It's the few who suggest problems such as "air rage"; which tempts the many to reason (want vs not want) about it among themselves; which in return allows the few to utilize the solution (ongoing motion) to grow more corruptions into it (like terrorism; threats to homeland security and epidemics) towards pre-defined goals such as separating the many from access to air-travel.
In short: "look over here; not over there...and now you're fucked"
Want (short) versus not want (long) caused by consent to suggested information (want); while ignoring perceived inspiration (need).
It doesn't matter how much; how often or towards how many I write...only you wield the choice to resist the above. If you would choose inspiration; then you would plug whatever inspires from whatever I write and use it for adaptation. It is your want for information that makes a "wall of text" a not wanted suggestion. When you adapt to inspiration you also don't need to read the whole thing to then formulate your responses: since you learn to simply adapt on the fly to anything.
you lose many of us
I'm still around doing my stuff. If other choose to ignore that; then isn't that exactly what I'm writing about? On top of that...I use the comments of others as inspiration to adapt, so this isn't me offering a thread for others. I shape what others express; yet they ignore their own expressions being shaped, and what that implies for the choice they wield? I'm working on that very ignorance; yet I only wield the choice to challenge my own ignorance.
Junionthepipeline 20 days ago: "Sure.you just get more the lazy or melatonin enhanced or combo thereof. You get 28 bucks a month latanaqueesha who has never worked gets fifteen hundred"
That was the last response over one sentence you made here. This behavior represents the maintenance of conflicts of reason, hence utilizing suggestion to incite the continuation of conflicts among others; which implies subverting others from sustaining life while tempting them towards death.
It's the few who suggest problems such as "air rage"; which tempts the many to reason (want vs not want) about it among themselves; which in return allows the few to utilize the solution (ongoing motion) to grow more corruptions into it (like terrorism; threats to homeland security and epidemics) towards pre-defined goals such as separating the many from access to air-travel.
In short: "look over here; not over there...and now you're fucked"
This is a good size for your comments. When you make novel length comments in truthuracy style you lose many of us.
Want (short) versus not want (long) caused by consent to suggested information (want); while ignoring perceived inspiration (need).
It doesn't matter how much; how often or towards how many I write...only you wield the choice to resist the above. If you would choose inspiration; then you would plug whatever inspires from whatever I write and use it for adaptation. It is your want for information that makes a "wall of text" a not wanted suggestion. When you adapt to inspiration you also don't need to read the whole thing to then formulate your responses: since you learn to simply adapt on the fly to anything.
I'm still around doing my stuff. If other choose to ignore that; then isn't that exactly what I'm writing about? On top of that...I use the comments of others as inspiration to adapt, so this isn't me offering a thread for others. I shape what others express; yet they ignore their own expressions being shaped, and what that implies for the choice they wield? I'm working on that very ignorance; yet I only wield the choice to challenge my own ignorance.
Worst bot ever
That was the last response over one sentence you made here. This behavior represents the maintenance of conflicts of reason, hence utilizing suggestion to incite the continuation of conflicts among others; which implies subverting others from sustaining life while tempting them towards death.