Hubble photos are fake like colorized, old-timey B&W photos are "fake".
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
CON (together) SPIRE (breathing)...are we or must one breathe alone?
SPONTANEOUSLY, adverb - "by its own force" implies EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.] - "internal or inherent power". It's the suggested "without" which tempts those "within" to ignore.
a) what if the repercussions of sound (echo) represents the dissonance (ignorance) of those within sound, who ignore to resonate with it?
b) the land (life) exists within the before (inception) and beyond (death); while the suggestion of "over the hinterland" tempts life (land) to go beyond (hinter) death.
a) notice that you acknowledge the ongoing (on and on...) while suggesting (there are) that the temporary (people; trees; environment) is defined by nothing (no)?
b) "no more" represents a contradiction in terms, since "more" implies the ongoing; while "no" denies it.
It's about ignorance... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0z8E-LBTcc
"He said: I'm gonna take you high"..."Gonna take you low"..."Gonna take you everywhere I go" aka flow (dying) is gonna take form (living) high (growth); low (loss) and everywhere it goes (inception towards death).
"But I can't stand it no, no more" aka form falling for the temptation to ignore resisting flow aka the ignorance of everything perceivable; while tempted by suggested nothing from others.
Aka ignorance (dark) as the soil for suggested deceptions (tricks).
EVENT', noun [Latin eventus, evenio; e and venio, to come.] - "that which comes, arrives or happens" aka the perceivable momentum of ongoing motion for the perceiving form within. Ignoring this allows others to tempt with the suggested mimicry of captured moments (picture) in motion (film).
This is what then allows directors to utilize reactors who suggest to be actors, as to tempt the onlookers to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death).
Another rhetorical inversion of being the reacting will (free will of choice) within the enacting (balance) of motion.
The suggestion that suggested outcomes represents a means to escape perceivable consequences of ongoing origin.
POSI'TION, noun [Latin positio, positus] - "state of being placed; situation"...that implies being temporary situated as the subject (reaction) through ongoing objectification (action).
POSI (positive; expressed) -TION (through action) aka the living represent the expression (POSI) within the impressing process of dying (-TION).
OR'GAN, noun - "a natural instrument of action or operation" aka action instructing the mind of reaction, yet LOGISTIC; from LOGIC (reason; calculation) and LOGOS (word; reason); from LEG; LOG (to collect; gather) implies as reaction in ignorance of action.
Reason represents a suggested conflict; calculation counts from a suggested 0; suggested words idolize perceivable sound, and collecting ignores that everything is available at any moment to each one within.
MAKE, verb - "to mold into shape". That's the suggested inversion of being within the mold (balance) while reshaping ourselves (choice). We represent the DRUM, noun - "a martial instrument of music"; hence the "mortal coil".
The ever changing circumstances you need to adapt to, as to sustain yourself, represent these repercussions of every choice made within sound. You ain't the fish being lured out of the water; but the human struggling to stay afloat; while being tempted to ignore struggling.
"need" implies "want"; which together (need/want) represent the balance for your choice at the center. Instead of CASK, noun - "a close vessel for containing liquors"; it's vessels (living) enclosed within the momentum of open spirit (dying).
Also; living isn't for keeping; but the process of growth (living) within loss (dying) for the self sustenance of energy.
And yet formed within the flowing source of heat.
"knowledge" implies perceivable everything; "nothing" represents a suggestion that tempts to ignore perceivable everything. All suggested words are designed to trick us into these rhetorical contradictions over and over again; which telegraphs the state of ignorance among the many to the few suggesting them words as tools of communication.
Notice that the most common defense of reasoning goes "no"...whatever they use to justify the no, not; nothing; nothingness is irrelevant to the outcome of ignoring everything.
I tried to rolling r thingy with my dog...he didn't like it. Me laughing while growling didn't ease his caution either.
That's simple...resist the temptation to suggest what "is" and instead express what you comprehend about what all that already "is" represents. Energy already is; I just write about how much I comprehend about its behavior, hence expressing myself as one behaving (or misbehaving) within.
What directions do those being moved from inception towards death need from others to sustain life? Why would the reaction (living) within direction (dying) suggest directions to others?
Let's look at another sleight of hand from the annoying ones...
"Only you can make all this change in me"..."For it's true, you are my destiny" "When you hold my hand I understand the magic that you do"..."You're my dream come true, my one and only you".
The "one and only you" implies "me" aka the perceiving one within the perceivable all. The few suggest "me" vs "you" to tempt the many to ignore being one within oneness. For oneself, all the other ones represent moving differences aka inspiration caused by the self differentiation of oneness (energy). It ain't you and me; but differences (living) within sameness (dying).
As for resident...the sleight of hand from the few goes "Resident Evil" (nippon original; Biohazard)...that's how they brand the ignorant many who choose to reside in ignorance of the perceivable reality; hence representing a biological hazard to everyone else.
Ignorance represents ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable); while the suggested message and the suggesting medium represent temptation for one to ignore need for want.
Your evaluation (good or better) implies consent to the suggested values of message and medium. Take any message or medium as perceivable inspiration and you can shape "good or better" growth out of it; which then doesn't require the "good or better" labels to reason over.
In short...whenever you find yourself tempted to evaluate anything suggested; take a breath and reevaluate your evaluating choice. The more you do; the more you comprehend about the origin of evaluating choice...the value of balance aka the only source of value for the choices within.
Would these tricks be amazing without amazed onlookers? In other words...do tricks require choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law? Could this represent tricking oneself to ignore temptation?
Aka a suggested right of admission tempting others to seek more suggestions.
The few do this to double down on consent from the many to suggested self destruction. Same with side-effects and ingredient lists of pharmaceuticals in combination with a price-tag. It's the allegory of "sign on the dotted line...here, down here; over there and twice underneath here". This is also one aspect of pushing regular updates for worse and worse products.
About six more weeks until harvest...
a) you represent the different reaction (living) within the same action (dying). Can you tell the difference between living and dying while being alive? What if you need to grow comprehension of perceivable (action) by adaptation (reaction) to it? The more you adapt to the process of dying; the more you comprehend about living within it.
b) PROP'ER, adjective [Latin proprius] - "peculiar; naturally or essentially belonging to a person or thing; not common"...does living belong to a person (per sonos aka by sound) or does it represent a part of the common process of dying (source of sound)?
c) "to tell" implies suggesting to others what perceivable means. If those others consent; they are tempted to ignore the perceivable source for you as the suggested substitute. This has being going on for so long that the many now believe that the need to tell each other what reality means; instead of adapting to predefined reality impressing upon them.
Back to the breathing example...try holding your breath while telling others what breathing means. Let's see what's more important...the perceivable need to breathe or the suggested explanation thereof? The many simply ignore reality for the fiction the few suggest them, and are now at the point of lacking to comprehend the consequences of ignorance.
a) you represent the single entry and charge (account) within the momentum of an ongoing system. You (life) are in-between coming (inception) and going (death) and you will be until the moment you're gone.
b) "never know" represents the contradiction of "everything perceivable (know) with the suggestion of "nothing ever" (never). Question how perception operates; while trying to find a position within perceivable for "nothing". The parasitic few simply suggest the word "nothing" as a branding for ones choice to ignore "everything" perceivable.
c) who's responsible for lack of "self" discernment? Could it be ones response-ability (choice) to grow self discernment? How could the account of one grow if trying to grow it within "nothing"?
You represent the commotion within the natural order aka the temporary resistance (living) within the ongoing velocity (dying). Living implies the agitation of struggling to resist the ongoing temptation of dying.
The many are tempted to blame suggested causes; instead of growing comprehension about being the effect within the only perceivable cause.
Both states of the bowl (expression/repression) coexist with each other as growth/loss aka balance (the momentum of motion). You represent the choice within the bowl to either grow within (living) or diminish yourself back out into the ongoing loss (dying).
The expression when yet another logger tells the same offensive joke... https://pic8.co/sh/rIMr5Q.jpg
Resist the temptation of formed water and tap the constant "flow" of perceivable inspiration...lots more to reckon in there.
"People ask me why"..."I never find a place to stop"..."And settle down, down, down"
"But I never wanted all those things"..."People need to justify"..."Their lives, lives, lives"
"Yes we were born, born...Born to be alive"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UaJAnnipkY
In other words...to be alive implies being born out of NATURE, noun - "born, produced"; hence in response to origin...not for the living.
The liver of life represents the temporary perception of the ongoing; only perceivable at this temporary moment. The motion of energy represents the origin, while the formed perception within represents being able to experience it temporarily, and more specifically...momentarily.
At this moment each of ones choices represents ones first step...there's no second within energy.
Being the perceiving one within all perceivable implies lacking comprehension of all perceivable for those perceiving it. The few suggest outcomes (want of everything) to tempt the many to ignore adapting to origin (need to grow one-thing within everything).
The temptation of want represents the temptation of dying; while ignoring the need to resist among the living. Temptation represents the "fast track" to a strained and shortened life.
Need/want represents the balance for ones choice within all perceivable. One doesn't need to restrict perceivable; one needs to grow comprehension thereof; which would increase efficiency of the consciousness memory to handle more and more of the perceivable.
"as much as needed" represents the temporary choice adapting to ongoing balance aka as much temporary resistance as needed within ongoing temptation. A perceived skirt too short represents both increasing temptation and decreasing resistance to it; hence inspiring the need to grow more resistance; while also tempting to want more of less (skirt that is).
Opinions represent suggested information; which tempts others to reason (want vs not want) about it. Resisting the temptation of reason (want vs not want) for implication (if/then) will show you what's going on... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sen8Tn8CBA4
What are they stealing from dogs? Their flees?
The good ol' metal to gold alchemy scheme.
Meanwhile one of the servers plugged the leftovers; put them on a hotspot and routed them for anonymous consumption.
The moving on implies being choice at the center of momentum until being moved to the finish.
Growth within loss aka living within the process of dying represents the scale; while the retired mind represents the state of being tempted by aging to ignore resisting (growth) temptation (loss).
Those lacking self discernment are tempted to fear "spending" remaining life by resisting dying; which ignores that all resistance represents a reinvestment.
CARD, verb - "to gain" + TRICK, noun (Latin intrico) - "to fold"...that tempts one to ignore that nature gives by unfolding.