in the wild isn't successful. Humans cause extinction when they get all smart with it. Killer bees. Rabbits in Australia. The grey squirrel. Etc.
There are some species that do, the bear is an example and there are others. But at no fucking point did the bear become another animal, it was still a bear. Most of the time if it was a snowflake, it was rejected dying off much quicker. Or it became a parasite killing off its relations, killer bees, etc.
I don't know why you didn't understand that?
Mules aren't sterile. There's plenty of VIABLE hybrid species, humanity being one. We can look at south american howler monkeys as an example. The darker ones interbred with another species while both don't accept the hybrids, creating a "hybrid zone" between them. 3 distict species with viable offspring.
What of havelina? You know picary are genetically closer to skunks than pigs, right? You should also know humans are closer to pigs than monkeys.
Type mules sterile into Google. Dumb ass. Hahaha.
They're virtually impotent.
What are you arguing. It's like speaking to a hybrid. You clearly didn't understand the point raised. Now you're trying to convince me I didn't write adaptation. Dumbass.
"Most documented cases of mules/hinnies being fertile have been in the female mule (molly/mare mule). A majority of male mules/hinnies are castrated, but one case of a fertile hinny producing live, mature spermatozoa was documented at Texas A&M in the 1950s. Also, mare mules have been used successfully as recipients. Colorado State University several years ago was successful in doing so. Also, keep in mind it’s likely that more mules may be fertile, but we commonly do not attempt to breed mules. Mules and hinnies that have foaled in the past were bred to jacks (male donkeys)."
https://horses.extension.org/is-there-a-chance-that-a-mule-may-reproduce-if-bred/
Man made splicing. The males are all but castrated, and they get a donkey to cover for it. Heehaw.
Seriously man-made like almost every other hybrid, or invasive introduction, with much rarer exceptions. These either go rogue ending and extincting their relations, or die off much quicker from being snowflakes.
Yes domestication works it has been at it for millennia. But at what point has it turned a pig into a monkey? They did this and the pigmonkey died very quickly. Now they're injecting the monkeys with human DNA to make them smarter. And the last person to get the fullblooded stemcell pig heart died of it, painfully.
Are we arguing adaption doesn't work? Or that adaption hasn't created the Jannies? Impotent mules. But they could birth, if they just got a pig heart? No, what? The hybrids are evolutionary? Where have they changed species, where is my goatdog. It barks, it charges, and it eats the rats. I want a goatdog, it also makes cheese. Where is this? Convince, all that splicing, all that crossbreeding and there ain't no goatdog. Nope. It hasn't had millions of years to make the chickens. Umm they're finding monkeyman flints and tools from 2.5 million years ago. But of course they didn't have chickens in the dark ages? But they had the sheep. At what point did the sheep become a horse. They tried this riding a sheep. But it wasn't a horse.