A lot of people on this site use statistics like that to dive straight into racism, but let's look at the big picture for a second.
Some merchant aliens come to Earth and snatch up a whole horde of people and carry them off to distant galaxy RockSupernova to be slaves.
After a couple, like what -- four? -- generations, the citizens of RockSupernova decide they don't want slaves and then just cut them all loose in society.
Then four generations later, those people still wouldn't entirely fit in, because they haven't had the millennia of experience building the culture that they're now expected to be a contributor to.
By now their original culture is foreign to them, and their slave culture's gone. What do?
Alright, now explain murder rates in Sub-Saharan Africa. And keep in mind that Ethiopia was never colonized, yet is right up there with the rest of them.
I don't know how technological Lesotho is, but I know South Africa has a strong start.
So it's the same thing. A whole segment of society rapidly advances, leaving a subculture behind, and that subculture can either learn to assimilate, eat itself or react violently toward those who've advanced.
Colonialism made them violent? India, southeast Asia, and the entire Western hemisphere were also colonized, why isn't a single nation from those regions ranked higher than Ethiopia, which was never colonized?
"Society advances" not by accident but through tremendous sacrifice and intentional effort. Blaming the people trying to help us improve for the actions of antagonistic subcultures is blaming the victim.
It's also a tool used by cultural Marxists to seize power from productive parts of society that they can use to push their selfish political agenda.
A lot of people on this site use statistics like that to dive straight into racism, but let's look at the big picture for a second.
Some merchant aliens come to Earth and snatch up a whole horde of people and carry them off to distant galaxy RockSupernova to be slaves.
After a couple, like what -- four? -- generations, the citizens of RockSupernova decide they don't want slaves and then just cut them all loose in society.
Then four generations later, those people still wouldn't entirely fit in, because they haven't had the millennia of experience building the culture that they're now expected to be a contributor to.
By now their original culture is foreign to them, and their slave culture's gone. What do?
Just something to figure on.
Alright, now explain murder rates in Sub-Saharan Africa. And keep in mind that Ethiopia was never colonized, yet is right up there with the rest of them.
https://files.catbox.moe/u9optj.png
I don't know how technological Lesotho is, but I know South Africa has a strong start.
So it's the same thing. A whole segment of society rapidly advances, leaving a subculture behind, and that subculture can either learn to assimilate, eat itself or react violently toward those who've advanced.
Computahs!
Colonialism made them violent? India, southeast Asia, and the entire Western hemisphere were also colonized, why isn't a single nation from those regions ranked higher than Ethiopia, which was never colonized?
I just looked up Ethiopia, and they' seem to be advancing largely on their own.
I mean, if you're dead-set on finding a reason to discount someone just for the color of their skin, I'm not going to lift a finger to stop you.
...I'll just lump you in with them...
"Society advances" not by accident but through tremendous sacrifice and intentional effort. Blaming the people trying to help us improve for the actions of antagonistic subcultures is blaming the victim.
It's also a tool used by cultural Marxists to seize power from productive parts of society that they can use to push their selfish political agenda.