You already could easily observe that phenomena in social networks. When the "collective mind" completely take over individual one (if latter exists at all). Technology could be different, but the result is same. But the real question is who is in control of that "collective mind"?
And as any other mind, "collective mind" AKA "egregor" is vulnerable to manipulation by malicious entity. Since "collective mind" have no any noticeable ability for critical thinking (if not thinling in whole, I suppose "egregor" IQ/ability of logical thinking equal or even significantly lower than of dumbest member) things become much worse, because "collective mind" don't have even rudimentary protection from manipulation.
Based on what I'm reading, they would like it to be AI. The difficulty for them, as they put it: AI has no skin in the game so it's not 100% accurate to call it intelligence and autonomy. Your question would become, who will feed the AI it's morals and red lines.
In no way all that shitty and simple as fuck Artificial Neural Networks are even close to any intellect. ANN is just a system of equations where coefficients adjusted by training on a database to give "desired" results in the hope that with another similar data this equation system will continue give similar results. Currently there is even no any theoretical developments in the direction that possibly could become a base for some future AI. All of them was shut down in the past decades, including expert systems, invention generators and decision making cores and all that sphere was switched to the meaningless ANN masturbation.
Your question would become, who will feed the AI it's morals and red lines.
Since "AI" they talk about is just a stupid ANN, there is no any morals or red lines, only training database to calculate ANN coefficients exactly like those who train that ANN want.
"AI" is a hoax. Complete hoax created just to avoid responcibility. It is a smokescreen to hide the ones who have to be responsible for the results ANN will produce. "It is not us, it is AI decided to censor your content". "It was car AI decision to run over white girl instead of black man". "It was AI who strike civilians". That's all they need from "AI", nothing more.
You already could easily observe that phenomena in social networks. When the "collective mind" completely take over individual one (if latter exists at all). Technology could be different, but the result is same. But the real question is who is in control of that "collective mind"?
The "collective mind" becomes its own entity and is control of itself
[egregore](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egregore#:~:text=Egregore%20(also%20spelled%20egregor%3B%20from,a%20distinct%20group%20of%20people.)
And as any other mind, "collective mind" AKA "egregor" is vulnerable to manipulation by malicious entity. Since "collective mind" have no any noticeable ability for critical thinking (if not thinling in whole, I suppose "egregor" IQ/ability of logical thinking equal or even significantly lower than of dumbest member) things become much worse, because "collective mind" don't have even rudimentary protection from manipulation.
Based on what I'm reading, they would like it to be AI. The difficulty for them, as they put it: AI has no skin in the game so it's not 100% accurate to call it intelligence and autonomy. Your question would become, who will feed the AI it's morals and red lines.
They would like to pose it is as AI.
In no way all that shitty and simple as fuck Artificial Neural Networks are even close to any intellect. ANN is just a system of equations where coefficients adjusted by training on a database to give "desired" results in the hope that with another similar data this equation system will continue give similar results. Currently there is even no any theoretical developments in the direction that possibly could become a base for some future AI. All of them was shut down in the past decades, including expert systems, invention generators and decision making cores and all that sphere was switched to the meaningless ANN masturbation.
Since "AI" they talk about is just a stupid ANN, there is no any morals or red lines, only training database to calculate ANN coefficients exactly like those who train that ANN want.
"AI" is a hoax. Complete hoax created just to avoid responcibility. It is a smokescreen to hide the ones who have to be responsible for the results ANN will produce. "It is not us, it is AI decided to censor your content". "It was car AI decision to run over white girl instead of black man". "It was AI who strike civilians". That's all they need from "AI", nothing more.
When the owner/trainer of the AI is not legally responsible for the decisions of their AI, we're gonna have a problem.
Borg queen.
Did you even read this? That's not what is being discussed.
So, tell me what do you think is being discussed?