One cannot make a dent in the "age of reason" by reasoning over the idols promoting it. Consenting to suggested over perceivable represents the source of idolatry, and the more suggested idols one destroys; the more power those suggesting the idols gain to rebuild; redefine, and reshape them. Only ones choice of need (perceivable inspiration) over want (suggested information) starves the potential of suggested idols.
Fake.
archive link or it didn't happen
This is obviously a fictitious article. Now look down at the comments to find fictitious users.
Minecraft time?
Minecraft time.
Fake or not, we owe him and I don't mean Valentine chocolates.
One cannot make a dent in the "age of reason" by reasoning over the idols promoting it. Consenting to suggested over perceivable represents the source of idolatry, and the more suggested idols one destroys; the more power those suggesting the idols gain to rebuild; redefine, and reshape them. Only ones choice of need (perceivable inspiration) over want (suggested information) starves the potential of suggested idols.
Is this real? I saw it but never checked it. Seems too much like they're baiting us with this one