Hubble photos are fake like colorized, old-timey B&W photos are "fake".
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
PICTURE; noun - "captured moment" tempts others to ignore being within momentum. Now add suggested MOTION PICTURES and you have a suggested mimicry of perceivable reality. Why? Because since you're suggesting it and others consent to your suggestion...you can define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning at will for all others.
In short...suggested pictures represent the idolization of perceivable; moving symmetry.
It seems i am being targeted by some kind of "wow, you are sooooo deep!" bot.
That fucking bot does this to everybody and the mods won't stop it. The other alternative explanation is it's some guy with schizophrenia and a fixation on definitions, using software tools to post. Either way it's nuts and pure word salad. Consider it to be an annoying feral chicken and don't feed it.
yea it's mildly interesting but... it should present itself as a bot:
DEFINE, verb - "to end". Doesn't that ignore being alive aka ongoing and therefore not ended yet?
Fuck you, you poor schizo bastard.
What if all suggested words parse into perceivable sound? Entrance the guy pulling at the strings of ignorance...
CON (together) SPIRE (breathing)...are we or must one breathe alone?
SPONTANEOUSLY, adverb - "by its own force" implies EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.] - "internal or inherent power". It's the suggested "without" which tempts those "within" to ignore.
a) what if the repercussions of sound (echo) represents the dissonance (ignorance) of those within sound, who ignore to resonate with it?
b) the land (life) exists within the before (inception) and beyond (death); while the suggestion of "over the hinterland" tempts life (land) to go beyond (hinter) death.
a) notice that you acknowledge the ongoing (on and on...) while suggesting (there are) that the temporary (people; trees; environment) is defined by nothing (no)?
b) "no more" represents a contradiction in terms, since "more" implies the ongoing; while "no" denies it.
It's about ignorance... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0z8E-LBTcc
"He said: I'm gonna take you high"..."Gonna take you low"..."Gonna take you everywhere I go" aka flow (dying) is gonna take form (living) high (growth); low (loss) and everywhere it goes (inception towards death).
"But I can't stand it no, no more" aka form falling for the temptation to ignore resisting flow aka the ignorance of everything perceivable; while tempted by suggested nothing from others.
Aka ignorance (dark) as the soil for suggested deceptions (tricks).
EVENT', noun [Latin eventus, evenio; e and venio, to come.] - "that which comes, arrives or happens" aka the perceivable momentum of ongoing motion for the perceiving form within. Ignoring this allows others to tempt with the suggested mimicry of captured moments (picture) in motion (film).
This is what then allows directors to utilize reactors who suggest to be actors, as to tempt the onlookers to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death).
Another rhetorical inversion of being the reacting will (free will of choice) within the enacting (balance) of motion.
The suggestion that suggested outcomes represents a means to escape perceivable consequences of ongoing origin.
POSI'TION, noun [Latin positio, positus] - "state of being placed; situation"...that implies being temporary situated as the subject (reaction) through ongoing objectification (action).
POSI (positive; expressed) -TION (through action) aka the living represent the expression (POSI) within the impressing process of dying (-TION).
Who is to say one is wrong or right?
NASA is infiltrated with many masons. NASA is a government agency. Government has a bad track record of not telling the truth. How did we lose the ability to go to the moon when modern day technology is orders of magnitude more advanced than 1960's tech? Their story doesn't add up...