interesting larp, although a bit too much biblical/spiritual talk for me. reminds me of that u/free-will-of-choice who talks like an autist. Also Kyle Odom's manifesto.
Its probably a good thing that the people who make up these claims don't realize how retarded their style is. Just saying if I believed in this junk, I'd have enough common sense to at least talk about it in a more appealable manner (not so matter-of-factly) until I had proof.
Like powerful pervs having anal sex with 4 year olds is a good enough story. Simple explanation is that its done before the kid knows better and gains the ability to report the priest. I don't see the need to get into fairy-tales that there is mind-control and code-word-that-can-be-activated-30-years-later involved. I'm not disturbed by anything except the lack of evidence. I think a few CIA agents had too much fun drugging weak-minded parents/kiddies and then putting lizard ideas in their head.
I didn't read every word but was getting a bit too much "forget about doing anything meaningful to the corrupt politicians of current day, just pray to jesus and jump in this historical rabbithole, goyims" vibe. Also, I hope people aren't spending money on this entertainment and q-anon junk. non-paywall parasite pill https://files.catbox.moe/9rbtxh.pdf
Take the suggested -ist; -ism out of it and you've got (greek; auto) -"automated; self". Being self implies being automated by motion; hence being the responding formed expression of self within motion. All these -ism are suggested by the parasitic few to tempt the many to ignore growing self discernment.
don't realize how retarded their style is
a) STYLE, noun [from the root of the Teutonic stellen, to set or place.]...you represent the response to placement and being set into.
b) what you would describe as an individual style is based on seeking confirmation from the collective. The parasitic few suggested individualism to the ignorant many who already consented to suggested collectivism; who believe to be part of civilizations; nations; cities; teams; races; religions; in-group preferences; movements; followers of leaders; economical designated groups etc.
c) RET'ARD, verb transitive [Latin retardo; re and tardo, to delay] - "to diminish the velocity of motion; to hinder; to render more slow in progress". Life is being progressed from inception towards death; hence the resisting response to the velocity of motion; yet one cannot slow down dying; only grow life more resilient while dying.
if I believed in this junk
That's the issue within you aka your choice of want (believing) versus not want (not believing) the suggested information by others. What I'm talking about isn't within that self imposed conflict of reason (want vs not want)...I describe the ignored need (perceived) underneath the consented to want (suggested).
You're domesticated to choose different sides within the same conflict; while those who're suggesting what to conflict over are also keep rebranding the sides to prevent you from comprehending that every conflict represents your choice of want vs not want; while ignoring need.
You neither have to believe; not not believe what you thing I suggest. You need to adapt to whatever inspires you, while resisting the temptation to consent to whatever information others are suggesting you. Only you can wield the choice to do that. Porn represents just a suggested temptation until you choosing to grab your dick; shape it into a genocide by self sacrifice; while empowering those who suggest porn to industrialize it against everyone.
I'd have enough common sense to at least talk about it in a more appealable manner
a) look at the so called NPC's...what are they consenting to? Suggested mass appeal. Whatever narrative the parasitic few are pushing just has to be shaped appealing enough to tempt the ignorant many to consent to it. How to make burning; looting and murdering appealing to the many? Well...black lives matter; don't they?
b) sensing represents individual response to common perception. We all perceive the same origin differently; because we each represent a differentiation out of the same origin.
until I had proof
What's the proof for life; while running out of it? When will life reach truth? At death? What's the lie in being moved from inception towards death?
You want suggested proof (fiction); while ignoring the need to adapt to perceived reality; where everything already exists. It's the "until" that represents your life being moved from inception towards death aka living (growth) within the process of dying (loss).
Simple explanation is that its done before the kid knows better and gains the ability to report the priest.
Aka before one grows resistance to the temptation of suggestions by others. Sodomy represents want (lust tempting towards death) over need (conception for the propagation of life). And the choice at the center of need/want balance; is being targeted by choice of force (sodomy) through others; hence trying to first break free will; then subject it to the will of those dominating it. Meanwhile; only balance represents dominance for the free will of choice at its center, which can only be ignored; not broken.
I don't see the need to get into fairy-tales that there is mind-control and code-word-that-can-be-activated-30-years-later involved.
Suggesting mind control by words tempts to ignore mind responding to perceived sound; hence existing within a controlled environment. When other suggest you the whole MK-Ultra; Elan School story, then they aim at your consent to their suggestion; which could also be recipes or Garfield cartoons. What matters is choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which allows those suggesting to control what those consenting put into their minds at their own free will.
I'm not disturbed by anything except the lack of evidence.
EV'IDENT, adjective - "plain; open to be seen"...that represents perceivable inspiration; yet you are looking for suggested information by others as proof. Perceivable nature doesn't lack anything; it represents everything with you as the growth potential within.
I think a few CIA agents had too much fun drugging weak-minded parents/kiddies and then putting lizard ideas in their head.
CENTRAL(choice within balance) INTELLIGENCE (understanding aka standing under the suggested information by others) AGENCY (actor; which ignores that choice within balance represents a reactor enacted upon).
As a sleight of hand the parasitic few suggest "actors"; while the many ignore that actors having directors implies them representing reaction to direction aka form (life) to flow (inception towards death). And what is it that the ignorant many do instead? They mimic acting; hence reacting to what is enacted upon them.
forget about doing anything meaningful
The issue here is that the many are tricked to consent to suggested meaning by the few; predominately progressivism aka wanting outcomes; while ignoring the need to adapt to origin. Balance represents ALL value for each ONEs evaluating choice within. Balance (need/want) communicates meaning; not the choices of others suggesting imbalance (want vs not want).
Example...I want an apple ignores the need to adapt as seed to soil to propagate growth until apple as the fruit of ones (seed) labor in response to all (soil) origin.
non-paywall parasite pill
Parasitic behavior reacts to host weakness. The parasitic few respond with suggestion (fiction) to the many ignoring perception (reality), and ignorance (want over need) represents the self inflicted weakness by choice. A tick isn't a parasite; it responds to you venturing near it; hence opportunistically exploits your weakness parasitically. The difference between suggested parasite and perceived parasitic behavior; is that the latter implicates a moving system; while the former reasons about an affixed state. It's the momentum (balance) of a moving system which causes the host/parasite dynamic, and the many ignoring this balance is what causes the few exploiting it by suggesting imbalance.
Interesting interview. No idea if any of it is true but I liked his theory that all people named Joseph are child sodomizers.
interesting larp, although a bit too much biblical/spiritual talk for me. reminds me of that u/free-will-of-choice who talks like an autist. Also Kyle Odom's manifesto.
Its probably a good thing that the people who make up these claims don't realize how retarded their style is. Just saying if I believed in this junk, I'd have enough common sense to at least talk about it in a more appealable manner (not so matter-of-factly) until I had proof.
Like powerful pervs having anal sex with 4 year olds is a good enough story. Simple explanation is that its done before the kid knows better and gains the ability to report the priest. I don't see the need to get into fairy-tales that there is mind-control and code-word-that-can-be-activated-30-years-later involved. I'm not disturbed by anything except the lack of evidence. I think a few CIA agents had too much fun drugging weak-minded parents/kiddies and then putting lizard ideas in their head.
I didn't read every word but was getting a bit too much "forget about doing anything meaningful to the corrupt politicians of current day, just pray to jesus and jump in this historical rabbithole, goyims" vibe. Also, I hope people aren't spending money on this entertainment and q-anon junk. non-paywall parasite pill https://files.catbox.moe/9rbtxh.pdf
Take the suggested -ist; -ism out of it and you've got (greek; auto) -"automated; self". Being self implies being automated by motion; hence being the responding formed expression of self within motion. All these -ism are suggested by the parasitic few to tempt the many to ignore growing self discernment.
a) STYLE, noun [from the root of the Teutonic stellen, to set or place.]...you represent the response to placement and being set into.
b) what you would describe as an individual style is based on seeking confirmation from the collective. The parasitic few suggested individualism to the ignorant many who already consented to suggested collectivism; who believe to be part of civilizations; nations; cities; teams; races; religions; in-group preferences; movements; followers of leaders; economical designated groups etc.
c) RET'ARD, verb transitive [Latin retardo; re and tardo, to delay] - "to diminish the velocity of motion; to hinder; to render more slow in progress". Life is being progressed from inception towards death; hence the resisting response to the velocity of motion; yet one cannot slow down dying; only grow life more resilient while dying.
That's the issue within you aka your choice of want (believing) versus not want (not believing) the suggested information by others. What I'm talking about isn't within that self imposed conflict of reason (want vs not want)...I describe the ignored need (perceived) underneath the consented to want (suggested).
You're domesticated to choose different sides within the same conflict; while those who're suggesting what to conflict over are also keep rebranding the sides to prevent you from comprehending that every conflict represents your choice of want vs not want; while ignoring need.
You neither have to believe; not not believe what you thing I suggest. You need to adapt to whatever inspires you, while resisting the temptation to consent to whatever information others are suggesting you. Only you can wield the choice to do that. Porn represents just a suggested temptation until you choosing to grab your dick; shape it into a genocide by self sacrifice; while empowering those who suggest porn to industrialize it against everyone.
a) look at the so called NPC's...what are they consenting to? Suggested mass appeal. Whatever narrative the parasitic few are pushing just has to be shaped appealing enough to tempt the ignorant many to consent to it. How to make burning; looting and murdering appealing to the many? Well...black lives matter; don't they?
b) sensing represents individual response to common perception. We all perceive the same origin differently; because we each represent a differentiation out of the same origin.
What's the proof for life; while running out of it? When will life reach truth? At death? What's the lie in being moved from inception towards death?
You want suggested proof (fiction); while ignoring the need to adapt to perceived reality; where everything already exists. It's the "until" that represents your life being moved from inception towards death aka living (growth) within the process of dying (loss).
Aka before one grows resistance to the temptation of suggestions by others. Sodomy represents want (lust tempting towards death) over need (conception for the propagation of life). And the choice at the center of need/want balance; is being targeted by choice of force (sodomy) through others; hence trying to first break free will; then subject it to the will of those dominating it. Meanwhile; only balance represents dominance for the free will of choice at its center, which can only be ignored; not broken.
Suggesting mind control by words tempts to ignore mind responding to perceived sound; hence existing within a controlled environment. When other suggest you the whole MK-Ultra; Elan School story, then they aim at your consent to their suggestion; which could also be recipes or Garfield cartoons. What matters is choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which allows those suggesting to control what those consenting put into their minds at their own free will.
EV'IDENT, adjective - "plain; open to be seen"...that represents perceivable inspiration; yet you are looking for suggested information by others as proof. Perceivable nature doesn't lack anything; it represents everything with you as the growth potential within.
CENTRAL(choice within balance) INTELLIGENCE (understanding aka standing under the suggested information by others) AGENCY (actor; which ignores that choice within balance represents a reactor enacted upon).
As a sleight of hand the parasitic few suggest "actors"; while the many ignore that actors having directors implies them representing reaction to direction aka form (life) to flow (inception towards death). And what is it that the ignorant many do instead? They mimic acting; hence reacting to what is enacted upon them.
The issue here is that the many are tricked to consent to suggested meaning by the few; predominately progressivism aka wanting outcomes; while ignoring the need to adapt to origin. Balance represents ALL value for each ONEs evaluating choice within. Balance (need/want) communicates meaning; not the choices of others suggesting imbalance (want vs not want).
Example...I want an apple ignores the need to adapt as seed to soil to propagate growth until apple as the fruit of ones (seed) labor in response to all (soil) origin.
Parasitic behavior reacts to host weakness. The parasitic few respond with suggestion (fiction) to the many ignoring perception (reality), and ignorance (want over need) represents the self inflicted weakness by choice. A tick isn't a parasite; it responds to you venturing near it; hence opportunistically exploits your weakness parasitically. The difference between suggested parasite and perceived parasitic behavior; is that the latter implicates a moving system; while the former reasons about an affixed state. It's the momentum (balance) of a moving system which causes the host/parasite dynamic, and the many ignoring this balance is what causes the few exploiting it by suggesting imbalance.