Robot dog with machine gun
(youtu.be)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Just because it wasn't Boston dynamics doing it in this video, it would be foolish to think they're not also developing such a technology. Where do you think they get their funding from?
Didn't Woody Guthrie write a song about this thing? /s
op shill account that only comes out to shill
Since they have no regard for human life, if they added another gun facing backwards, they can achieve no recoil.
There are other ways to compensate for recoil.
this is some fake and gay looking cgi.
if you were really going to design a mobile gum platform it probably would be able to control recoil.
Here's the original video with sound:
https://twitter.com/sonicmega/status/1549651495997476864
Could you point out something that has been computer generated in it?
the fact that it's obvious cgi (just look at the completely uniform surfaces) or the fact that no engineer would design a gun platform without recoil requirements. could someone create a remote controlled gun platform, sure, but it wouldn't be this retarded that only retarded people believe it.
Sorry, but you need to show me how this is obvious. It is not obvious to me, but I am no expert.
The idea that "no engineer would design this" is by no means a fact. You cannot predict--let alone prove--such a thing because you can't know what is in the minds of all other people on earth.
Nobody but a pedophile would say such a thing. Using your logic, based on nothing more than my feelings, you're a pedophile and everyone knows it.
https://youtu.be/VqOdnCEbDU4
"Faaaaaaake"
No. You're fake and gay, princess.
I disagree with the speaker in two important ways.
I would argue that the whole point to using the drones is not only effectiveness, but to spare human lives. If the drone controllers find themselves in jeopardy, they should certainly be able to withdraw.
The next one is far more important, and speaks to globalism propaganda which doesn't surprise me in the least coming from Vice.
Pause and think. He argues that because governance by nation states is imperfect by allowing dictators to exist, the entire system needs to be collective (global). Ask yourself, what if the dictator were global? The ones being terrorized would be everyone on the planet and it would not be a situation of nothing being able to done, but of there being no one to do anything about it.
The risk of that happening is too great to adopt a system of global governance. The very system they want to use to do this is modelled after China.
If you've ever fired a gun more powerful than a .22, you know immediately this is a BS video. Added: engineering analysis shows that every shot would lift the front end of the dog a little; this then requires time for the platform to restabilize and the camera vision to readjust and be able to acquire targets.Thus limiting the fire rate to single shots. Auto repeated fire would merely be a spray on a jittering platform. The uniform concrete blocks show it's CGI.
You think AR-15 uses "high powered ammunition"?
You have no idea what you're talking about, bud.
This was out of that recent Amazon film?
Action film some black guy half cyborg goes to Ukraine fights Russians, full of dog droids, but wants to set a nuke off. What was it called. War film light entertainment. Yea those robot dogs were all over it. Plus a few other designs.
That would be an AK12 mounted on the pup. 7.62 has a reasonable punch to it.
This dog needs a firearm that has a cyclical rate that buffers recoil, like the old German FG42 and it would be more stable.
Looks
Lol, a toy gun and its stopping power. How cute, Barbara. AR 15s are for edge lord wannabes with 007 posters hung over their beds. https://www.wildernessarena.com/supplies/weapons/gunshots-wounds-stopping-power-myth-vs-fact
Keep posting more bullshit like you always have. And it's still a bullshit CGI video.
First it's CGI because you think 5.45 is some gigantic elephant killing bullet, now it's fake because it's a toy gun? Make up your mind
The argument you're up against is "blah blah technical limitations." You see that stuff when shills argue against solar energy, electric cars or fast Internet. Hell, I've even seen it when they oppose fast trains.