a) TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Greek. art, and word or discourse.]
b) the artificial (suggestion) operates within the natural (perception).
c) if each of the many ignores using their choice by consenting to suggestions; then the few who utilize their choice become the chosen ones aka the elite (selection; choice).
d) AI aka artificial (suggested information) Intelligence (understanding aka standing under suggested information) represents the inversion of NC aka natural (perceivable inspiration) comprehension (comprehending perceived inspiration by adapting to it).
imagine what they're up to
Aka ignoring that which is for suggestions of what could be. It's that ignorance that is being parasitically exploited.
a) OBNOX'IOUS, adjective [Latin obnoxius; ob and noxius, hurtful, from noceo.] - "subject; answerable; liable; exposed; not approved".
Let's take that apart...as the perceiving I represent the subject of the objectifying perceivable; answerable implies the choices of others to answer; liable represents the status quo for being choice at the center of balance (need/want); hence choice representing ones response-ability; I try to express the impressed perceivable inspiration; which in return exposes the deception within the suggested information by others, and approval represents the ignorance of others who were tempted into the conflict of reason aka want (approval) vs not want (disapproval). In reality to be implies out of; hence me existing implying that justification isn't required since I already exist.
b) what if the ignorant many are being domesticated by the suggested narratives of the few to respond to sameness aka "the norm for behavior"; which in return tricks them to oppose perceivable differences; like for example the use of less restricted free will of choice for expression?
What if everything perceivable represents moving differences aka communicated inspiration towards perceiving senses? Could the parasitic few use the suggestion of sameness aka E pluribus unum (out of many one) to tempt the many to ignore being different, and needing to adapt to perceivable differences to sustain themselves?
Could the many be so ignorant that the few can use the suggested umbrella of "unity" to tempt them to join together; while ignoring "untias" (the state of being one; oneness); while also being simultaneously tempted to unite against "diversity" (difference)?
monkeymagic
a) MAG'IC, noun [Latin magia] - "the secret operations of natural causes". What if that represents the suggested inversion of a system that communicates ALL (perceivable) to each ONE (perceiving) within; so that those within can each grow their comprehension of perceived by adapting to it?
b) if the MOoN represents a KEY; what could it unlock?
a) TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Greek. art, and word or discourse.]
b) the artificial (suggestion) operates within the natural (perception).
c) if each of the many ignores using their choice by consenting to suggestions; then the few who utilize their choice become the chosen ones aka the elite (selection; choice).
d) AI aka artificial (suggested information) Intelligence (understanding aka standing under suggested information) represents the inversion of NC aka natural (perceivable inspiration) comprehension (comprehending perceived inspiration by adapting to it).
Aka ignoring that which is for suggestions of what could be. It's that ignorance that is being parasitically exploited.
you have one of the most obnoxious writing styles i’ve ever seen anywhere.
a) OBNOX'IOUS, adjective [Latin obnoxius; ob and noxius, hurtful, from noceo.] - "subject; answerable; liable; exposed; not approved".
Let's take that apart...as the perceiving I represent the subject of the objectifying perceivable; answerable implies the choices of others to answer; liable represents the status quo for being choice at the center of balance (need/want); hence choice representing ones response-ability; I try to express the impressed perceivable inspiration; which in return exposes the deception within the suggested information by others, and approval represents the ignorance of others who were tempted into the conflict of reason aka want (approval) vs not want (disapproval). In reality to be implies out of; hence me existing implying that justification isn't required since I already exist.
b) what if the ignorant many are being domesticated by the suggested narratives of the few to respond to sameness aka "the norm for behavior"; which in return tricks them to oppose perceivable differences; like for example the use of less restricted free will of choice for expression?
What if everything perceivable represents moving differences aka communicated inspiration towards perceiving senses? Could the parasitic few use the suggestion of sameness aka E pluribus unum (out of many one) to tempt the many to ignore being different, and needing to adapt to perceivable differences to sustain themselves?
Could the many be so ignorant that the few can use the suggested umbrella of "unity" to tempt them to join together; while ignoring "untias" (the state of being one; oneness); while also being simultaneously tempted to unite against "diversity" (difference)?
a) MAG'IC, noun [Latin magia] - "the secret operations of natural causes". What if that represents the suggested inversion of a system that communicates ALL (perceivable) to each ONE (perceiving) within; so that those within can each grow their comprehension of perceived by adapting to it?
b) if the MOoN represents a KEY; what could it unlock?