I disagree with the speaker in two important ways.

You can't just leave when you hear mines and explosions. If a drone is in the air, we must finish the mission.

I would argue that the whole point to using the drones is not only effectiveness, but to spare human lives. If the drone controllers find themselves in jeopardy, they should certainly be able to withdraw.

The next one is far more important, and speaks to globalism propaganda which doesn't surprise me in the least coming from Vice.

The system of collective security must be updated. Because if a dictator can be in charge of some country and terrorize all the neighbors, and no one can do anything, there's a serious flaw in the system.

Pause and think. He argues that because governance by nation states is imperfect by allowing dictators to exist, the entire system needs to be collective (global). Ask yourself, what if the dictator were global? The ones being terrorized would be everyone on the planet and it would not be a situation of nothing being able to done, but of there being no one to do anything about it.

The risk of that happening is too great to adopt a system of global governance. The very system they want to use to do this is modelled after China.