It seems as if the end goal is to confine us all to smaller territory to preserve the outside world around us. History repeats itself. Has this happened before? According to our globe we have one entire blank side of our globe nothing but ocean. How illogical would it be to think that there is forgotten or protected lands on this world much like Antarctica.
I’m just speculating the cycles of control and how we might not have seen the whole hand being played due to the fact the human lifespan is incredibly limited.
If you choose to resist the temptation of suggested information by others you wouldn't see a wall of text; you wouldn't feel obligated to respond to what others suggest, and you wouldn't view what you read as conflicts of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; believing vs not believing; short vs long; under vs over; beauty vs ugly etc.).
What connects you to the world you live in represents you being able to perceive all perceivable inspiration; within which your reaction represents the representative.
How about trying to adapt to inspiration from any one sentence I wrote; while resisting to reason over it (conflict); but instead using implication (if/then). Like..."if motion represents direction (inception towards death) for those within (life); then as one within...?"
It's consenting to stand under (understanding) suggested information, which tempts one to feel like everything is over ones head. One needs to grow comprehension of perceivable inspiration to grow out of the temptation of suggested information.
Understanding restricts growth of comprehension; which is why others tempt you to understand what they suggest.
SORRY; noun - "grieve for loss". You are tempted as growth (living) to grieve for loss (dying). You need to resit that to be able to grow. Does one need to feel sorry for breathing or does one need to breathe; no matter what one feels sorry for?