I would refer people to both stolenhistory.org and the historical work of Miles Mathis. What we call history is filled to the brim with these BS narratives. Innumerable "historical events" crumble upon inspection, proving even flimsier than the fairy tale of the "Moon landing".
A good place to start in reconstructing your world view is, "Nothing is like I always thought it was."
WW1, WW2 actually, the grave of the unknown solider. WW1 they ploughed the Germans back into the soil. But any Allied remains they gave a commission for. Germans were fertiliser. I have always wondered what happened to the actual Dday command post. It got ploughed back into Earth, recently unearthed within the last decade. It contradicted the narrative. This huge entrenchment heavily fortified, the central command, completely concreted in and buried over. What happened to anybody who surrendered. Hell, if they buried it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maisy_battery
What's done is done. But no surprise on this topic.
take all the fuckery happening in the current moment and then multiply it by all the instances of historical facts of the past. that's how hard it is to actually make sense of anything. there's nothing special about the current moment. recent not recent, that's not the point. the point is the past is even harder to discern than the present, not the other way around, like we were taught in school
RE'CENT, adjective [Latin recens.] - "new; being of late origin or existence".
a) "there's nothing new under the sun". Test this by trying to form a "new" thought without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration. The ones perceiving cannot add anything new into all perceivable. Why? Because ALL perceivable self differentiates into each ONE perceiving it from within.
b) ask yourself if there can exist anything perceivable beyond the ever changing moment? Afterwards question being form (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death).
c) what if the parasitic few use suggestion to tempt the many to ignore moment(um) by distracting them with suggested past; present and future; which when consented to allows them to narrate his-story; hopes; fears and so on?
d) what if you represent the accumulation of all that was; the response to all that is and the choice to shape all that will be? Wouldn't it be very beneficial for others to tempt you to ignore such comprehension; such potential; such finite access to an infinite source?
I would refer people to both stolenhistory.org and the historical work of Miles Mathis. What we call history is filled to the brim with these BS narratives. Innumerable "historical events" crumble upon inspection, proving even flimsier than the fairy tale of the "Moon landing".
A good place to start in reconstructing your world view is, "Nothing is like I always thought it was."
WW1, WW2 actually, the grave of the unknown solider. WW1 they ploughed the Germans back into the soil. But any Allied remains they gave a commission for. Germans were fertiliser. I have always wondered what happened to the actual Dday command post. It got ploughed back into Earth, recently unearthed within the last decade. It contradicted the narrative. This huge entrenchment heavily fortified, the central command, completely concreted in and buried over. What happened to anybody who surrendered. Hell, if they buried it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maisy_battery
What's done is done. But no surprise on this topic.
Carnavores don't make good fertilizer.
take all the fuckery happening in the current moment and then multiply it by all the instances of historical facts of the past. that's how hard it is to actually make sense of anything. there's nothing special about the current moment. recent not recent, that's not the point. the point is the past is even harder to discern than the present, not the other way around, like we were taught in school
a) "there's nothing new under the sun". Test this by trying to form a "new" thought without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration. The ones perceiving cannot add anything new into all perceivable. Why? Because ALL perceivable self differentiates into each ONE perceiving it from within.
b) ask yourself if there can exist anything perceivable beyond the ever changing moment? Afterwards question being form (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death).
c) what if the parasitic few use suggestion to tempt the many to ignore moment(um) by distracting them with suggested past; present and future; which when consented to allows them to narrate his-story; hopes; fears and so on?
d) what if you represent the accumulation of all that was; the response to all that is and the choice to shape all that will be? Wouldn't it be very beneficial for others to tempt you to ignore such comprehension; such potential; such finite access to an infinite source?