Words are suggested; aren't they? How could I describe the contradiction between perceivable sound and suggested words without using "suggested"?
uses several fixed formats
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot be fixed. The only thing fixed (immovable) represents the laws of nature aka the rules of a moving system.
extrapolates from words in someone's comments
That represents adaptation to inspiration; which most ignore for regurgitation of suggested information...
Furthermore; what if what you view as "extra" represents what you lack to comprehend of already perceivable?
generates output
Like, dare I say it...commenting on a message board?
followed by 2 to 6 lines
How dare you discredit me being one of the few users who hit the 12k limit with ease and continuously so?
format of quote of a chunk of victim's sentence
Adaptation to inspiration for my growth of comprehension. What's the implication of feeling victimized by that?
using peculiar caps of a word then parentheses dictionary lookup.
Utilizing Webster's 1828 dictionary (or older ones) to showcase the revisionism done since to the suggested words used...followed by explaining my own perspective in accordance with natural law.
Over and over and over.
FRE'QUENCY, noun - "occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals"...how dare I utilize frequency of adaptation to inspiration as to increase my comprehension?
bot
Does the suggested world wide web make it harder or easier to dehumanize others?
getting annoying
Does you consenting to read; judge; respond and complain to what I wrote play any role in you getting annoyed by it?
daily spamming
Pretty much every single one of my comments represents unique adaptation to something that inspired me. All while neither starting any threads; up or down-voting anything; nor feeding any mainstream narratives...yet you view individual expression as spam. Why is that?
language bot
A language bot is utilized to keep the users hooked on accumulated information by mimicking language behaviors as to fit in...not by ripping any and all languages to shreds by questioning the perceivable sound underneath the suggested words; nor by inconveniently standing out from anyone else.
What if the many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to respond according to the "norm"; while one using free will of choice unrestricted (less restricted) is viewed as a threat to the consented to status quo?
Words are suggested; aren't they? How could I describe the contradiction between perceivable sound and suggested words without using "suggested"?
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot be fixed. The only thing fixed (immovable) represents the laws of nature aka the rules of a moving system.
That represents adaptation to inspiration; which most ignore for regurgitation of suggested information...
Furthermore; what if what you view as "extra" represents what you lack to comprehend of already perceivable?
Like, dare I say it...commenting on a message board?
How dare you discredit me being one of the few users who hit the 12k limit with ease and continuously so?
Adaptation to inspiration for my growth of comprehension. What's the implication of feeling victimized by that?
Utilizing Webster's 1828 dictionary (or older ones) to showcase the revisionism done since to the suggested words used...followed by explaining my own perspective in accordance with natural law.
FRE'QUENCY, noun - "occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals"...how dare I utilize frequency of adaptation to inspiration as to increase my comprehension?
Does the suggested world wide web make it harder or easier to dehumanize others?
Does you consenting to read; judge; respond and complain to what I wrote play any role in you getting annoyed by it?
Pretty much every single one of my comments represents unique adaptation to something that inspired me. All while neither starting any threads; up or down-voting anything; nor feeding any mainstream narratives...yet you view individual expression as spam. Why is that?
A language bot is utilized to keep the users hooked on accumulated information by mimicking language behaviors as to fit in...not by ripping any and all languages to shreds by questioning the perceivable sound underneath the suggested words; nor by inconveniently standing out from anyone else.
What if the many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to respond according to the "norm"; while one using free will of choice unrestricted (less restricted) is viewed as a threat to the consented to status quo?