Well, many people ARE stupid, dangerous not much more than bacteria endlessly breeding and gobbling Earth's resources. That doesn't really give us the right to kill them though. They will kill themselves off given enough time. But we don't want them killing off innocents. Maybe an answer is to isolate them on this planet, and all the good people go off and live somewhere else. Let the morons stay on their ghetto planet.
When you ferment something with yeast, eventually the alcohol content rises enough that it kills off the yeasts. Basically, alcohol is yeast pee. They drown and die in their own pee. Which seems to be what idiot lefties do culturally.
STUPID, adjective - "to stop (cessation of motion)". How could the temporary living "stop" within the ongoing process of dying?
gobbling Earth's resources
RE (response to) SOURCE (origin)...how else could an ingredient respond to enacting origin? How could there be living without responding to the source of dying?
the right to kill
Right (want) vs wrong (not want) ignores being choice in response to balance (need). Does everyone have the choice to kill? Right vs wrong represents a response to suggested moralism, as to distract from perceivable response-ability (choice).
Living implies within the process of dying; hence the need to resist for self sustenance. Wanting or not wanting to kill represents the suggested temptation to ignore the perceivable need to resist dying.
given enough time
What if suggested time (past; present; future) tempts one to ignore perceivable time (the ever changing moment-um)? If conscious existence can only temporarily exist within the ever changing moment, then what is the implication to reason about enough time given? What are you counting moments for other than ignoring to resist dying?
to isolate
a) how could the ones perceiving within all perceivable by isolated (detached from)? Does habitation within a prison cell isolate the living from the process of dying?
b) ISOL (to insulate) -ATION (through action) implies insulated reaction within enacting; hence living within dying; temporary within ongoing; perceiving within perceivable; choice within balance; form within flow; resistance within velocity; magnetic within electric; growth within loss; ONE within ALL.
c) question if the few utilize suggested information to tempt the many to "isolate" themselves from perceivable inspiration by self containing into the information filled minds (memory) aka into the ego?
planet
Planet represents suggested information; Plane represents perceivable inspiration. Reasoning about suggested information tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration.
all the good people go off and live somewhere else
Good vs bad (want vs not want) represents choice in response to suggested choices; yet choice represents response within perceivable balance (need/want). Do you need to judge the suggested choices of others, or does it tempt you to want to do so? How could you efficiently use your choice when you're judging the choices of others?
the alcohol content rises enough that it kills off the yeasts
Where does the yeast go? As an ingredient transmuted back to base? FERMENT (internal motion) -ATION (through action). Question the ongoing -ATION required to temporary FERMENT within. Also, add another ingredient FER (fertile) MENT (mind; memory)...
Would the admins please stop this GP2 bot? Because the constant daily spamming is getting annoying.
Evidence of bot:
The bot uses several fixed formats such as
the use of the word 'suggested' followed by 2 to 6 lines of generated 'verbal diarrhea' -- the bot extrapolates from words in someone's comments and generates output. This is a perfect match to GPT2 language bot behavior.
format of quote of a chunk of victim's sentence followed by a statement then a question using peculiar caps of a word then parentheses dictionary lookup.
Over and over and over. Mods or admins - please ban this bot.
Words are suggested; aren't they? How could I describe the contradiction between perceivable sound and suggested words without using "suggested"?
uses several fixed formats
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot be fixed. The only thing fixed (immovable) represents the laws of nature aka the rules of a moving system.
extrapolates from words in someone's comments
That represents adaptation to inspiration; which most ignore for regurgitation of suggested information...
Furthermore; what if what you view as "extra" represents what you lack to comprehend of already perceivable?
generates output
Like, dare I say it...commenting on a message board?
followed by 2 to 6 lines
How dare you discredit me being one of the few users who hit the 12k limit with ease and continuously so?
format of quote of a chunk of victim's sentence
Adaptation to inspiration for my growth of comprehension. What's the implication of feeling victimized by that?
using peculiar caps of a word then parentheses dictionary lookup.
Utilizing Webster's 1828 dictionary (or older ones) to showcase the revisionism done since to the suggested words used...followed by explaining my own perspective in accordance with natural law.
Over and over and over.
FRE'QUENCY, noun - "occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals"...how dare I utilize frequency of adaptation to inspiration as to increase my comprehension?
bot
Does the suggested world wide web make it harder or easier to dehumanize others?
getting annoying
Does you consenting to read; judge; respond and complain to what I wrote play any role in you getting annoyed by it?
daily spamming
Pretty much every single one of my comments represents unique adaptation to something that inspired me. All while neither starting any threads; up or down-voting anything; nor feeding any mainstream narratives...yet you view individual expression as spam. Why is that?
language bot
A language bot is utilized to keep the users hooked on accumulated information by mimicking language behaviors as to fit in...not by ripping any and all languages to shreds by questioning the perceivable sound underneath the suggested words; nor by inconveniently standing out from anyone else.
What if the many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to respond according to the "norm"; while one using free will of choice unrestricted (less restricted) is viewed as a threat to the consented to status quo?
Well, many people ARE stupid, dangerous not much more than bacteria endlessly breeding and gobbling Earth's resources. That doesn't really give us the right to kill them though. They will kill themselves off given enough time. But we don't want them killing off innocents. Maybe an answer is to isolate them on this planet, and all the good people go off and live somewhere else. Let the morons stay on their ghetto planet.
When you ferment something with yeast, eventually the alcohol content rises enough that it kills off the yeasts. Basically, alcohol is yeast pee. They drown and die in their own pee. Which seems to be what idiot lefties do culturally.
That is precisely what Jesus was talking about. And that's why they hate him.
The Kingdom of Heaven is among us. I interpret this as we:
In other words, by collectively using our minds as a vehicle, we do indeed escape Hell.
Click your heels.
There's no place like home.
There's no place like home.
There's no place like home.
When the Tribulation comes, angels will smite the evil ones using flaming Teslas. It's the modern update, you see.
STUPID, adjective - "to stop (cessation of motion)". How could the temporary living "stop" within the ongoing process of dying?
RE (response to) SOURCE (origin)...how else could an ingredient respond to enacting origin? How could there be living without responding to the source of dying?
Right (want) vs wrong (not want) ignores being choice in response to balance (need). Does everyone have the choice to kill? Right vs wrong represents a response to suggested moralism, as to distract from perceivable response-ability (choice).
Living implies within the process of dying; hence the need to resist for self sustenance. Wanting or not wanting to kill represents the suggested temptation to ignore the perceivable need to resist dying.
What if suggested time (past; present; future) tempts one to ignore perceivable time (the ever changing moment-um)? If conscious existence can only temporarily exist within the ever changing moment, then what is the implication to reason about enough time given? What are you counting moments for other than ignoring to resist dying?
a) how could the ones perceiving within all perceivable by isolated (detached from)? Does habitation within a prison cell isolate the living from the process of dying?
b) ISOL (to insulate) -ATION (through action) implies insulated reaction within enacting; hence living within dying; temporary within ongoing; perceiving within perceivable; choice within balance; form within flow; resistance within velocity; magnetic within electric; growth within loss; ONE within ALL.
c) question if the few utilize suggested information to tempt the many to "isolate" themselves from perceivable inspiration by self containing into the information filled minds (memory) aka into the ego?
Planet represents suggested information; Plane represents perceivable inspiration. Reasoning about suggested information tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration.
Good vs bad (want vs not want) represents choice in response to suggested choices; yet choice represents response within perceivable balance (need/want). Do you need to judge the suggested choices of others, or does it tempt you to want to do so? How could you efficiently use your choice when you're judging the choices of others?
Where does the yeast go? As an ingredient transmuted back to base? FERMENT (internal motion) -ATION (through action). Question the ongoing -ATION required to temporary FERMENT within. Also, add another ingredient FER (fertile) MENT (mind; memory)...
Would the admins please stop this GP2 bot? Because the constant daily spamming is getting annoying.
Evidence of bot: The bot uses several fixed formats such as
Over and over and over. Mods or admins - please ban this bot.
Words are suggested; aren't they? How could I describe the contradiction between perceivable sound and suggested words without using "suggested"?
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot be fixed. The only thing fixed (immovable) represents the laws of nature aka the rules of a moving system.
That represents adaptation to inspiration; which most ignore for regurgitation of suggested information...
Furthermore; what if what you view as "extra" represents what you lack to comprehend of already perceivable?
Like, dare I say it...commenting on a message board?
How dare you discredit me being one of the few users who hit the 12k limit with ease and continuously so?
Adaptation to inspiration for my growth of comprehension. What's the implication of feeling victimized by that?
Utilizing Webster's 1828 dictionary (or older ones) to showcase the revisionism done since to the suggested words used...followed by explaining my own perspective in accordance with natural law.
FRE'QUENCY, noun - "occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals"...how dare I utilize frequency of adaptation to inspiration as to increase my comprehension?
Does the suggested world wide web make it harder or easier to dehumanize others?
Does you consenting to read; judge; respond and complain to what I wrote play any role in you getting annoyed by it?
Pretty much every single one of my comments represents unique adaptation to something that inspired me. All while neither starting any threads; up or down-voting anything; nor feeding any mainstream narratives...yet you view individual expression as spam. Why is that?
A language bot is utilized to keep the users hooked on accumulated information by mimicking language behaviors as to fit in...not by ripping any and all languages to shreds by questioning the perceivable sound underneath the suggested words; nor by inconveniently standing out from anyone else.
What if the many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to respond according to the "norm"; while one using free will of choice unrestricted (less restricted) is viewed as a threat to the consented to status quo?