So, as you are all aware, in the last decades the propaganda of Climate Change has risen exponentially, despite the global temperature having contradicted this assumption several times.

And what is interesting is that the propaganda for climate change started to get pushed heavily precisely in the decade when all major OIL WARS started happening. Aka the 90s, and 2000s.

And interestingly, these wars and the Climate Change propaganda, also coincide with the Peak Oil production/extraction. Meaning that after that point the global rate of oil extraction/production would fall or even if constant it would be less profitable economically.

THE THEORY. All wars happen for resources. Might is Right. In this optic even the Ukraine-Russia war, and generally the hostility of the West towards Russia is because the West wants to rob Russia of its natural resources. The aggression towards Russia has happened in a strategical way since the fall of the SU in the 90s.

Now, the Climate Change thing. I believe that the Climate Change thing is a cover for Peak Oil. You would ask, but AOH, why would they need to create a fake excuse? Well, the reasoning is simple. And imo is 2-fold. To make ppl believe that we are taking economic, social, political, cultural measures in order to defend the planet and because We Choose to Do So, not because we were obligated to do so. If they admit to Peak Oil being the real reason for the push for alternative/complementary forms of energy, then this "altruistic" component would disappear, and Humanity in general would probably fall into chaos.

In this regard, it would be interesting to make a graph and see if the push for alternative forms of energy has any correlation with the rate of decline in global reserves of oil.

Btw, shale oil produced a slight delay in the Peak, but that is insignificant and in the long term unsustainable.