Most of the extreme LGBT+ crowd (not all, just the aggressive ones) tend to be sexually predatory imho.
They tend to get away with stuff that if anyone else tried it, especially a non-lgbt guy....they would arrested, beat up, or publically called out and escorted from the premises....
Usually they make jokes about it but they do that just to see what they can get away with.
Again this is only my experience with the aggressive side of that space. I have met many gay and lesbian and bi people who don't advertises it, and who for all other reasons would seem to not be defined by it.
An example would be the Don Lemon sexual harassment lawsuit. I mean, how out of line was that guy? Except, of course, the victim now suddenly recalls it didn't happen. Whoopsie!
On a more serious note, people who worked at the student health centre at my university told me that lesbians were considered high-risk for genital warts and the places they frequented were given derisive names reflecting that. I would like to ask actual sex workers about this topic than read some rant.
Here's the article. Yes, Google now thinks I'm a queer woman.
Lesbians have a reputation for being tight-fisted. It's no wonder there are no lesbian sex workers. They know how cheap and surly their clients would be.
Forcing sex? Hiring a prostitute is forcing sex? Who forced the sex I wonder. Technically the prostitute did. They sold sex for profit. Forcing it. Utterly complict, absolutely intent on selling it, motivated towards it. Not the John, it's there regardless. Sure they might have had a pimp behind them. Yawn. Sure you might have demanded your money's worth. Yawn. It wasn't forced by anybody else.
Laughable that there's this feed. Women can't find lesbian prostitues. Wahaa it costs more. Too right. How do you put a condom on it. How is that fucking done, and with what. Selective services often cost more. Shut up.
No. Most hookers, hook with the same sex selectively. Either they're selling a duo. Or they're exclusively women only. Cringe. Cringe even more with that one.
Laughable topic. Hilarious. I simply entered to challenge the forced rape bullshit. How do you rape a prostitute, you can if you're a cunt. No, but seriously. Play nice.
Those are the words I spit back when I'm told my super straight sexuality isn't inclusive. Can't be if the person in front of me doesn't even turn me on.
Sex work being work is also very scrutinized because of sex trafficking. The first three words I typed is what makes the difference.
A debatable statement. Forcing sex is rape. Not one I am want to debate. But I am gonna say no not completely.
You didn't rape a sex worker forced into it. You bought sex. It might count as rape in certain courts. If prostitution is illegal.
How do you rape a sex worker. You can, but by law it is generally classed as sexual assault. There are exceptions, big exceptions. But it's a very grim topic. But jokingly you didn't pay that sex worker? No there's worse. Not a topic to exploit.
Sex trafficking, not all, no. In fact it's often a much smaller number, in places where it's criminalised, or in real shitholes. Plenty like how they earn from it. They like sex and have found a market to profit from.
There's always preference and choice. How you choose and your preference. Don't care. Play nice.
Right now the trans think it's appropriate to tell people not interested in their kinks that they have a genital fetish. That is absolutely not appropriate sexual behavior. It's also preditory to the younger people who fall for that inclusion or you're a bigot garbage.
Imagine if they don't tell you they're trans. Is what they want. It would be rape. Basically it has become this, and it's how evil the people behind them have pressed for them to be inserted. By inserting them into ladies toilets, changing rooms, and sports. Declaring them women. Until they're under no obligation to prove it. Rape. Non consent. Legislation might finally catch up. Instead of previously attacking and silencing the opposition.
It is sexual deviance. They have been granted a choice through medicine. Without medicine they wouldn't survive that choice. Put them on an Island without Meds. It's not evolution. They cannot become who they want. Medicine extracting a worse toll than smoking and often alcoholism. They average the least longevity outside of other terminal health conditions, potentially decades less than natural age. Of course there are stages of life when they change young, old etc. But they have the highest risks of cancers due immune risks by hormone therapy, and its continued regression. Hormone therapy, steroids, and antibiotics are directly linked to cancer. Most wind up dead due to being completely insane, their suicide rates are staggering, above 50 percent. Their minds aren't healthy.
All for a bizarre kink. All for a fetish. No science proving they factually exist. Outside of certain defects. Not enough to change biology. Except it has tried to insert them. In doing do it creates unbalance. Because people aren't happy with who they are. So they're promoted. It serves medicine profiting more of any experiments. These experiments don't care about them or anybody else. Simple profit and brand new guinea pigs to experiment with. It hasn't found the holy grail and instead it divides society.
The Left want you to think that sex workers are empowered by their choice to prostitute themselves. They would like you to overlook the level of desperation that might lead a person to make that choice.
Most of the extreme LGBT+ crowd (not all, just the aggressive ones) tend to be sexually predatory imho.
They tend to get away with stuff that if anyone else tried it, especially a non-lgbt guy....they would arrested, beat up, or publically called out and escorted from the premises....
Usually they make jokes about it but they do that just to see what they can get away with.
Again this is only my experience with the aggressive side of that space. I have met many gay and lesbian and bi people who don't advertises it, and who for all other reasons would seem to not be defined by it.
An example would be the Don Lemon sexual harassment lawsuit. I mean, how out of line was that guy? Except, of course, the victim now suddenly recalls it didn't happen. Whoopsie!
The things people won't do for money these days!
On a more serious note, people who worked at the student health centre at my university told me that lesbians were considered high-risk for genital warts and the places they frequented were given derisive names reflecting that. I would like to ask actual sex workers about this topic than read some rant.
Here's the article. Yes, Google now thinks I'm a queer woman.
I'm A Queer Woman. Here's What Happened When I Tried To Hire A Female Sex Worker. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/queer-woman-female-sex-worker_n_626d0086e4b04a9ff89c3863
I read multiple accounts yesterday explaining that non straight John's are so high risk for stds that no one wants them.
Are you sure it's not just society seeing women as being providers of pleasure?
If they're mad no one will fuck them for money, that's definitely an issue.
"It's not rape rape" -Caryn Elaine Johnson
Lesbians have a reputation for being tight-fisted. It's no wonder there are no lesbian sex workers. They know how cheap and surly their clients would be.
It's actually more of an issue of std's. Non straight equals higher chances.
Forcing sex? Hiring a prostitute is forcing sex? Who forced the sex I wonder. Technically the prostitute did. They sold sex for profit. Forcing it. Utterly complict, absolutely intent on selling it, motivated towards it. Not the John, it's there regardless. Sure they might have had a pimp behind them. Yawn. Sure you might have demanded your money's worth. Yawn. It wasn't forced by anybody else.
Laughable that there's this feed. Women can't find lesbian prostitues. Wahaa it costs more. Too right. How do you put a condom on it. How is that fucking done, and with what. Selective services often cost more. Shut up.
Not even the hookers want to fuck that one.
No. Most hookers, hook with the same sex selectively. Either they're selling a duo. Or they're exclusively women only. Cringe. Cringe even more with that one.
Laughable topic. Hilarious. I simply entered to challenge the forced rape bullshit. How do you rape a prostitute, you can if you're a cunt. No, but seriously. Play nice.
Continuous, enthusiastic consent.
Those are the words I spit back when I'm told my super straight sexuality isn't inclusive. Can't be if the person in front of me doesn't even turn me on.
Sex work being work is also very scrutinized because of sex trafficking. The first three words I typed is what makes the difference.
A debatable statement. Forcing sex is rape. Not one I am want to debate. But I am gonna say no not completely.
You didn't rape a sex worker forced into it. You bought sex. It might count as rape in certain courts. If prostitution is illegal.
How do you rape a sex worker. You can, but by law it is generally classed as sexual assault. There are exceptions, big exceptions. But it's a very grim topic. But jokingly you didn't pay that sex worker? No there's worse. Not a topic to exploit.
Sex trafficking, not all, no. In fact it's often a much smaller number, in places where it's criminalised, or in real shitholes. Plenty like how they earn from it. They like sex and have found a market to profit from.
There's always preference and choice. How you choose and your preference. Don't care. Play nice.
If there's no consent, or bullying.
Right now the trans think it's appropriate to tell people not interested in their kinks that they have a genital fetish. That is absolutely not appropriate sexual behavior. It's also preditory to the younger people who fall for that inclusion or you're a bigot garbage.
Imagine if they don't tell you they're trans. Is what they want. It would be rape. Basically it has become this, and it's how evil the people behind them have pressed for them to be inserted. By inserting them into ladies toilets, changing rooms, and sports. Declaring them women. Until they're under no obligation to prove it. Rape. Non consent. Legislation might finally catch up. Instead of previously attacking and silencing the opposition.
It is sexual deviance. They have been granted a choice through medicine. Without medicine they wouldn't survive that choice. Put them on an Island without Meds. It's not evolution. They cannot become who they want. Medicine extracting a worse toll than smoking and often alcoholism. They average the least longevity outside of other terminal health conditions, potentially decades less than natural age. Of course there are stages of life when they change young, old etc. But they have the highest risks of cancers due immune risks by hormone therapy, and its continued regression. Hormone therapy, steroids, and antibiotics are directly linked to cancer. Most wind up dead due to being completely insane, their suicide rates are staggering, above 50 percent. Their minds aren't healthy.
All for a bizarre kink. All for a fetish. No science proving they factually exist. Outside of certain defects. Not enough to change biology. Except it has tried to insert them. In doing do it creates unbalance. Because people aren't happy with who they are. So they're promoted. It serves medicine profiting more of any experiments. These experiments don't care about them or anybody else. Simple profit and brand new guinea pigs to experiment with. It hasn't found the holy grail and instead it divides society.
You've explained why they tried calling not wanting them a fetish. They once again failed because being vanilla is already a known fetish.
The Left want you to think that sex workers are empowered by their choice to prostitute themselves. They would like you to overlook the level of desperation that might lead a person to make that choice.
That's why it was rebranded, and expanded.