It seems as if the end goal is to confine us all to smaller territory to preserve the outside world around us. History repeats itself. Has this happened before? According to our globe we have one entire blank side of our globe nothing but ocean. How illogical would it be to think that there is forgotten or protected lands on this world much like Antarctica.
I’m just speculating the cycles of control and how we might not have seen the whole hand being played due to the fact the human lifespan is incredibly limited.
Because motion represents direction (inception towards death) for those within (life).
Reality represents the need to adapt to perceivable (inspiration); while resisting the temptation to reason (true vs false) about suggested (information). Those within reality cannot define it; cause they represents the reaction to an enacting; predefined reality. A moving system doesn't communicate true or false states to those within; only inspiration (moving differences).
In short...true (want) vs false (not want) ignores change (need).
a) acceptance represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which tempts one to ignore balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
b) falling for suggested temptations (true vs false) diminishes those within reality; hence being resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
a) having awareness implies being differentiated into partial (perceiving) by whole (perceiving); hence being choice (reaction) within balance (enacting). Choice can only exist at the center of balance and balance can only exist at the center (momentum) of motion.
b) choose to value represents being evaluation (choice); which implies in response to value (balance). Choice within balance (need/want) is being tempted by suggested imbalance (want vs not want)...the latter represents the "many other options" suggested to you by the choices of others.
c) choice has no value to offer; it represents the evaluation (perceiving) of all already offered value (perceivable).
Being perceiving within perceivable representing everything being offered to each one is what allows the growth of each ones comprehension about all perceivable. One doesn't have to unlock reality; but struggle to grow within it. Everyone functions even with less comprehension; yet those who choose to struggle by adaptation to perceivable inspiration can utilize more and more about what they perceive.
Question....impression (perceivable) towards compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss) depending on choice. Breathing teaches one that.
Lastly; the suggested term "without" tempts one to ignore being "within". There cannot be a without within; since all represents one in energy; but one has the choice to ignore this.
The more skill one grows; the more one comprehends that there's no luck within perceivable. Energy represents a balance based; self sustaining system and it's internal power represents the balance of loss/growth aka velocity/resistance aka flow/form aka whole/partial aka balance/choice aka dying/living.
The house always wins because the habitation for the temporary (living) represents the ongoing (dying).
RELY', verb - "to rest on something" + REST, noun - "cessation of motion"....that represents the temptation to ignore perceivable reality (constant change) for suggested fiction (affixed information; brands; idols; names; numbers etc.)
Sleight of hand: "there's no rest for the WICKED, adjective - "to depart, to fall away"; hence for those temporary living within the ongoing process of dying.
Hold your breathe for a little rest an wait a little until the impressing motion will force adaptation from you. The ever changing moment you perceive; represents the momentum of ongoing motion aka the enacting balance for you as the reacting choice at the center.
Furthermore: "we all" tempts one to ignore being "one within all" aka ONE (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) of energy. Me; my wife and my children represent the sustenance of oneself from individual (blood) through collective (bloodline). Each one of us needs to sustain oneself; I cannot breathe for them no matter how much I want to. The suggested "we" tempts the individual one to shirk responsibility for the sustenance of oneself onto any suggested collective.
Look at NATION; noun "a people"...none of the suggested nations is controlled by its people. Why? Because each one of the people consents to the suggested umbrella "nation"; hence being tricked to believe in "we the people"; while ignoring to being the nation; being the people; expressing growth outwards.
a) "we" also tempts one to suggest in the name of others; hence perpetuating the few controlling the many through choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law.
b) if the living "strive to" then that implies towards death. The effort of living represents the struggle to resist the temptation of dying.
c) to be implies out of; hence in response to perceivable origin not towards suggested outcomes.
a) believing vs not believing represents the rebranding of wanting vs not wanting the suggested information by others. Perceivable inspiration doesn't require to be believed; it needs to be adapted to.
b) living represents the finite aspect; dying the infinite aspect of energy aka temporary growth within ongoing loss; both together representing the self sustaining core of energy.
c) the issue with comprehending "living forever" is that temporary living requires one to be able to perceive perceivable; which the ongoing process of dying doesn't require.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents the transmutation of ingredient out of base. Only the ingredient experiences the perceivable differentiation of base; not the base itself.
In short...living forever tempts one to ignore that the process of dying represents the FOR (forward) EVER (continuation) for all those within.
The perceiving ones can handle all perceivable; it's the efficiency that has to be grown individually. Fundamentally...living can handle dying.
The suggestion "kill yourself" represents a temptation until you choose to want or not want to kill yourself; then you shaped it into a deception. Suggestion represents the industrialization of temptation, and the only temptation within perceivable (need) represents ignoring it for suggested (want).
Another issue with telling others is that it perpetuates the suggested word; which tempts all who consent to ignore the perceivable sound. Using gematria underneath the spoken word and teaching the backwards writing of hebrew both grow ones resistance to the temptation of the suggested word (idolatry of perceivable sound).
That represents the suggested inversion of value (dying) setting evaluation (living). Living represents the struggle to try to resist the temptation of dying aka the highest value represents the evaluation thereof at the center.
If you choose to resist the temptation of suggested information by others you wouldn't see a wall of text; you wouldn't feel obligated to respond to what others suggest, and you wouldn't view what you read as conflicts of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; believing vs not believing; short vs long; under vs over; beauty vs ugly etc.).
What connects you to the world you live in represents you being able to perceive all perceivable inspiration; within which your reaction represents the representative.
How about trying to adapt to inspiration from any one sentence I wrote; while resisting to reason over it (conflict); but instead using implication (if/then). Like..."if motion represents direction (inception towards death) for those within (life); then as one within...?"
It's consenting to stand under (understanding) suggested information, which tempts one to feel like everything is over ones head. One needs to grow comprehension of perceivable inspiration to grow out of the temptation of suggested information.
Understanding restricts growth of comprehension; which is why others tempt you to understand what they suggest.
SORRY; noun - "grieve for loss". You are tempted as growth (living) to grieve for loss (dying). You need to resit that to be able to grow. Does one need to feel sorry for breathing or does one need to breathe; no matter what one feels sorry for?