"full" ignores being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death); hence less than full within full.
"spectrum" (visible form) ignores that the few use suggested information to tempt the many to ignore perceived inspiration (visible form).
"dominance" ignores being "free" will of choice at the center of the "dom"inance of perceived balance aka free-dom. The suggested choices of others can only dominate when one consents to their choices; while ignoring to be choice within balance.
must assume the role of trustee of the material universe for future generations
a) ASSU'ME, verb transitive [Latin assumo, of ad and sumo, to take.] - "to take upon one"...aka to take what is consented to by those who ignore that ALL is given to each ONE within.
b) "trustee" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law establishing a livestock under a trustee.
c) "material universe" represents being ONE form (life) within ALL flow (inception towards death); hence material form within immaterial flow.
d) "future" represents ignoring that which is perceivable (momentum) for suggestions about what will be (future).
e) generation (generated by action) implies being reaction (form) within action (flow).
the management has to serve society
a) MAN'AGE, verb - "to conduct; to carry on; to direct the concerns of" + MENT (mind; memory) aka utilizing suggestions to direct consenting form back into flow; while they ignore being the resistance (life) to velocity (inception towards death).
b) SERVE, verb [Latin servio] - "in the employment of another" aka if the many ignore each to utilize their choice; then the few become the "chosen ones"; hence employed by the consenting minds of others.
c) SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin societas, from socius, a companion] - "a number of persons united". Person (per sonos; by sound) implies being differentiated out of same sound; hence unitas; the state of being one; oneness; not togetherness.
This isn’t a minimalist lifestyle we’re talking about.
Being the one perceiving all perceivable implies being minimal within maximal. Living represents the temporary choice to grow within the constant loss of dying. The many are tricked by the few to define their lifestyles but what's being suggested to them (society); while the ignore that everything is offered towards their perception.
Those of us who have a life consider this a declaration of war.
a) having a life implies being born out of NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced]; hence in response to origin.
b) to be able to respond as "free" will of choice implies being within the "dom"inance of perceivable balance aka free-dom. Choosing to ignore perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want versus not want); which represents the state of WAR, noun [Greek., to perplex, embroil, disturb] - "state of opposition or contest; enmity; disposition to contention".
Underneath the suggested us vs them conflicts operates your choice of want vs not want; which others rebrand to keep you ignorant towards need. Those who want a suggestion and those who don't want a suggestion are being tricked into fighting each other over a suggestion by a 3rd party; while ignoring perceived need.
c) DECLA'RE, verb transitive [Latin to make clear.]...hence DECLARE (to make clear) -ATION (by action). As choice within balance; form (life) within flow (inception towards death) you represent the "reaction" enacted upon. Enlightenment comes from adaptation to the perceived source of light.
The parasitic utilize the term "declaration" to tempt to many to ignore being the declared response. If the many declare among themselves; then that represents suggestion in ignorance of perception. That ain't light (enlightenment); it's darkness (ignorance).
d) war implies versus peace; which not only represents yet another rebrand of want vs not want reasoning, but suggests PEACE, noun [Latin pax, paco, to appease.] - "freedom from disturbance or agitation"; which ignores that life being moved from inception towards death represents constant agitation; hence being resistance to velocity aka struggling to stay alive while being processed towards death.
Full spectrum dominance.
"full" ignores being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death); hence less than full within full.
"spectrum" (visible form) ignores that the few use suggested information to tempt the many to ignore perceived inspiration (visible form).
"dominance" ignores being "free" will of choice at the center of the "dom"inance of perceived balance aka free-dom. The suggested choices of others can only dominate when one consents to their choices; while ignoring to be choice within balance.
Karl Marx: "The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property."
Klaus Schwab: "In 2030, you will own nothing, and be happy."
Something sounds familiar, no?
This is a straight up nasty admission
we will hold on to your wallet for you. dont worry its in you best interest.
a) ASSU'ME, verb transitive [Latin assumo, of ad and sumo, to take.] - "to take upon one"...aka to take what is consented to by those who ignore that ALL is given to each ONE within.
b) "trustee" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law establishing a livestock under a trustee.
c) "material universe" represents being ONE form (life) within ALL flow (inception towards death); hence material form within immaterial flow.
d) "future" represents ignoring that which is perceivable (momentum) for suggestions about what will be (future).
e) generation (generated by action) implies being reaction (form) within action (flow).
a) MAN'AGE, verb - "to conduct; to carry on; to direct the concerns of" + MENT (mind; memory) aka utilizing suggestions to direct consenting form back into flow; while they ignore being the resistance (life) to velocity (inception towards death).
b) SERVE, verb [Latin servio] - "in the employment of another" aka if the many ignore each to utilize their choice; then the few become the "chosen ones"; hence employed by the consenting minds of others.
c) SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin societas, from socius, a companion] - "a number of persons united". Person (per sonos; by sound) implies being differentiated out of same sound; hence unitas; the state of being one; oneness; not togetherness.
This isn’t a minimalist lifestyle we’re talking about. Those of us who have a life consider this a declaration of war.
Being the one perceiving all perceivable implies being minimal within maximal. Living represents the temporary choice to grow within the constant loss of dying. The many are tricked by the few to define their lifestyles but what's being suggested to them (society); while the ignore that everything is offered towards their perception.
a) having a life implies being born out of NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced]; hence in response to origin.
b) to be able to respond as "free" will of choice implies being within the "dom"inance of perceivable balance aka free-dom. Choosing to ignore perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want versus not want); which represents the state of WAR, noun [Greek., to perplex, embroil, disturb] - "state of opposition or contest; enmity; disposition to contention".
Underneath the suggested us vs them conflicts operates your choice of want vs not want; which others rebrand to keep you ignorant towards need. Those who want a suggestion and those who don't want a suggestion are being tricked into fighting each other over a suggestion by a 3rd party; while ignoring perceived need.
c) DECLA'RE, verb transitive [Latin to make clear.]...hence DECLARE (to make clear) -ATION (by action). As choice within balance; form (life) within flow (inception towards death) you represent the "reaction" enacted upon. Enlightenment comes from adaptation to the perceived source of light.
The parasitic utilize the term "declaration" to tempt to many to ignore being the declared response. If the many declare among themselves; then that represents suggestion in ignorance of perception. That ain't light (enlightenment); it's darkness (ignorance).
d) war implies versus peace; which not only represents yet another rebrand of want vs not want reasoning, but suggests PEACE, noun [Latin pax, paco, to appease.] - "freedom from disturbance or agitation"; which ignores that life being moved from inception towards death represents constant agitation; hence being resistance to velocity aka struggling to stay alive while being processed towards death.