It somewhat is the goals as well because the stated goals aren’t the real goals. When they say they want this or that, that’s the sales pitch like it always is. Their real goals are always achieved quickly: consolidating centralized power and control and eliminating individual autonomy. I don’t personally believe any of these people actually believe in the causes they claim to support because the means by which they want to achieve them have a complete track record of endlessly abject failure and death.
The same goes in the other direction, only in a more positive way. The stated goals of say libertarianism are always similar in the sense that the argument is that everything will be better, their means being doing that with less government control and less centralized power, which if given the chance they achieve immediately.
They could in theory curb carbon emissions to almost nothing if they took complete control of everything. The downside is that you’re part of the carbon they want to limit. They don’t at all change, they want everyone else to change while they fly around in private jets and eat beef and basically everything they’re telling people not to do. The people they tell to make it all happen also would be out of a job if they succeeded, so they never can. The people pushing for communism like the Canada guy know that. I mean he’s not stupid. All he actually wants is power and he panders to whatever’s popular to get and demonstrate it, like when he started trying to ban handguns because some kid in America used a rifle.
It’s the same with AOC. She just wants power and influence. She flat out makes shit up on prime time TV. She doesn’t care about any of the other stuff, she just wants power and influence. That’s the real goal for those people. Even Biden will change on a dime if it means more power. Before he fought against blacks because he thought they were crazy jungle people and now he tells them he’s fighting for them because it helped get him into office.
i dont understand how this can be justified even from a leftist standpoint.
People still need to eat so that food will have to be produced elsewhere producing the same "emissions". If the justification is global "climate change", those emissions in another country will still affect the world regardless of where it is created.
Or are people just not supposed to eat to save the world?
Should be neat to see how all the left-wing people railing against Ford and his "paving over our greenbelt" types will react if they are forced to chose between "Farmers" and "Trudeau"....
I mean we all know they will pick "Trudeau" far too much virtue has been signalled, too many blind eyes to too many scandals for them to abandon Pm.Blackface now - but it will sure be nice to watch them strip away yet another shred of dignity.
Dutch government is not going after grain growers you dumb fuck. The farmers affected by the regulations are those who have been poisoning the soil for decades with animal farming.
Of course, you don't know that because you are just parroting what others tell you to think.
These idiots aren't even pretending to make sense anymore
Every Communist Revolution sabotages the food supply after they quit pretending to care about "social justice" and "utopia."
This is where we need to make our stand.
When you declare CO2 is a problem, depopulation is the solution. In that context, everything they are doing makes sense.
It somewhat is the goals as well because the stated goals aren’t the real goals. When they say they want this or that, that’s the sales pitch like it always is. Their real goals are always achieved quickly: consolidating centralized power and control and eliminating individual autonomy. I don’t personally believe any of these people actually believe in the causes they claim to support because the means by which they want to achieve them have a complete track record of endlessly abject failure and death.
The same goes in the other direction, only in a more positive way. The stated goals of say libertarianism are always similar in the sense that the argument is that everything will be better, their means being doing that with less government control and less centralized power, which if given the chance they achieve immediately.
They could in theory curb carbon emissions to almost nothing if they took complete control of everything. The downside is that you’re part of the carbon they want to limit. They don’t at all change, they want everyone else to change while they fly around in private jets and eat beef and basically everything they’re telling people not to do. The people they tell to make it all happen also would be out of a job if they succeeded, so they never can. The people pushing for communism like the Canada guy know that. I mean he’s not stupid. All he actually wants is power and he panders to whatever’s popular to get and demonstrate it, like when he started trying to ban handguns because some kid in America used a rifle.
It’s the same with AOC. She just wants power and influence. She flat out makes shit up on prime time TV. She doesn’t care about any of the other stuff, she just wants power and influence. That’s the real goal for those people. Even Biden will change on a dime if it means more power. Before he fought against blacks because he thought they were crazy jungle people and now he tells them he’s fighting for them because it helped get him into office.
They’re the grifter class.
i dont understand how this can be justified even from a leftist standpoint.
People still need to eat so that food will have to be produced elsewhere producing the same "emissions". If the justification is global "climate change", those emissions in another country will still affect the world regardless of where it is created.
Or are people just not supposed to eat to save the world?
Should be neat to see how all the left-wing people railing against Ford and his "paving over our greenbelt" types will react if they are forced to chose between "Farmers" and "Trudeau"....
I mean we all know they will pick "Trudeau" far too much virtue has been signalled, too many blind eyes to too many scandals for them to abandon Pm.Blackface now - but it will sure be nice to watch them strip away yet another shred of dignity.
Zombies have more self-direction than these mops.
To be fair, the industrial revolution and its consequences were a disaster to the human race. Bring back manual farming.
I had no idea that Trudeau subscribed to Ted.
Dutch government is not going after grain growers you dumb fuck. The farmers affected by the regulations are those who have been poisoning the soil for decades with animal farming.
Of course, you don't know that because you are just parroting what others tell you to think.